DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

PRICING AMERICAN LOOKBACK OPTIONS UNDER A STOCHASTIC VOLATILITY MODEL

  • Donghyun Kim (Department of Mathematics Pusan National University) ;
  • Junhui Woo (Department of Mathematics Pusan National University) ;
  • Ji-Hun Yoon (Department of Mathematics Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.02.19
  • 심사 : 2022.05.02
  • 발행 : 2023.03.31

초록

In this study, we deal with American lookback option prices on dividend-paying assets under a stochastic volatility (SV) model. By using the asymptotic analysis introduced by Fouque et al. [17] and the Laplace-Carson transform (LCT), we derive the explicit formula for the option prices and the free boundary values with a finite expiration whose volatility is driven by a fast mean-reverting Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process. In addition, we examine the numerical implications of the SV on the American lookback option with respect to the model parameters and verify that the obtained explicit analytical option price has been obtained accurately and efficiently in comparison with the price obtained from the Monte-Carlo simulation.

키워드

과제정보

The research of J.-H. Yoon was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea grants funded by the Korean government (NRF-2019R1A2C108931011).

참고문헌

  1. J. Abate and W. Whitt, A unified framework for numerically inverting Laplace transforms, INFORMS J. Comput. 18 (2006), no. 4, 408-421. https://doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.1050.0137 
  2. A. Agarwal, S. Juneja, and R. Sircar, American options under stochastic volatility: control variates, maturity randomization & multiscale asymptotics, Quant. Finance 16 (2016), no. 1, 17-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2015.1068443 
  3. F. Black and M. Scholes, The pricing of options and corporate liabilities, J. Polit. Econ. 81 (1973), no. 3, 637-654. https://doi.org/10.1086/260062 
  4. P. Carr, Randomization and the American put, Rev. Financ. Stud. 11 (1998), no. 3, 597-626.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/11.3.597
  5. S.-Y. Choi, J.-P. Fouque, and J.-H. Kim, Option pricing under hybrid stochastic and local volatility, Quant. Finance 13 (2013), no. 8, 1157-1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2013.780209 
  6. S.-Y. Choi, V. Sotheara, J.-H. Kim, and J.-H, Yoon, A Mellin transform approach to the pricing of options with default risk, Comput. Economics (2021), Online published. 
  7. S.-Y. Choi, J.-H. Yoon, and J. Jeon, Pricing of fixed-strike lookback options on assets with default risk, Math. Probl. Eng. 2019 (2019), Art. ID 8412698, 10 pp. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8412698 
  8. A. Conze and R. Viswanathan, Path dependent options: The case of lookback options, J. Finance 46 (1991), no. 5, 1893-1907.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb04648.x
  9. M. Dai, A closed form solution to perpetual American floating strike lookback option, J. Comput. Finance 4 (2000), no. 2, 63-68.  https://doi.org/10.21314/JCF.2001.074
  10. M. Dai and Y. K. Kwok, American options with lookback payoff, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 66 (2005), no. 1, 206-227. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036139903437345 
  11. M. Dai and Y. K. Kwok, Characterization of optimal stopping regions of American Asian and lookback options, Math. Finance 16 (2006), no. 1, 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9965.2006.00261.x 
  12. M. Dai, H. Y. Wong, and Y. K. Kwok, Quanto lookback options, Math. Finance 14 (2004), no. 3, 445-467. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0960-1627.2004.00199.x 
  13. J.-P. Fouque, G. Papanicolaou, and R. Sircar, Financial modelling in a fast mean-reverting stochastic volatility environment, Asia-Pacific Financial Markets 6 (1999), no. 1, 37-49.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010010626460
  14. J.-P. Fouque, G. Papanicolaou, and R. Sircar, Mean-reverting stochastic volatility, Intern. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 3 (2000), no. 1, 101-142.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219024900000061
  15. J.-P. Fouque, G. Papanicolaou, and K. R. Sircar, From the implied volatility skew to a robust correction to Black-Scholes American option prices, Int. J. Theor. Appl. Finance 4 (2001), no. 4, 651-675. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219024901001139 
  16. J.-P. Fouque, G. Papanicolaou, R. Sircar, and K. Solna, Singular perturbations in option pricing, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 63 (2003), no. 5, 1648-1665. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036139902401550 
  17. J.-P. Fouque, G. Papanicolaou, R. Sircar, and K. Solna, Multiscale stochastic volatility for equity, interest rate, and credit derivatives, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139020534 
  18. D. P. Gaver, Jr., Observing stochastic processes, and approximate transform inversion, Operations Res. 14 (1966), 444-459. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.14.3.444 
  19. M. B. Goldman, H. B. Sosin, and M. A. Gatto, Path dependent options: Buy at the low, sell at the high, J. Finance 34 (1979), no. 5, 1111-1127. 
  20. S. L. Heston, A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options, Rev. Financ. Stud. 6 (1993), no. 2, 327-343. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/6.2.327 
  21. M. Kang, J. Jeon, H. Han, and S. Lee, Analytic solution for American strangle options using Laplace-Carson transforms, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul. 47 (2017), 292-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.11.024 
  22. I. Karatzas and S. E. Shreve, Brownian motion and stochastic calculus, second edition, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 113, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0949-2 
  23. T. Kimura, Valuing finite-lived Russian options, European J. Oper. Res. 189 (2008), no. 2, 363-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.05.026 
  24. T. Kimura, American fractional lookback options: valuation and premium decomposition, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 71 (2011), no. 2, 517-539. https://doi.org/10.1137/090771831 
  25. T. Kimura, Applications of the Laplace-Carson transform to option pricing: A tutorial, Kyoto University Research Information Repository 1983 (2016), 68-89. 
  26. T. Kimura, A refined Laplace-Carson transform approach to valuing convertible bonds, J. Oper. Res. Soc. Japan 60 (2017), no. 2, 50-65. https://doi.org/10.15807/jorsj.60.50 
  27. A. Kuznetsov, On the convergence of the Gaver-Stehfest algorithm, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 51 (2013), no. 6, 2984-2998. https://doi.org/10.1137/13091974X 
  28. M.-K. Lee, Pricing perpetual American lookback options under stochastic volatility, Comput. Econ. 53 (2019), 1265-1277.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-017-9782-5
  29. K. S. Leung, An analytic pricing formula for lookback options under stochastic volatility, Appl. Math. Lett. 26 (2013), no. 1, 145-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2012.07.008 
  30. A. G. Ramm, A simple proof of the Fredholm alternative and a characterization of the Fredholm operators, Amer. Math. Monthly 108 (2001), no. 9, 855-860. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695558
  31. H. Stehfest, Algorithm 368: Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms, Communications of the ACM 13 (1970), 47-49.  https://doi.org/10.1145/361953.361969
  32. L. N. Tao, The analyticity and general solution of the Cauchy-Stefan problem, Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 36 (1983), no. 4, 487-504. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmam/36.4.487 
  33. H. Y. Wong and C. M. Chan, Lookback options and dynamic fund protection under multiscale stochastic volatility, Insurance Math. Econom. 40 (2007), no. 3, 357-385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.insmatheco.2006.05.006 
  34. H. Y. Wong and Y. K. Kwok, Sub-replication and replenishing premium: Efficient pricing of multi-state lookbacks, Rev. Deriv. Res. 6 (2003), no. 2, 83-106.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027377228682
  35. H. Y. Wong and J. Zhao, Valuing American options under the CEV model by Laplace-Carson transforms, Oper. Res. Lett. 38 (2010), no. 5, 474-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2010.07.006 
  36. Z. Zhou and H. Wu, Laplace transform method for pricing American CEV strangles option with two free boundaries, Discrete Dyn. Nat. Soc. 2018, Art. ID 5908646, 12 pp. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5908646 
  37. S.-P. Zhu and W.-T. Chen, Pricing perpetual American options under a stochastic-volatility model with fast mean reversion, Appl. Math. Lett. 24 (2011), no. 10, 1663-1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aml.2011.04.011