DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Biocontrol Agents on Weed Control, Abundance of Aquatic Animals and Insects, and Yield in Paddy Rice Fields

생물자원의 논 잡초 생물학적 방제 효과와 그에 따른 수서동물과 곤충 종수 및 벼 수량 변화

  • Hyo Jung Choi (Division of Climate Change Response, R&D Breau, Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Sang Young Seo (Division of Climate Change Response, R&D Breau, Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Seon U Choi (Division of Climate Change Response, R&D Breau, Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Chang Kyu Lee (Division of Climate Change Response, R&D Breau, Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Mi Jeong Uhm (Division of Climate Change Response, R&D Breau, Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Ju Hee Kim (Division of Climate Change Response, R&D Breau, Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Min Sil An (Division of Agriculture Food Devlopment, R&D Breau, Jeollabuk-do Agricultural Research and Extension Services) ;
  • Woo Jung Choi (Department of Rural and Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Chonnam National University)
  • 최효정 (전라북도농업기술원 연구개발국 농업환경과) ;
  • 서상영 (전라북도농업기술원 연구개발국 농업환경과) ;
  • 최선우 (전라북도농업기술원 연구개발국 농업환경과) ;
  • 이창규 (전라북도농업기술원 연구개발국 농업환경과) ;
  • 엄미정 (전라북도농업기술원 연구개발국 농업환경과) ;
  • 김주희 (전라북도농업기술원 연구개발국 농업환경과) ;
  • 안민실 (전라북도농업기술원 연구개발국 작물식품과) ;
  • 최우정 (전남대학교 농업생명과학대학 지역.바이오시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2023.03.10
  • Accepted : 2023.03.26
  • Published : 2023.03.31

Abstract

Golden apple snails (Pomacea canaliculat) (GAS) are widely used for weed control in rice cultivation. However, concerns on the ecological risk of invasive GAS species are increasing. This study aimed to evaluate the overall impacts of GAS on weed control, abundance of aquatic animals and insects, and rice yield, in comparison with that from other biocontrol agents such as loach (Misgurnus mizolepis) and catfish (Silurus asotus), which are alternatives for biological weed control in rice paddy cultivation. Field experiments included five treatments; control, herbicide, GAS, loach, and catfish. During the rice growth, weed appearance and biological abundance were monitored, and at harvest, the rice yield was determined. Weed control efficiency was the highest for GAS treatment (100%), followed by that for herbicide (95.8%), loach (57.5%), and catfish treatments (31.7%). Insect abundance was considerably decreased in GAS treatment due to heavy weed removal, which affects the habitat of aquatic animals and insects. The amount of rice yield (unit: kg 10 a-1) was in the order of GAS (798.9) > loach (708.1) = herbicide (700.7) > catfish (629.4) > control (496.0). Therefore, considering the weed control efficiency, biological abudance, and rice yield, loach could be a potential alternative for biological weed control in organic rice farming. However, the activity of the biocontrol agents are susceptible to environmental conditions; therefore, further studies under different conditions are essential to confirm these findings.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was carried out with the support of "Research Program for Agricultural Science & Technology Development (Project No. PJ01560403)", National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

References

  1. Tshewang S, Sindel BM, Ghimiray M, Chauhan BS (2016) Weed management challenges in rice (Oryza sativa L.) for food security in Bhutan: A review. Crop Protection, 90, 117-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cro pro.2016.08.031.
  2. Kim HD (1998) Weed control effect by input of Golden Apple snails. In Korean Society of Organic Agriculture Symposium for the 1sthalf of the Year, 83-90.
  3. Jeong SJ, Park HS, Oh JS, Choi BC, Choi SK (1999) Studies on the ecology and ingestion of Ampullarius insularus for weeding of paddy rice. Korean Journal of Organic Agriculture, 7(2), 169-177.
  4. Katano O, Hosoya K, Iguchi KI, Aonuma Y (2001) Comparison of fish fauna among three types of rice fields in the Chikuma River basin. Japanese Journal of Ichthyology, 48(1), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.113 69/jji1950.48.19. https://doi.org/10.11369/jji1950.48.19
  5. Harding JS, Norton DA, McIntosh AR (2007) Persistence of a significant population of rare Canterbury mudfish (Neochanna burrowsius) in a hydrologically isolated catchment. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 41, 309-316. https://doi. org/10.1080/00288330709509918.
  6. Kim JO, Shin HS, Yoo JH, Lee SH, Jang KS, Kim BC (2011) Functional evaluation of small-scale pond at paddy field as a shelter for mudfish during midsummer drainage period. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 30(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJ EA.2011.30.1.37.
  7. Peterson MS (1990) Hypoxia-induced physiological changes in two mangrove swamp fishes: sheepshead minnow, Cyprinodon variegatus Lacepede and sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna (Lesueur). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Physiology, 97(1), 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9629(90)90715-5.
  8. Wada T (2004) Strategies for controlling the apple snail Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck) (Gastropoda: Ampullariidae) in Japanese direct-sown paddy fields. Japan Agricultural Research Quarterly, 38(2), 75-80. https:// doi.org/10.6090/jarq.38.75.
  9. Horgan FG, Figueroa JY, Almazan MLP (2014) Seedling broadcasting as a potential method to reduce apple snail damage to rice. Crop Protection, 64, 168-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2014.06.022.
  10. Turner MG (2010) Disturbance and landscape dynamics in a changing world. Ecology, 91(10), 2833-2849. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-0097.1.
  11. Lee SB, Koh MH, Na YE, Kim JH (2002) Physiological and ecological characteristics of the apple snails. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 21(1), 50-56. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2002.21.1.050.
  12. Lee CR, Hong SG, Lee SB, Park CB, Kim MG, Kim JH, Park KL (2015) Physico-chemical properties of organically cultivated upland soils. Journal of Organic Agriculture, 23(4), 875-886. https://doi.org/10.116 25/KJOA.2015.23.4.875. https://doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2015.23.4.875
  13. Cha EJ, Hamm SY, Kim HJ, Lee JH, Ok SI (2010) Physical and chemical properties of soil in Jang-San wetland, Busan metropolitan city. Journal of Environmental Science International, 19(11), 1363-1374. https://doi.org/10.5322/JES.2010.19.11.1363.
  14. Gee GW, Bauder JW, Klute A (1986) Methods of soil analysis, in: part 1, physical and mineralogical methods. pp. 383-412, Soil Science Society of America, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  15. Litsinger JA, Estano DB (1993) Management of the golden apple snail Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck) in rice. Crop Protection, 12(5), 363-370. https://doi. org/10.1016/0261-2194(93)90079-X.
  16. Uchida S (1990) Distribution of Plecoptera in the Tamagawa river system, central Japan. in: Campbell, I.C. (eds) Mayflies and stoneflies: Life histories and biology. Series Entomologica, vol 44. pp. 181-188, Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-239 7-3_22.
  17. Choi MG, Kim SS, Lee SY, Choi SY (1995) Influence of midsummer drainage on growth and lodging of rice in direct seeding on dry paddy. Korean Journal of Crop Science, 40(5), 574-579.
  18. Kim JO, Shin HS, Yoo JH, Lee SH, Jang KS, Kim, BC (2011) Functional evaluation of small-scale pond at paddy field as a shelter for mudfish during midsummer drainage period. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 30(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/10. 5338/KJEA.2011.30.1.37. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2011.30.1.37
  19. You YH, Kim HR (2010) Key factors causing the Euryale ferox endangered hydrophyte in Korea and management strategies for conservation. Journal of Wetlands Research, 12(3), 49-56.
  20. Semeniuk CA, Semeniuk V (1995) A geomorphic approach to global classification for inland wetlands. Classification and Inventory of the World's Wetlands, pp. 103-124. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0427-2_9.
  21. Han MS, Nam HK, Kang KK, Kim M, Na YE, Kim HR, Kim MH (2013) Characteristics of benthic invertebrates in organic and conventional paddy field. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 32(1), 17-23. http://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2013.32.1.17.
  22. Klaus VH, Kleinebecker T, Prati D, Gossner MM, Alt F, Boch S, Gockel S, Hemp A, Lange M et al. (2013) Does organic grassland farming benefit plant and arthropod diversity at the expense of yield and soil fertility?. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 177, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.05.019.
  23. Desneux N, Decourtye A, Delpuech JM (2007) The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annual Review Entomology, 52, 81-106. https://doi. org/10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091440.
  24. Paik NH, Kim SS, Park HG, Shin HT, Cho SY, Lee SR (1997) The effect of number of midsummer drainage in growth and lodging in direct seeding of rice on flooded paddy surface. Korean Journal of Crop Science, 42(6), 722-728.
  25. Lee MH, Oh YJ, Park RK (1991) Lodging mechanisms and reducing damage of rice plant. Korean Journal of Crop Science, 36(5), 383-393.
  26. Saha B, Panda P, Patra PS, Panda R, Kundu A, Roy AS, Mahato N (2017) Effect of different levels of nitrogen on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars under terai-agro climatic situation. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(7), 2408-2418. https//doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas. 2017.607.285.
  27. Lee KD, An HY, Ryu JH, Lee BM, Na SI (2022) Estimation of rice yield in paddy damaged by rice blast using UAV imagery. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 55(4), 361-368. https://doi.org/10. 7745/KJSSF.2022.55.4.361. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2022.55.4.361
  28. Moon YH, Oh DH, Choi JS, Na JS, Han SS (1998) Properities and effects of utilizable materials for organic farming in rice. Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 17(4), 319-323.
  29. Stuart AM, Palenzuela AN, Bernal CC, Ramal AF, Horgan FG (2014) Effects of fertiliser applications on survival and recruitment of the apple snail, Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck). Crop Protection, 64, 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2014.05.020.