DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Systematic Review of Eco-CMF Design Processes for Fashion Products

체계적 문헌 고찰을 통한 패션 제품의 친환경 CMF 디자인 프로세스 분석

  • So Hyun Lee (Dept. of Textiles, Merchandising and Fashion Design, Seoul National University) ;
  • Sukyung Kang (Dept. of Textiles, Merchandising and Fashion Design, Seoul National University) ;
  • Sungjin Park (Dept. of Textiles, Merchandising and Fashion Design, Seoul National University) ;
  • Young A Koh (Dept. of Textiles, Merchandising and Fashion Design, Seoul National University) ;
  • Juyeon Park (Dept. of Textiles, Merchandising and Fashion Design, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2022.12.31
  • Accepted : 2023.02.10
  • Published : 2023.02.28

Abstract

An eco-CMF design process is vital to the sustainable development of fashion products concerning both emotional and physical quality factors, thus extending the use phase of the product life cycle. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is widely used in other fields to evaluate environmental impact; However, the method is rarely adopted in fashion. While cooperating with design, technology, and the users, reflecting the CMF design process is an excellent approach to the sustainable development of fashion products. Moreover, it is likely to evoke favorable reactions in users toward products. Therefore, this study aimed to review the sustainable design strategies associated with CMF in the fashion industry. Using a systematic review, 135 papers that met the inclusion criteria were examined from peer-reviewed journal articles published between 1990 and 2022. They contained specific design processes or tools relevant to eco-CMF design. The search used the Web of Science database. After a rigorous search, the final six peer-reviewed journal articles were selected and underwent thorough content reviews. Then, the CMF design tools and frameworks for eco-design featured in the articles were carefully reviewed and analyzed. Finally, we proposed practical guidelines for the sustainable development of eco-CMF design in the fashion industry. The study outcomes revealed the need for concrete eco-CMF design processes, particularly for fashion products. Furthermore, more active research involving eco-CMF design processes for the sustainable environmental impact of fashion products is required.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2022년도 정부(산업통상자원부)의 재원으로 국가 연구개발사업의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(No. 350-20220052).

References

  1. Akter, M. M. K., Haq, U. N., Islam, M. M., & Uddin, M. A. (2022). Textile-apparel manufacturing and material waste management in the circular economy - A concept model to achieve sustainable development goal (SDG) 12 for Bangladesh. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 4, 100070. doi:10.1016/j.cesys.2022.100070
  2. Aus, R., Moora, H., Vihma, M., Unt, R., Kiisa, M. & Kapur, S. (2021). Designing for circular fashion - Integrating upcycling into conventional garment manufacturing processes. Fashion and Textiles, 8, 1-8. 34. doi:10.1186/s40691-021-00262-9
  3. Bhaduri, G., & Ha-Brookshire, J. E. (2011). Do transparent business practices pay? Exploration of transparency and consumer purchase intention. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 29(2), 135-149. doi:10.1177/0887302X11407910
  4. Cha, I. S., & Han, J. I. (2016). The characteristics of upcycling product design. Journal of Korea Design Forum, (53), 341-352. doi:10.21326/ksdt.2016..53.029
  5. Chambers, M. & Muecke, M. (2010). Biobased products and the LEED® rating system. Journal of Green Building, 5(4), 91-107. doi:10.3992/jgb.5.4.91
  6. Chapman, J. (2010). Clean design good design (S. W. Bang, Trans.). Seoul: Sigongart. (Original work published 2005)
  7. Choi, J. G., Han, S. H., & Lee, Y. K. (2014). Development of an evaluation index for eco-design. Korea Environmental Policy and Administration Society, 22(4), 169-193. doi:10.15301/jepa.2014.22.4.169
  8. Chon, Y. (2012). An analysis of participatory textile design approaches aspiring emotional sustainability. Journal of Korea Design Forum, 37, 211-222. doi:10.21326/ksdt.2012..37.018
  9. Color Marketing Group. (n. d.). CMF designers accentuate the form. Retrieved December 30, 2022 from https://colormarketing.org/2018/05/18/cmf-design-what-is-it/
  10. Earley, R., & Goldsworthy, K. (2017). Playing for time - Seven practice-led workshop tools for making design decisions to extend the life of fashion textile materials and products. Proceedings of the product lifetimes and the environment conference. Delft, Netherlands. doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-820-4-127
  11. 'Eco design guide'. (2003, March 4). Ministry of Environment. Retrieved December 20, 2022, from https://www.me.go.kr/home/web/policy_data/read.do?pagerOffset=0&maxPageItems=10&maxIndexPages=10&searchKey=title&searchValue=%EB%94%94%EC%9E%90%EC%9D%B8&menuId=10259&orgCd=&condition.toInpYmd=null&condition.fromInpYmd=null&condition.deleteYn=N&condition.deptNm=null&seq=1136
  12. Han, S. L. C., Chan, P. Y. L., Venkatraman, P., Apeagyei, P., Cassidy, T., & Tyler, D. J. (2017). Standard vs. upcycled fashion design and production. Fashion Practice, 9(1), 69-94. doi:10.1080/17569370.2016.1227146
  13. International Organization for Standardization. (2002). Environmental management - Integrating environmental aspects into product design and development (ISO/TR 14062:2002). Retrieved December 18, 2022, from https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:tr:14062:ed-1:v1:en
  14. Jeon, J. C. (2004). A study on the eco-design trend in product design. Journal of Basic Design & Art, 5(1), 261-271.
  15. Karaosman, H., Perry, P., Brun, A., & Morales-Alonso, G. (2020). Behind the runway - Extending sustainability in luxury fashion supply chains. Journal of Business Research, 117, 652-663. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.09.017
  16. Kam, S., & Yoo, Y. (2022). Practice of sustainable fashion design considering customer emotions and personal tastes. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 976471. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.976471
  17. Kim, S., & Nah, K. (2013). The development direction of emotional materials by increasing sensorial experiences: Focusing on the case study of CMF design. Korean Society of Design Science, 27(2), 121-135. doi:10.15187/adr.2014.05.110.2.121
  18. Kim, S. B., & Lee, K. H. (2008). A study on the aesthetic characteristics of recycle fashion. Fashion & Textile Research Journal, 10(4), 436-444.
  19. Kim, Y. (2015). Cross comparing the decode methods for applying quantitative environmental engineering results into the design process by adopting the ecodesign strategy wheel. Industrial Design, 9(4), 83-92.
  20. Korean institutes of design promotion. (2021, February 26). Green design/ sustainable design. designdb. Retrieved September 5, 2022, from https://www.designdb.com/usr/upload/board/zboardphotogallery248/ 20210401015902145_2723.0.pdf
  21. Kwan, J. S. (2012). Based on the perspective of sustainability, the characteristics of upcycle fashion design. Fashion and Textile Research Journal, 14(1), 13-23. doi:10.5805/KSCI.2012.14.1.013
  22. Ljungberg, L. Y. (2007). Materials selection and design for development of sustainable products. Materials & Design, 28(2), 466-479. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2005.09.006
  23. McDonough, W., & Braungart, M. (2002). Cradle-to-cradle, remaking the way we make things. New York: North Point Press.
  24. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Galtman, D. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ, 339. b2535. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535
  25. Moorhouse, D. (2020). Making fashion sustainable - Waste and collective responsibility. One Earth, 3(1), 17-19. doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2020.07.002
  26. Mukherjee, S. (2015). Environmental and social impact of fashion - Towards an eco-friendly, ethical fashion. International Journal of Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Studies, 2(3), 22-35. https://doi.org/10.4038/ijms.v2i1.59
  27. Whitty, J. (2021). Fashion design for holistic systems. In Muthu, S. S., & Gardetti, M. A. (Eds.), Sustainable Design in Textiles and Fashion. Sustainable Textiles: Production, processing, manufacturing & chemistry (pp. 1-22). Singapore: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-2466-7_1
  28. Norman, D. A. (2010). Emotional design (K. W. Park, Y. S. Lee, D. S. Choi, Trans.). Seoul: Hakjisa. (Original work published 2005)
  29. Oh, S. (2017). From an ecodesign guide to a sustainable design guide - Complementing social aspects of sustainable product design guidelines. Archives of Design research, 30(2), 47-65. doi:10.15187/adr.2017.05.30.2.47
  30. Park, M. H. (2016). A study on emotional scale for surface design - Focusing on CMF design process of industrial design. Unpublished master's thesis, Korea University, Seoul.
  31. Payne, A. (2011). The life-cycle of the fashion garment and the role of Australian mass market designers. The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 7(3), 237-246. doi:10.18848/1832-2077/CGP/v07i03/54938
  32. Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2008). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470754887
  33. Ryoo, H. Y., & Kim, S. A. (2019). Verification and improvement of the CMF design process of cosmetics by evaluating emotional concordance survey. Korea Society of Basic Designs & Art, 20(4), 133-146. doi:10.47294/KSBDA.20.4.10
  34. Suh, H. S. (2013). A study on the methods of approaching eco fashion design from the perspective of system and chaos. Journal of The Korean Society of Fashion Design, 13(4), 137-155.
  35. Sustainable Apparel Coalition. (n. d.). Higgs Index. Retrieved September 16, 2022, from http://www.apparelcoalition.org/the-higg-index
  36. Shou, M., & Domenech, T. (2022). Integrating LCA and blockchain technology to promote circular fashion - A case study of leather handbags. Journal of Cleaner Production, 373, 133557. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133557
  37. Son, S. R., & Kim, J. H. (2004). A study of fashion design in the view of ecological environment. The Korean Society of Fashion Design, 4(1), 23-34.
  38. Toprak, T., & Anis, P. (2017). Textile industry's environmental effects and approaching cleaner production and sustainability, an overview. Journal of Textile Engineering & Fashion Technology, 2(4), 429-442. doi:10.15406/jteft.2017.02.00066