Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative accuracy of implant impression techniques with different splinting materials

임플란트 인상채득 방법과 인상용 코핑 연결 고정에 따른 정확성 비교

  • Ki-Yoon Hong (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Soo-Yeon Shin (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 홍기윤 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 신수연 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2022.11.10
  • Accepted : 2023.01.31
  • Published : 2023.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: We investigated the effect of open tray impression using pick-up impression coping and close tray impression using transfer impression coping on the accuracy of impression in edentulous patients on their mandibular parts. the effect of material types of pick-up type impression copings for splinting in open tray impression on the accuracy of impression was also evaluated. Materials and Methods: Two implant fixtures were implanted in parallel in the left molar of the mandibular in the shape of a mandibular partial edentulous model. The 40 individual trays were fabricated using 3D printer. The prepared individual trays were classified into 4 groups (i.e., PN, PG, PH, and TN groups), and a total of 40 impression-takings were conducted. A master cast was connected to a Scan Body. The converted STL file was super-imposed on the scan images of the various groups. Results: The order of standard deviation values decreased as follows: PN (0.2343 ± 0.0844 mm), TN (0.2192 ± 0.0840 mm), indicating that the high accuracy of impression for TN group. In addition, for the comparison results between the material types used in splinting the open tray impression, the PH group showed a relatively lower standard deviation (0.1910 ± 0.1176 mm) than that of the PN group (0.2343 ± 0.0844 mm), PG group (0.2556 ± 0.1082 mm). Conclusion: The acrylic resin synthesized by light-induced polymerization exhibited a higher accuracy of impression taking than that of autopolymerizing acrylic resin. Meanwhile, the accuracy of impression taking was not dependent on the implant impression taking method or the presence of connection/fixation of impression copings.

목적: 하악 부분 무치악 모형에서 pick-up type 인상용 코핑을 사용한 개방형 인상 채득법과 transfer type 인상용 코핑을 사용한 폐쇄형 인상 채득법, 개방형 인상 채득법에서 pick-up type 인상용 코핑 고정 재료에 따른 인상 채득 정확성을 비교 하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 하악 부분 무치악 모형의 좌측 구치부에 직경 4.5 mm, 길이 11.5 mm의 임플란트 고정체 두 개 식립 후 3D 프린터를 이용하여 개방형 개인 트레이 30개 폐쇄형 개인 트레이 10개를 제작하였다. 제작한 개인 트레이를 이용하여 PN군: 개방형 인상 채득법(non-splint), PG군: 개방형 인상 채득법(splint GC pattern resin), PH군: 개방형 인상 채득법(splint Herifix), TN군: 폐쇄형 인상 채득법으로 나누어 각 군당 10회씩 총 40회의 인상 채득을 진행하였다. 인상채득 후 석고 모형을 제작하여 모델 스캐너로 스캔 후 역설계 프로그램으로 스캔오차를 측정하여 95% 유의수준으로 평가 하였다. 결과: 폐쇄형 인상 채득법 TN군이 개방형 인상 채득법 PN군 보다 더 낮은 오차값을 보였다. 개방형 인상 채득법(splint)에 사용된 인상용 코핑 고정 재료 간의 비교 결과에서는 PH군에서 가장 낮은 오차값을 보였으며 PN군, PG군 순으로 정확한 인상 채득 정확성을 보여주었다. 결론: 임플란트 인상 채득 방법이나 인상용 코핑의 연결 고정 유무에 따른 각 군 간의 정확성에 유의한 차이는 없다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  2. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants in anterior partially edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:180-8.
  3. Jemt T, Hjalmarsson L. In vitro measurements of precision of fit of implant-supported frameworks. A comparison between "virtual" and "physical" assessments of fit using two different techniques of measurements. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14 Suppl 1:e175-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00416.x
  4. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:7-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70229-5
  5. Cheshire PD, Hobkirk JA. An in vivo quantitative analysis of the fit of Nobel Biocare implant superstructures. J Oral Rehabil 1996;23:782-9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1996.d01-193.x
  6. Sellers GC. Direct assembly framework for osseointegrated implant prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:662-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90587-8
  7. Becker W, Becker BE, Newman MG, Nyman S. Clinical and microbiologic findings that may contribute to dental implant failure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:31-8.
  8. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1983;49:843-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90361-X
  9. Sones AD. Complications with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:581-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90084-X
  10. Winter W, Mohrle S, Holst S, Karl M. Bone loading caused by different types of misfits of implantsupported fixed dental prostheses: a three-dimensional finite element analysis based on experimental results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:947-52.
  11. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:26-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01067.x
  12. Henry PJ. An alternative method for the production of accurate casts and occlusal records in osseointegrated implant rehabilitation. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:694-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(87)90421-5
  13. Tautin FS. Impression making for osseointegrated dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:250-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90299-9
  14. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a five-implant mandibular model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:448-55.
  15. Humphries RM, Yaman P, Bloem TJ. The accuracy of implant master casts constructed from transfer impressions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:331-6.
  16. Phillips KM, Nicholls JI, Ma T, Rubenstein J. The accuracy of three implant impression techniques: A three-dimensional analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:533-40.
  17. Rodney J, Johansen R, Harris W. Dimensional accuracy of two implant impression copings. J Dent Res 1991;70:385.
  18. Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, Rosen HM. Tissue integrated prostheses. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986;77:496-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198603000-00037
  19. Hsu CC, Millstein PL, Stein RS. A comparative analysis of the accuracy of implant transfer techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:588-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90287-X
  20. Herbst D, Nel JC, Driessen CH, Becker PJ. Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:555-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70014-X
  21. Inturregui JA, Aquilino SA, Ryther JS, Lund PS. Evaluation of three impression techniques for osseointegrated oral implants. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69:503-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(93)90160-P
  22. Burawi G, Houston F, Byrne D, Claffey N. A comparison of the dimensional accuracy of the splinted and unsplinted impression techniques for the BoneLock implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:68-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70209-9
  23. Assif D, Marshak B, Schmidt A. Accuracy of implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:216-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199600540-00028
  24. Naconecy MM, Teixeira ER, Shinkai RS, Frasca LC, Cervieri A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3 transfer techniques for implant-supported prostheses with multiple abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:192-8.
  25. Vigolo P, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. Evaluation of the accuracy of three techniques used for multiple implant abutment impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89:186-92. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2003.15
  26. Cabral LM, Guedes CG. Comparative analysis of 4 impression techniques for implants. Implant Dent 2007;16:187-94. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3180587b3f
  27. Binon PP. Evaluation of machining accuracy and consistency of selected implant standard abutments and laboratory analogues. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:162-78.
  28. Lee H, So JS, Hochstedler JL, Ercoli C. The accuracy of implant impressions: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:285-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(08)60208-5
  29. Carr AB. Comparison of impression techniques for a two-implant 15-degree divergent model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:468-75.
  30. Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ. An evaluation of three implant level impression techniques for single tooth implant. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2004;12:9-14.
  31. Conrad HJ, Pesun IJ, DeLong R, Hodges JS. Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:349-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60023-7
  32. Wenz HJ, Hertrampf K. Accuracy of impressions and casts using different implant impression techniques in a multi-implant system with an internal hex connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:39-47.
  33. Barrett MG, de Rijk WG, Burgess JO. The accuracy of six impression techniques for osseointegrated implants. J Prosthodont 1993;2:75-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.1993.tb00387.x
  34. Assuncao WG, Filho HG, Zaniquelli O. Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations. Implant Dent 2004;13:358-66. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000144509.58901.f7
  35. Del'Acqua MA, Arioli-Filho JN, Compagnoni MA, Mollo Fde A Jr. Accuracy of impression and pouring techniques for an implant-supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:226-36.
  36. De La Cruz JE, Funkenbusch PD, Ercoli C, Moss ME, Graser GN, Tallents RH. Verification jig for implant-supported prostheses: A comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:329-36. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.128070
  37. Kim S, Nicholls JI, Han CH, Lee KW. Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:747-55.
  38. Assif D, Fenton A, Zarb G, Schmitt A. Comparative accuracy of implant impression procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1992;12:112-21. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199200140-00013
  39. Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:470-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.08.015
  40. Wee AG. Comparison of impression materials for direct multi‑implant impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:323‑31.
  41. Daoudi MF, Setchell DJ, Searson LJ. A laboratory investigation of the accuracy of the repositioning impression coping technique at the implant level for single-tooth implants. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2003;11:23-8.
  42. Assif D, Nissan J, Varsano I, Singer A. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:885-8.
  43. Selvaraj S, Dorairaj J, Mohan J, Simon P. Comparison of implant cast accuracy of multiple implant impression technique with different splinting materials: An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2016;16:167-75. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4052.167937
  44. Papaspyridakos P, Kim YJ, Finkelman M, El-Rafie K, Weber HP. Digital evaluation of three splinting materials used to fabricate verification jigs for fullarch implant prostheses: a comparative study. J Esthet Restor Dent 2017;29:102-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12274
  45. Lee SJ, Cho SB. Accuracy of five implant impression technique: Effect of splinting materials and methods. J Adv Prosthodont 2011;3:177-85. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2011.3.4.177
  46. Mojon P, Oberholzer JP, Meyer JM, Belser UC. Polymerization shrinkage of index and pattern acrylic resins. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:684-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90296-O