Imaging Science in Dentistry

Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (대한영상치의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Can ultra-low-dose computed tomography reliably diagnose and classify maxillofacial fractures in the clinical routine?

  • Gerlig Widmann (Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck) ;
  • Marcel Dangl (Department of Dental and Oral Medicine and Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck) ;
  • Elisa Lutz (Department of Dental and Oral Medicine and Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck) ;
  • Bernhard Fleckenstein (Department of Dental and Oral Medicine and Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck) ;
  • Vincent Offermanns (Department of Dental and Oral Medicine and Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck) ;
  • Eva-Maria Gassner (Department of Radiology, Medical University of Innsbruck) ;
  • Wolfgang Puelacher (Department of Dental and Oral Medicine and Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck) ;
  • Lukas Salbrechter (Department of Dental and Oral Medicine and Cranio-Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck)
  • Received : 2022.10.21
  • Accepted : 2023.01.04
  • Published : 2023.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Maxillofacial trauma predominantly affects young adults between 20 and 40 years of age. Although radioprotection is a legal requirement, the significant potential of dose reduction in computed tomography (CT) is still underused in the clinical routine. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether maxillofacial fractures can be reliably detected and classified using ultra-low-dose CT. Materials and Methods: CT images of 123 clinical cases with maxillofacial fractures were classified by two readers using the AOCOIAC software and compared with the corresponding results from post-treatment images. In group 1, consisting of 97 patients with isolated facial trauma, pre-treatment CT images at different dose levels (volumetric computed tomography dose index: ultra-low dose, 2.6 mGy; low dose, <10 mGy; and regular dose, <20 mGy) were compared with post-treatment cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). In group 2, consisting of 31 patients with complex midface fractures, pre-treatment shock room CT images were compared with post-treatment CT at different dose levels or CBCT. All images were presented in random order and classified by 2 readers blinded to the clinical results. All cases with an unequal classification were re-evaluated. Results: In both groups, ultra-low-dose CT had no clinically relevant effect on fracture classification. Fourteen cases in group 2 showed minor differences in the classification code, which were no longer obvious after comparing the images directly to each other. Conclusion: Ultra-low-dose CT images allowed the correct diagnosis and classification of maxillofacial fractures. These results might lead to a substantial reconsideration of current reference dose levels.

Keywords

References

  1. Kraft A, Abermann E, Stigler R, Zsifkovits C, Pedross F, Kloss F, et al. Craniomaxillofacial trauma: synopsis of 14,654 cases with 35,129 injuries in 15 years. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2012; 5: 41-50. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1293520
  2. Wick MC, Dallapozza C, Lill M, Grundtman C, Chemelli-Steingruber IE, Rieger M. The pattern of acute injuries in patients from alpine skiing accidents has changed during 2000-2011: analysis of clinical and radiological data at a level I trauma center. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133: 1367-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-013-1822-6
  3. Wick MC, Weiss RJ, Lill M, Jaschke W, Rieger M. The "Innsbruck Emergency Algorithm" avoids the underdiagnosis of blunt cervical vascular injuries. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2010; 130: 1269-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1068-5
  4. Widmann G, Dalla Torre D, Hoermann R, Schullian P, Gassner EM, Bale R, et al. Ultralow-dose computed tomography imaging for surgery of midfacial and orbital fractures using ASIR and MBIR. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2015; 44: 441-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2015.01.011
  5. Schegerer A, Loose R, Heuser LJ, Brix G. Diagnostic reference levels for diagnostic and interventional X-ray procedures in Germany: update and handling. Rofo 2019; 191: 739-51. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0824-7603
  6. Widmann G, Al-Ekrish AA. Ultralow dose MSCT imaging in dental implantology. Open Dent J 2018; 12: 87-93. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210601812010087
  7. Al-Ekrish AA, Alfadda SA, Tamimi D, Alfaleh W, Hormann R, Puelacher W, et al. Do ultra-low multidetector computed tomography doses and iterative reconstruction techniques affect subjective classification of bone type at dental implant sites? Int J Prosthodont 2018; 31: 465-70. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5773
  8. Widmann G, Juranek D, Waldenberger F, Schullian P, Dennhardt A, Hoermann R, et al. Influence of ultra-low-dose and iterative reconstructions on the visualization of orbital soft tissues on maxillofacial CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017; 38: 1630-5. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A5239
  9. Boice JD Jr. Welcome to the Fiftieth Annual Meeting of the NCRP: achievements of the past 50 years and addressing the needs of the future. Health Phys 2015; 108: 111-4. https://doi.org/10.1097/HP.0000000000000242
  10. Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W. Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194: 191-9. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.2953
  11. Al-Ekrish AA, Alzahrani A, Zaman MU, Alfaleh W, Hormann R, Widmann G. Assessment of potential reduction in multidetector computed tomography doses using FBP and SAFIRE for detection and measurement of the position of the inferior alveolar canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2020; 129: 65-71.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2019.09.002
  12. Al-Ekrish AA, Al-Shawaf R, Schullian P, Al-Sadhan R, Hormann R, Widmann G. Validity of linear measurements of the jaws using ultralow-dose MDCT and the iterative techniques of ASIR and MBIR. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2016; 11: 1791-801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-016-1419-y
  13. Al-Ekrish AA, Al-Shawaf R, Alfaleh W, Hormann R, Puelacher W, Widmann G. Comparability of dental implant site ridge measurements using ultra-low-dose multidetector row computed tomography combined with filtered back-projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction. Oral Radiol 2019; 35: 280-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-018-0350-z
  14. Al-Ekrish AA, Alfadda SA, Ameen W, Hormann R, Puelacher W, Widmann G. Accuracy of computer-aided design models of the jaws produced using ultra-low MDCT doses and ASIR and MBIR. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2018; 13: 1853-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1809-4
  15. Widmann G, Fasser M, Schullian P, Zangerl A, Puelacher W, Kral F, et al. Substantial dose reduction in modern multi-slice spiral computed tomography (MSCT)-guided craniofacial and skull base surgery. Rofo 2012; 184: 136-42. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1281971
  16. Duan X, Wang J, Christner JA, Leng S, Grant KL, McCollough CH. Dose reduction to anterior surfaces with organ-based tube-current modulation: evaluation of performance in a phantom study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 197: 689-95. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.6061
  17. Sakai Y, Kitamoto E, Okamura K, Takarabe S, Shirasaka T, Mikayama R, et al. Low-radiation dose scan protocol for preoperative imaging for dental implant surgery using deep learning-based reconstruction in multidetector CT. Oral Radiol 2022; 38: 517-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-021-00584-w
  18. Hofmann E, Schmid M, Lell M, Hirschfelder U. Cone beam computed tomography and low-dose multislice computed tomography in orthodontics and dentistry: a comparative evaluation on image quality and radiation exposure. J Orofac Orthop 2014; 75: 384-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00056-014-0232-x
  19. Kyriakou Y, Kolditz D, Langner O, Krause J, Kalender W. Digital volume tomography (DVT) and multislice spiral CT(MSCT): an objective examination of dose and image quality. Rofo 2011; 183: 144-53. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1245709
  20. Veldhoen S, Schollchen M, Hanken H, Precht C, Henes FO, Schon G, et al. Performance of cone-beam computed tomography and multidetector computed tomography in diagnostic imaging of the midface: a comparative study on phantom and cadaver head scans. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 790-800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4387-2
  21. Widmann G, Al-Shawaf R, Schullian P, Al-Sadhan R, Hormann R, Al-Ekrish AA. Effect of ultra-low doses, ASIR and MBIR on density and noise levels of MDCT images of dental implant sites. Eur Radiol 2017; 27: 2225-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4588-8