DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Do Physiognomically Designated Protected Areas Match Well with Ecological Data based upon Diversity Indices and Ordination? Implications for Urban Forest Conservation

  • Kee Dae Kim (Department of Environmental Education, Korea National University of Education)
  • 투고 : 2023.02.24
  • 심사 : 2023.04.06
  • 발행 : 2023.05.31

초록

We surveyed the vegetation of an ecological landscape preservation area (legally protected conservation areas or national parks) and the surrounding areas of Mt. Cheonggye, Republic of Korea, to explore the conservation implications for preservation areas and surrounding transition areas. We calculated diversity indices to identify the properties of the preservation and surrounding areas that are relevant to conservation efforts. We then compared the plant community composition between the areas using field and quadrat surveys in the preservation and surrounding areas. The cover of the dominant species in all tree and herb layers was markedly higher in the preservation area than in the peripheral zones. The species richness indices were significantly higher in the preservation area than in the peripheral zones. Ordination using detrended canonical correspondence analyses showed that the cover of the dominant tree species and rocks could explain the distribution of plant species in the Cartesian space of the ordination. Our results demonstrate that physiognomically designated protected areas match well with ecological data based on diversity indices and ordination analyses and that disturbances in the areas surrounding the ecological landscape of preservation areas can have considerable impacts on plant diversity indices. Hence, the preservation and management of surrounding areas are essential conservation elements for protecting the entire ecological landscape of preservation areas.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Barbour, M. G., Burk, J. H., Pitts, W. D., Gilliam, F. S., Schwartz, M. W., 1999, Terrestrial plant ecology, Addison Wesley Longman, Inc., Menlo Park.
  2. Braun-Blanquet, J., 1932, Plant sociology; the study of plant communities, McGraw Hill, New York.
  3. Hammer, O., 2018, Paleontological statistics, University of Oslo, Oslo.
  4. Jean, M., Lafleur, B., Fenton, N. J., Pare, D., Bergeron, Y., 2019, Influence of fire and harvest severity on understory plant communities, For Ecol and Manag 436, 88-104 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2019.01.004
  5. Kim, J. Y., Lee, K. J., 2012, Vegetation structure and the density of thinning for the inducement of the ecological succession in artificial forest, national parks - In case of Chiaksan, Songnisan, Deogyusan, and Naejangsan - Kor. J. Env. Eco., 26, 604-619.
  6. Lee, I., 2022, An Ecological study on Magnolia obovata Thunb., an invasive exotic tree in forest ecosystem, Master's thesis of Graduate School of Korea National University of Education, Chung-Buk, Korea.
  7. Lee, T. B., 1985, Illustrated flora of Korea, Hyangmunsa, Seoul.
  8. Lee, J. H., Ahn, D. K., 1995, Distribution of herbal resources in Mt. Chonggye, J. Tradit. Korean Med., 1, 1-17.
  9. Mills, M., Alvarea-Romero, J. G., Vance-Borland, K., Cohen, P., 2014, Linking regional planning and local action: Towards using social network analysis in systematic conservation planning, Biol. Conserv., 169, 14-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.10.006
  10. Mueller-Dombois, D., 1974, Aims and methods of vegetation ecology, John Wiley, New York.
  11. Nacoulma, B. M. I., Schmann, K., Traore, S., Romermann, M. B., Hahn, K., Wittig, R., Thiombiano, A., 2011, Impacts of land-use on West African savanna vegetation: a comparison between protected and communal area in Burkina Faso, Biodivers. Conserv., 20, 3341-3362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-0114-0
  12. National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER), 2012, Alien species in Korea, Geobook, Seoul.
  13. Park, S. H., 1995, Colored illustrations of naturalized plants of Korea, Ilchokak, Seoul.
  14. Park, S. H., 2001, Colored illustrations of naturalized plants of Korea (Appendix), Ilchokak, Seoul.
  15. Pielou, E. C., 1975, Ecological diversity, John Wiley and Sons, INC.
  16. Rad, J. E., Manthey, M., Mataji, A., 2009, Comparison of plant species diversity with different plant communities in deciduous forests, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tec., 6, 389-394. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326077
  17. Rohlf, F. J., Sokal, R. R., 1995, Statistical tables, 3rd edn. W. H. Freeman Co, New York.
  18. Sanders, S., Grochowski, J., 2014, Alternative metrics for evaluating forest integrity and assessing change at four northern-tier U.S. National parks, Am. Midl. Nat., 171, 185-203. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-171.2.185
  19. Sher, A., Primack, R., 2019, An introduction of conservation biology, Oxford University Press.
  20. Sinha, S., Badola, H. K., Chhetri, B., Gaira, K. S., Lepcha, J., Dhyani, P. P., 2018, Effect of altitude and climate in shaping the forest composition of Singalila National Park in Khangchendzonga landscape, Eastern Himalaya, India, J. of Asia-Pac. Biodivers., 11, 267-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2018.01.012
  21. Squeo, F. A., Loayza, A. P., Lopez, R. P., Gutierrez, J. R., 2016, Vegetation of Bosque Fray Jorge national park and its surrounding matrix in the coastal desert of north-central Chile, J. of Arid Environ., 126,12-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.10.013
  22. Ter Braak, C. J. F., Smilauer, P., 2002, CANOCO Reference manual and CanoDraw for Windows user's guide: Software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5), Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, NY, USA.
  23. UNEP-WCMC, 2018, Protected planet report 2018, Gland, Switzerland, and Washington, DC.
  24. Whittaker, R. H., 1972, Evolution and measurement of species diversity, Taxon, 8, 11-22.
  25. Withgott, J., Laposata, M., 2012, Essential environment: the science behind the stories, Pearson Education, Inc., New York.
  26. Xie, Y., 2019, Protected area, in: Fath, B.D. (ed.), Encyclopedia of ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 451-457.
  27. Yim, Y. J., Kira, T., 1976, Distribution of forest vegetation and climate in Korean peninsula. II. Distribution of climatic humidity/aridity, Jap. J. Ecol., 26, 157-164.
  28. Young, K. R., 1993, National park protection in relation to the ecological zonation of a neighboring human community: An example from Northern Peru, Mt. Res. and Dev., 13, 267-280.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3673656