DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Application and assessment of ecosystem health index for sustainable conservation and use of border areas

접경지역의 지속가능한 보전과 이용을 위한 생태계 건강성 지수 적용 및 평가

  • Kim, Jung-In (Team of Ecosystem Services, National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Ko, Ha-Jung (Graduate School of Landscape Architecture, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kwon, Hyuk-Soo (Team of Ecosystem Services, National Institute of Ecology)
  • 김정인 (국립생태원) ;
  • 고하정 (경희대학교 예술디자인대학 환경조경디자인학과) ;
  • 권혁수 (국립생태원 )
  • Received : 2023.11.06
  • Accepted : 2023.12.15
  • Published : 2023.12.30

Abstract

This study assessed the ecological health of border areas using the ecological health index and suggested Indicators for maintaining and promoting ecological values. We analyzed the change trends, pressures, and resilience of ecosystems and services in border areas, and identified their current status and sustainability. The main findings were: (1) ecological assets and ecosystem services in border areas could be compared through ecosystem health assessment; (2) it can be used to set priorities for management and conservation by identifying the relative importance and vulnerability of ecosystems and ecosystem services in each border area; and (3) the index presented in this study can be judged to have explanatory power for the characteristics of border areas and ecosystem health when compared to previous studies. Limitations of this study include the lack of literature and statistical data at the local government level and the resulting limited application of evaluation methods, which limited direct regional comparisons. To overcome the research limitations, further studies are needed, such as establishing ecological information in border areas, mapping and assessment of ecosystem services, and developing and applying assessments that reflect the opinions and participation of various stakeholders. This study was the first attempt to assess the health of ecosystems and ecosystem services in border areas and provided an important baseline for future changes in border areas. In the future, it will be helpful in national and local government policies and ecological assetecosystem management by supplementing insufficient information and presenting clear goals.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 논문은 국립생태원 '생태계서비스 평가 기반 정책 결정 지원체계 수립(NIE-고유연구-2023-03)'의 지원을 받았습니다.

References

  1. Aall, C. 2005. "The Concept of indicators" Paper presented at a seminar within the EUproject Capaticy building to enable the incorporation of urban sustainability parameters in spatial urban development and planning policy practices thtough the use of indicators (URBANGUARD). Nicosia. Cyprus. 8-9 August 2005.
  2. Baeck SH, Choi SJ, Hong SJ, and Kim DP. 2011. A study on comparison of normalization and weighting method for constructing index about flood. Journal of Wetlands Research. 13(3): 411-426. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2011.13.3.411
  3. Elfes C. T., C. Longo, B. S. Halpern, D. Hardy, C. Scarborough, B. D. Best, T. Pinheiro, and G. F. Dutra. 2014. A regional-scale ocean health index for Brazil. PLoS One. 9(4): e92589.
  4. Han SM. 2019. The German Green Belt, from a dividing line of the cold War to a space for life and peace: The development process of the German Green Belt after the reunification of Germany and its current policy landscape. Koreanisch-Deutsche Gesellschaft Fuer Sozialwissenschaften. 29(4): 225-248. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.19032/zkdgs.2019.12.29.4.225
  5. Halpern B. S., C. Longo, D. Hardy, K. L. McLeod, J. F. Samhouri, S. K. Katona, K. Kleisner, S. E. Lester, J. O'Leary, M. Ranelletti, A. A. Rosenberg, C. Scarborough, E. R. Selig, B. D. Best , D. R. Brumbaugh, F. S. Chapin, L. B. Crowder, K. L. Daly, S. C. Doney, C. Elfes, M. J. Fogarty, S. D. Gaines, K. I. Jacobsen, L. B. Karrer, H. N. Leslie, E. Neeley, D. Pauly, S. Polasky, B. Ris, K. St Martin, G. S. Stone, U. R. Sumaila, and D. Zeller. 2012. An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean. Nature. 488(7413): 615-620.
  6. Halpern B. S., C. Longo, C. Scarborough, D. Hardy, B. D. Best, S. C. Doney, S. K. Katona, K. L. McLeod, A. A. Rosenberg, and J. F. Samhouri. 2014. Assessing the health of the US West coast with a regional-scale application of the ocean health index. PLoS One. 9(6): e98995.
  7. Hong HJ. 2020. A study on development and applications of methods for ecosystem health assessment. Ph.D dissertation, Korea University, Seoul. (in Korean with English summary)
  8. Hwang SH., Jeon SW., Namkung SP., and Hwang HH. 2021. The Application of the lessons of the inner German border area in the DMZ future planning: focusing on deriving lessons from the collapse phase. Korea Environmental Policy And Administration Society. 27(1): 77-99. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2021.29.1.77
  9. Kim CH. 2010. Study of vegetation of civilian control line․DMZ area. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 13(6): 63-74. (in Korean)
  10. Kim CK, Hong HJ, Lee HW, and Joo WY. 2017. Development of natural capital sustainability index based on ecosystem services(II). Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean with English summary)
  11. Kim DY. 2015. A Study on the Development of the DMZ Tourism Merchandising which Use Storytelling, The Korean Society of Business Venturing. 10(1): 83-93. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.10.1.201502.83
  12. Kim JE, Park JY, Lee JH, and Kim TW. 2019. Socioeconomic vulnerability assessment of drought using principal component analysis and entropy method. Korea Water Resources Association. 52(6): 441-449. (in Korean)
  13. Ko YK. 2018. "Borders separate, nature unites!" : The German Grunes Band as a Ecological Site of Memory. The Korean History Education Review. 145: 143-173. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.18622/kher.2018.03.145.143
  14. Lee AY., Shin HT., Bak GP., Jung JY., and Sung CY. 2020a. Classification of the damaged areas in the DMZ using high-resolution satellite images and climate and topography data. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 23(1): 1-14. (in Korean)
  15. Lee G. 2007. Study on the development of educational gap index: focusing on the review of methodology. The Journal of Educational Administration. 25(1): 1-24. (in Korean)
  16. Lee HW, Kim CK, and Hong HJ. 2016. Development of natural capital sustainability index based on ecosystem services(I). Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean with English summary)
  17. Lee SH., Kang JE., Bae HJ., and Yoon DK. 2015. Vulnerability assessment of the air pollution using entropy weights: Focused on ozone. Journal of The Korean Association of Regional Geographers. 21(4): 751-763. (in Korean)
  18. Lee SM, Choi YJ, Lee EK, Ji JW, and Yi JE. 2022. Development for rainfall classification based on local flood vulnerability using entropy weight in Seoul metropolitan area. Korea Water Resources Association. 55(4): 267-278. (in Korean)
  19. Lee SM., Choi YJ., and Yi JE. 2020b. Urban flood vulnerability assessment using the entropy weight method. Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation. 20(6): 389-397. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2020.20.6.389
  20. Ma LT, Kim JS, Lee KS, and Choi YC. 2021. A study on evaluation of earthquake risk in korea based on expert survey and entropy weight method. Journal of Next-generation Convergence Technology Association. 5(5): 806-815. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.33097/JNCTA.2021.05.05.674
  21. Ministry of Environment. 2016. Operation of the 2016 DMZ ecological forum: DMZ unification feasibility assessment and utilization plan. (in Korean)
  22. Ministry of Environmental. 2019. Research on establishing comprehensive ecosystem conservation measures in the DMZ area. (in Korean)
  23. Ministry of Environment. 2020. Environmental statistics yearbook. (in Korean)
  24. Mun YS., Nam WH., Yang MH., Shin JH., Jeon MG., Kim T., Lee SY., and Lee KY., 2021. Evaluation of agricultural drought disaster vulnerability using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and entropy weighting method. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers. 63(3): 13-26. (in Korean)
  25. Na HS., Park JM., Choi JY., and Lee JS. 2015. A Study on Spatial Characteristic of Damaged Forest Areas by Image Interpretation-Focused on DMZ region in Hwacheon and Cheorwon. Jorunal of Photo Geography. 25(3): 63-73. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.35149/jakpg.2015.25.3.005
  26. Nardo, M., M. Saisana, A. Saltelli, and S. Tarantola. 2005. Tools for Composite Indicators Building. European Communities Joint Research Centre.
  27. Natori Y., T. Hatori, S. Okayasu, and M. Tsuda. 2014. The Land Health Index: Developing a tool for gauging positive actions for biodiversity and ecosystem services. Natural Resources and Ecosystem Services. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies. Japan.
  28. Saisana M. and S. Tarantola. 2002, State-of-the-art report on current methodologies and practices for composite indicator development. European Communities Joint Research Centre.
  29. Seong JH. and Byun YS. 2016. A study on the weights of the condition evaluation of rock slope used in entropy and AHP method. Journal of the Korean Society of Safety. 31(5): 61-66. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2016.31.5.61
  30. Shannon C.E. 1948. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System echnical Journal. 27(3): 379-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
  31. Sinsomboonthong, S. 2022. Performance comparison of new adjusted Min-Max with decimal scaling and statistical column normalization methods for artificial neural network classification. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences 2022: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3584406
  32. Sung HC., Kim SR., Kang DI., Seo JY., and Lee SM. 2016. Analysis on the type of damagedland in Demilitarized Zone(DMZ) area and restoration direction. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology. 19(1): 185-193. (in Korean) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2016.19.1.185
  33. Yoo G and Kim IA. 2008. Development and application of a climate change vulnerability index. Korea Environment Institute. (in Korean with English summary)