한국지진공학회논문집 (Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea)

  • 제27권2호
  • /
  • Pages.83-90
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1226-525X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-1099(eISSN)
한국지진공학회 (Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

원거리와 근거리 지진파의 특성을 고려한 항만 컨테이너 크레인의 지진취약도 분석

Seismic Fragility Analysis of Container Crane Considering Far-Fault and Near-Fault Ground Motion Characteristics

  • 박주현 (인하대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 민지영 (한국건설기술연구원 구조연구본부) ;
  • 이종한 (인하대학교 사회인프라공학과)
  • Park, Ju-Hyun (Department of Civil Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Min, Jiyoung (Department of Structural Engineering Research, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology) ;
  • Lee, Jong-Han (Department of Civil Engineering, Inha University)
  • 투고 : 2022.11.30
  • 심사 : 2023.01.04
  • 발행 : 2023.03.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The recent increase in earthquake activities has highlighted the importance of seismic performance evaluation for civil infrastructures. In particular, the container crane essential to maintaining the national logistics system with port operation requires an exact evaluation of its seismic response. Thus, this study aims to assess the seismic vulnerability of container cranes considering their seismic characteristics. The seismic response of the container crane should account for the structural members' yielding and buckling, as well as the crane wheel's uplifting derailment in operation. The crane's yielding and buckling limit states were defined using the stress of crane members based on the load and displacement curve obtained from nonlinear static analysis. The derailment limit state was based on the height of the rail, and nonlinear dynamic analysis was performed to obtain the seismic fragility curves considering defined limit states and seismic characteristics. The yield and derailment probabilities of the crane in the near-fault ground motion were approximately 1.5 to 4.7 and 2.8 to 6.8 times higher, respectively, than those in the far-fault ground motion.

키워드

과제정보

본 논문은 산업통상자원부 및 한국산업기술평가관리원(KEIT) 활용서비스 패키지 구축 및 운용사업(20011780)의 한국건설기술연구원 지원에 의해 수행되었으며, 이에 감사드립니다.

참고문헌

  1. Korea Meteorological Administration. Historical earthquake records in Korea (2~1904). Korea Meteorological Administration.
  2. Chang SE. Urban disaster recovery: a measurement framework and its application to the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Disasters. 2010 Aug; 34(2):303-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7717.2009.01130.x
  3. Soderberg E, Hsieh J, Dix A. Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering Conference; 2009 Jun 28-Jul 2; Oakland, OA. California. 1-11.
  4. Kosbab. Seismic performance evaluation of port container cranes allowed to uplift[dissertation]. [Georgia (GA)]:Georgia Institute of Technology; c2010.
  5. Kim IH, Gong YS, Sun CH. Seismic fragility analysis for harbor crane. The Society of Naval Architects of Korea. 2012 May;5:2242-2245.
  6. Tran QH, Huh J, Nguyen VB, Kang C, Ahn JH, Park IJ. Sensitivity Analysis for Ship-to-Shore Container Crane Design. Applied Sciences. 2018 Sep;8(9):1667.
  7. HJ Shipbuilding and Construction. Gwangyang port 61ton container crane structure and machinery division. c2014.
  8. Park JH. Seismic fragility analysis of concrete gravity-type harbor wall and container crane considering soil-structure interaction and seismic characteristics[master's thesis]. [Incheon (ICN)]: Inha University; c2021.
  9. Japanese Industrial Standards. JIS G 3106: Rolled steels for welded structure. Japanese Industrial Standards. c2004.
  10. Chopra AK. Dynamics of structures: theory and applications to earthquake engineering, 4th ed. New Jersey: Chopra Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs. c2001.
  11. Kim HS, Song JG. Effect of near- and far-fault earthquakes for seismic fragility curves of PSC box girder bridges. EESK J. Earthquake Eng. 2010 Oct;14(5):53-64. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2010.14.5.053
  12. Nguyen V, Huh J, Meisuh B, Kim J, Park I. Seismic response of container crane under near-field and far-field ground motions. Applied Sciences. 2021 Feb;11(4):1740.
  13. Vafaei D, Eskandari R. Seismic response of mega buckling-restrained braces subjected to fling-step and forward-directivity near-fault ground motions. The structural design of Tall and Special Buildings. 2014 Dec;24(9):672-686. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1205
  14. Bhandari M, Bharti SD, Shrimali MK, Datta TK. The numerical study of base-isolated buildings under near-field and far-field earthquakes. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. 2017 Mar;22(6):989-1007. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1269698
  15. Ministry of Oceans and Fishes. Special act on the safety and maintenance of facilities. Ministry of Oceans and Fishes. c2016.
  16. Somervill P, Smith H, Puriyamurthala S, Sun J. Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project. c1997.
  17. HAZUS, Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology. Technical Manual. Prepared by the National Institute of Building Sciences for Federal Emergency Management Agency. c1997.
  18. Park HS, Choi BH, Kim JJ, Lee TH. Seismic performance evaluation of transmission towers in south Korea. Journal of the Computational Structural Engineering Institute of Korea, 2015;28(4):30-37.
  19. Cornell CA, Jalayer F, Hamburger RO, Foutch DA. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering. 2002 Apr;128(4):526-533. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526)
  20. An H, Shin S, Lee JH. Seismic fragility analysis of a bridge system considering the correlation of components of the PSC bridge. EESK J. Earthquake Eng. 2021 Nov;25(6):267-274. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2021.25.6.267
  21. Celik OC, Ellingwood BR. Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames-role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Struct. Saf. 2010 Jan;32(1):1-12 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.04.003