한국문헌정보학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science)

한국문헌정보학회 (Korean Society For Library And Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

대학도서관의 연구성과분석 서비스 현황에 관한 연구 - 연구성과분석 시스템을 중심으로 -

A Study on the Status of Research Performance Analysis Services in University Libraries: Focusing on the Research Performance Management System

  • 김주섭 (전북대학교 문헌정보학과, 연구데이터융복합연구소) ;
  • 김나원 (연세대학교 의학도서관) ;
  • 임현아 (전북대학교 중앙도서관) ;
  • 김선태 (전북대학교 문헌정보학과 )
  • 투고 : 2023.04.24
  • 심사 : 2023.05.21
  • 발행 : 2023.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

연구 경쟁력이 대학의 미래이자 국가의 미래이다. 본 연구는 대학도서관이 연구성과분석 서비스를 도입하여 수행하고자 할때 고려사항을 제시하고 분석 솔루션의 선택 가이드라인을 제안하기 위함이다. 본 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위하여 6개의 대학도서관 업무 담당자를 인터뷰하였고 4개의 연구성과분석 솔루션을 비교하였다. 인터뷰 내용에는 서비스 추진 배경, 서비스 내용, 구독 솔루션, 서비스 제공범위 및 제공방법 등이 포함되어 있다. 분석 대상으로 선택된 연구성과분석 솔루션은 InCite, SciVal, RIMS 그리고 Scholytics이다. 4개의 솔루션을 분석한 결과 대부분의 소프트웨어가 연구성과분석 서비스 업무를 수행하는 데 필요한 기능을 가지고 있으며 일반적으로 분석 목적에 따라 솔루션을 구독하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구 결과는 대학도서관에서 연구성과분석 서비스를 수행하기 위한 참고자료로 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Research competitiveness is the future of the university and the future of the country. This study is to present considerations when university libraries introduce and perform research performance analysis services and to propose guidelines for selection of analysis solutions. In order to achieve the purpose of this study, 6 university library staff were interviewed and 4 research performance analysis solutions were compared. The contents of the interview include the background of service promotion, service content, subscription solution, service provision scope and provision method. The research performance analysis solutions selected for analysis are InCite, SciVal, RIMS and Scholytics. As a result of analyzing the four solutions, it was found that most of the software has the necessary functions to perform research performance analysis service tasks, and generally subscribed to the solution according to the purpose of analysis. The results of this study can be used as reference materials for performing research performance analysis services in university libraries.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cho, Donghwan & Shim, Hyoung-Seop (2010). A study on the construction design of the university's professor performance evaluation management system: focusing on the case of J university's achievement evaluation management system construction. Korean Management Information Society 2010 Autumn Conference, 546-549.
  2. Joo, Hye-yeon (2022). Research performance analysis and research achievement management system S-RIMS. Library Bulletin, 144, 60-72.
  3. Kang, Jihei, Lee, Jongwook, Kim, Yonghwan, & Noh, Younghee (2022). A study on the improvement for professor research achievement evaluation applying a case study of foreign universities. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 53(4), 211-232. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.53.4.202212.211
  4. Kim, Soojung, Lee, Jae Yun, & Lee, Ji Won (2021). A model for the development and operation of research evaluation services in academic libraries in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 38(3), 287-309. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2021.38.3.287
  5. Kim, Wonchan (2017). Analysis of research achievements and research trends of Seoul National University. Library Bulletin, 139, 45-65.
  6. Kim, Yonghwan, Kang, Jihei, Lee, Jongwook, & Noh, Younghee (2022). A study on faculty perception of research performance evaluation. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 56(4), 309-333. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2022.56.4.309
  7. Lee, Yongjae & Lee, Jiwook (2020). A study on the present stage of research support services of academic library in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 51(1), 305-327. https://10.4275/KSLIS.2020.54.2.155
  8. Ministry of Education (2019). The 2nd Comprehensive University Library Promotion Plan (draft) (2019-2023). Available: https://policy.nl.go.kr/search/searchDetail.do?rec_key=SH2_PLC20190232749
  9. Yu, Soyoung, Lee, Jaeyun, Chung, Eunkyung, & Lee, Boram (2015). A review of declarations on appropriate research evaluation for exploring their applications to research evaluation system of Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(4), 249-272. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.4.249
  10. Acquaviva, K. D., Mugele, J., Abadilla, N., Adamson, T., Bernstein, S. L., Bhayani, R. K., Buchi, A. E., Burbage, D., Carroll, C. L., Davis, S. P., Dhawan, N., Eaton, A., English, K., Grier, J. T., Gurney, M. K., Hahn, E. S., Haq, H., Huang, B., Jain, S., Jun, J., … & Trudell, A. M. (2020). Documenting social media engagement as scholarship: a new model for assessing academic accomplishment for the health professions. Journal of medical Internet research, 22(12), e25070. https://doi.org/10.2196/25070
  11. Argonet (2023. 03. 02.). 연구학술성과 관리 및 분석. 출처: https://argonet.co.kr/
  12. Clarivate (2023, March 5). InCites (Clarivate). Available: http://incites.clarivate.com/
  13. Elsevier (2023, March 8). Welcome to SciVal. Available: https://www.scival.com/
  14. Guixue Hu (2016). Analytic solutions of college scientific achievement assessment. Proceedings of 2016 5th International Conference on Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. http://doi.org/10.2991/ssehr-16.2016.169
  15. Johng, S. Y., Mishori, R., & Korostyshevskiy, V. R. (2021). Social media, digital scholarship, and academic promotion in US medical schools. Family Medicine, 53(3), 215-219. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2021.146684
  16. Lewis, R., Cathy C. S., & Amy M. S. (2015). Scholarly Output Assessment Activities. SPEC Kit 346. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries. Available: https://publications.arl.org/Scholarly-Output-Assessment-SPEC-Kit-346/
  17. Scholytics (2023. 03. 06.). Scholytics. Available: https://scholytics.net/