DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationship between Hospital Safety Symbol Shapes and Memory

병원 안전 심볼의 형태와 기억과의 관계

  • Seok-Hwan Bae (Department of Radiological Science, Konyang University) ;
  • Myung-Chul Park (Department of Public Health, The Graduate School, Konyang University) ;
  • Jae-Sang You (Department of Communication Design, Hongik University) ;
  • Yong-Gwon Kim (Department of Radiological Science, Konyang University) ;
  • Cheul-Ho Ryoo (Department of Visual Design, Konyang University) ;
  • Dong-Hyun Oh (Department of Radiology, Konyang University Hospital)
  • 배석환 (건양대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 박명철 (건양대학교 일반대학원 보건학과) ;
  • 유재상 (홍익대학교 커뮤니케이션디자인학과) ;
  • 김용권 (건양대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 류철호 (건양대학교 시각디자인학과) ;
  • 오동현 (건양대학교병원 영상의학과)
  • Received : 2023.02.28
  • Accepted : 2023.04.03
  • Published : 2023.04.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the association between the shapes and colors of emergency exit symbols, magnetic field warning symbols, and radiation zone symbols used in hospitals for staff and patient safety and their effects on cognitive memory. The hippocampal region's signal intensity(SI) was analyzed using fMRI. The Symbol 2 (1.75±0.54) with a green background had the highest signal intensity (SI) for emergency exits, according to the findings. The black symbol 2 (1.60±0.51) with a yellow background had the highest signal intensity (SI) for the magnetic field warning symbol, followed by the black symbol 1 (1.59±0.65) with an orange background. The black symbol 2 (1.59±0.59) with a yellow background and the black symbol 3 (1.58±0.52) with an orange background had the low signal intensity with slight differences as for the radiation zone symbols. In conclusion, it was determined that the signal intensity of the black symbol with a yellow background was the highest in the magnetic field area and radiation area. This implies that symbols with a high signal intensity (SI) must be utilized intensively. To ensure that the correct meaning of the symbols is communicated in the future, they must also be utilized regularly and continually in disaster safety education.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017S1A5A2A03067618)

References

  1. Dewar RE. Design and evaluation of public information symbols. Visual information for everyday use. Design and Research Perspectives. 1999:285-303.
  2. Park WS. Analysis of visual perception types represented in symbols [dissertation]. HyeJeon College; 1998;16:191-205.
  3. Park JS. An Empirical Study on the Semiotic Taxonomy of ISO Graphical Symbols Focused on the Comprehensibility of a Safety Sign in Symbolic Representation. Journal of Korea Society of Design Science. 2010;89(23):3.
  4. Park HS, Kim MJ, Kim DJ. Graphic symbol development strategy by disaster type. Journal of Disaster Prevention. 2022;24(4):87-93.
  5. Park JS. A Study of International Standardization Procedure and Testing Method for Graphical Symbols. Journal of Korean Society of Design Science. 2008;21(78):5-19.
  6. Kim HS. Comprehensibility of healthcare symbols: The effects of user skills and expression feature of symbol [master's thesis]. Graduate School of Yonsei University; 2016.
  7. Kim EJ. international language, graphic symbol, How You Can Reduce Your Risk, 'safety signs and graphic symbol'. The Monthly Technology and Standards. ISO Focus; 2012.
  8. International Standard for Safety Colors and Safety Signs: ISO 3864. Geneva, Switzerland.
  9. McDougald BR, Wogalter MS. Facilitating Pictorial Comprehension with color highlighting. Applied Ergonomics. 2014;45(5):1285-90.
  10. Occupational Safety and Health Act Enforcement Rules. Chromaticity standards and uses of safety and health signs. 2008;Article 38 Paragraph 3.
  11. Kang EJ, Lee JM. Mapping brain function and understanding information processing. The Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers. 2000;27:75-87.
  12. Gabrieli JDE. Cognitive neuroscience of human memory. Annu. Rev. Psychology. 1998;49:87-115. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.87
  13. Mayes AR, Montaldi D. The neuroimaging of long-term memory encoding processes. Memory. 1999;7:613-59. https://doi.org/10.1080/096582199387788
  14. Fletcher PC, Henson RN. Frontal lobes and human memory: Insights from functional neuroimaging. Brain. 2001;124:849-81. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.5.849
  15. Yancey SW, Phelps EA. Functional neuroimaging and episodic memory: A perspective. J Clin Exp Neuropasychol. 2001;23:32-48. https://doi.org/10.1076/jcen.23.1.32.1220
  16. Ryoo CH. Effects of Pictures and words on communication design. Journal of Basic Design & Art. 2006;7(3):215-59.
  17. Kang EJ. Functional neuroanatomy of associative memory in healthy normal and epilepsy patients: PET and fMRI studies. The Korean Journal of Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. 2002;14(4):243-56.
  18. Yoon SD, Park HW. Magenetic Resonance Imaging and functional MRI Mapping. The Magazine of the Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers. 2009;36(11):93-102.
  19. Lee YM, et al. Basics of MR. Academy; 2020.
  20. Kim JH. Statistical analysis issues for fMRI data. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society. 2018;29(6):1353-63. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2018.29.6.1353
  21. Moon CH, Ryoo JW, Na DG, Lee EJ, Byun HS. A Study of Optimal SOAmin for Motor and Language Tasks in Event-related fMRI using Stochastic Design. Journal of Korean Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2002;6:28-34.
  22. Kinateder M, Warren WH, Schloss KB. What Color are Emergency Exits-Signs Egress Behavior Differs form Verbal Report. Applied Ergonomics. 2019;75:155-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.010
  23. Oh RS, Choi JH. Development of Standards for Production of an Exit Sign Lighting to Minimize Huuman Reaction Time. Fire Science and Engineering. 2020;34(6):51-58. https://doi.org/10.7731/KIFSE.14541cb4
  24. Kim YS. Evacuation on the Form of Sign System Researchs-About Exit Sign for the Color, Shape, and Location. The Korea Society of Illustration Research. 2009;19:66-77.
  25. Bower GH, Karlin MB, Dueck A. Comprehension and memory for pictures. Memory & Cognition. 1975;3(2):216-20. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03212900
  26. Lee JH. A Study on the Characteristics of Plant Fiber Materials for Diffusion Tensor Imaging Phantom. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2020;43(6):475-80. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2020.43.6.475
  27. Min JW, Jeong HW, Han JH, Lee SN, Han SY, Kim KW, et al. Study on the Resolution Characteristics by Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging 3.0T. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2020;43(4):251-7. https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2020.43.4.251