Informatization Policy (정보화정책)

National Information Society Agency (한국지능정보사회진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Study of US-China Discourse on Cross-border Data Regulation and Cybersecurity: Focusing on ASEAN Development Assistance Cases

미·중 초국경 데이터 규제와 사이버안보 담론 비교: 아세안 개발원조 사례를 중심으로

  • Kayeon Lee (Center for East Asian Studies, Sungshin Women's University)
  • Received : 2023.01.17
  • Accepted : 2023.02.24
  • Published : 2023.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Science, technology and innovation (STI) has expanded the activity of actors from the traditional physical territory to the cyberspace. Data-driven platform services and markets advance new discussions on cross-border cooperation and cyber security, as well as discourse on sovereignty in cyberspace. These changes are also affecting the hegemony competition between the US and China. In particular, competition for aid to developing countries that are located along major resource transportation routes, such as natural gas and deep sea resources, is fierce. ASEAN is not only a geopolitical military and security point where the US and China powers collide, but its population of 600 million has great potential for the development of the digital economy due to its data resources. In this regard, this article aims to connect the discourse of liberalism and authoritarianism with data regulation and cybersecurity in international development cooperation, and derive implications for ASEAN integration through this. This study has significance as a convergence study that links international political issues related to big data in terms of global governance.

과학기술혁신은 행위자들의 활동을 전통적인 물리적 영토에서 사이버 영역으로 확장했다. 데이터 기반의 플랫폼 서비스와 시장은 사이버 공간의 주권에 대한 담론뿐 아니라 초국경 협력과 사이버 안보에 대한 새로운 논의를 진전시킨다. 이러한 변화는 미국과 중국의 패권 경쟁에도 영향을 미치고 있다. 특히 천연가스나 심해자원과 같은 주요 자원 수송로에 위치한 개도국에 대한 원조 경쟁이 치열하다. 아세안은 미·중의 강대국이 충돌하는 지정학적인 군사·안보의 요지일 뿐만 아니라 6억 명에 이르는 인구는 데이터 자원으로 인해 디지털 경제의 발전 가능성이 크다. 이에 이 논문은 국제개발협력에서 자유주의와 권위주의 담론을 데이터 규제 및 사이버안보와 연계하고, 이를 통해 아세안 통합에 대한 함의를 도출하고자 한다. 본 연구는 글로벌 거버넌스의 측면에서 빅데이터와 관련한 국제정치적 사안들을 연계하는 융합 연구의 의의가 있다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020S1A5B5A17090430).

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2014). "ASEAN Dilemma: Courting Washington without Hurting Beijing." Asia Pacific Bulletin, 133, East-West Center.
  2. Brand, C. (2005). "Belgian PM: Data Transfer Broke Rules," The Washington Post, September
  3. Chander, A. & Le, U. (2015). "Data Nationalism." Emory Law Journal, 64(3), 701.
  4. Chang, W., Gil, J., Kim, J., Min, H. & Choi, J. (2021). "Political Participation and Decision-Making in an Era of Digital Transformation and Innovations in Legislature and Party Politics." Broadcast and Communications Policy Studies, 2021-0-00008, 38-58.
  5. Cho, H. (2015). Information Sovereignty in the Network Era and the Role of the State (Presentation). National Assembly Research Service, paper presented at National Research Foundation Joint Academic Forum, Big Data, Personal Information Protection and Establishment of Information Sovereignty.
  6. Choi, J. (2022). "The Politics of Internet Content Regulation in the U.S.: A Case Study on Communications Decency Act Section 230 Reform with New Institutionalist Approach." Information Policy, 29(3), 48-60.
  7. Choi, K & Hwang, Y. (2022). "China's 'ODA-like' and Political Corruption: Focusing on the Case of ECRL in Malaysia." The Southeast Asian review, 32(4), 119-158. https://doi.org/10.21652/KASEAS.32.4.202211.119
  8. Gladstone, R. (2012). "Iran Praises Nuclear Talks with Team from U.N.," The New York Times, January 13.
  9. GSMA. (2018). Regional Privacy Frameworks and Cross-Border Data Flows. How ASEAN and APEC can Protect Data and Drive Innovation. London: GSMA.
  10. GSMA. (2019). Operationalising the ASEAN Framework on Digital Data Governance- A Regulatory Pilot Space for Cross-Border Data Flows-. London: GSMA.
  11. Cho, C. (2015). "Instead of extending the Patriot Act, the Freedom Act...," Hankook Ilbo, June 3.
  12. Hong, M. (2021). "China's Southern Railway Expansion is not All Good News for Laos." Hankyoreh. December 21. https://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_international/1023847.html
  13. Hutton, R. (2014). "U.K. Wants EU to Block Russia From SWIFT Banking Network," Bloomberg News. August
  14. Hyeon, D. "The Current Situation and Prospect on the US Cyber Risk Management and Relevant Legislation." Dankook Law Review, 33(1), 3-39.
  15. Ikenberry, G. John.2001. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order After Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  16. Jacquez, T. (2016). "Cryptocurrency the new money laundering problem for banking, law enforcement, and the legal system." Master's Thesis, Science in Cybersecurity, Utica College.
  17. Jeong, A. (2019). "Review of requirements for transborder flow of personal information." Public Law Journal, 20(2), 209-244. https://doi.org/10.31779/PLJ.20.2.201905.008
  18. Katzenstein, P. (2005). A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
  19. Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (1975). "International Integration and Interdependence." In F. Greenstein & N. Polsby (Eds.), Handbook of political science, 363-414.
  20. Keohane, R. (2005). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton Classic Editions.
  21. Kim, K. (2021). "U.S. Economic Sanctions on Virtual Currency - Focusing on Recent Cases." Financial Law 14(2), 265-300.
  22. Krapohl, S. (2017). Regional Integration in the global South: External Influence on Economic Cooperation in ASEAN, MECOSUR and SADC. Palgrave Macmillan.
  23. Kim, H. (2017). "A Study on the Legal Issues of Data Attributes and Localization Norms." Public land law review, 78, 1-48.
  24. Koh, H. (2012). Remarks at USCYREBERCOM Inter-Agency Legal Conference.
  25. Korea Internet & Security Agency. (2021). 2021 Privacy Report. Naju: Korea Internet & Security Agency.
  26. Kruger, P. (2016). "Datensouveranitat und Digitalisierung." ZRP, 190.
  27. Ky, S., Lee, C. & Stauvermann, P. (2012). "A Comparative Study on Characteristics of ODA of China-Japan-Korea to Cambodia." Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, 16(4), 333-361. https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.2012.16.4.254
  28. LA Times. (2006). "Belgian Panel Finds SWIFT Deal With U.S. Violates EU Privacy Law," September 29. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-sep-29-fg-swift29-story.html
  29. Lee, K. (2020). "Global Digital Standards Cooperation and Data Governance: Human Rights and Development in the Digital Age." International Area Studies Review(IASR), 24(3), 177-199. https://doi.org/10.21212/IASR.24.3.8
  30. Lee, S. (2021). "The Main Contents and Implication of China's Data Security Law: Focused on the Key System for Data Security." China Knowledge Network, 17, 451-501.
  31. Long, B. (2020). "On the eight major challenges of digital currency" Journal of Translation from Foreign Literature of Economics, 4, 60-100.
  32. Lor, J. J. (2019). "A Study of Intra-ASEAN Trade: An analysis of its indicators, determinants and implications." Master's Thesis, Seoul National University.
  33. Mckinsey & Company. (2021). Joining the next generation of digital banks in Asia.
  34. Maeil Economy (2021). "Google, Apple, Amazon, Facebook split... U.S. House of Representatives Proposes Strong Antitrust Law." June 13.
  35. Malvenda, M. (2019). The RCEP: Impacting ASEAN's Supply Chains and Business Environment. December 27.
  36. National Information Society Agency (2018). "The Rise of Data Sovereignty and the Transformation of Data Utilization Paradigm." IT&Future Strategy, 5, 1.
  37. OMB(Office of Management and Budget). "Federal Data Strategy." https://strategy.data.gov/background/#how-were-the-principles-created
  38. Park, J. (2020). "The Normative Status of the Principle of Sovereignty and Cybersecurity." The Studies of International Affairs, 20(1), 79-114.
  39. Reuters. (2022). "Factbox: What is China's onshore yuan clearing and settlement system CIPS?" Feb 28. https://www.reuters.com/markets/europe/what-is-chinas-onshore-yuan-clearing-settlement-system-cips-2022-02-28/#:~:text=WHAT%20IS%20CIPS%3F,banks%20in%20offshore%20yuan%20hubs.
  40. Song, Y. (2018). "Passage of the CLOUD Act and Its Implications for Law Enforcement Access to Extraterritorial Data." Korean criminological review, 29(2), 149-172.
  41. Schmitt, M. (2013). (ed.), Tallinn Manual 2.0 on the International Law Applicable to Cyber Warfare. Cambridge University Press.
  42. The ASEAN Secretariat. (2016). MASTER PLAN ON ASEAN CONNECTIVITY 2025.
  43. The Asian Banker. (2020). Are central banks issuing digital banking licences to counter the threat of fintechs and big techs? Rise of digital banking licences special report, 3. Singapore: The Asian Banker.
  44. WEF. (2020). Connecting Digital Economies: Policy Recommendations for Cross-Border Payments. Geneva: WEF.
  45. Watts, S. and Richard, T. (2018). "Baseline Territorial Sovereignty and Cyberspace." Lewis & Clark Law Review, 22(803), 861.
  46. Weber, M. (1919). Politics as a Vocation. Seoul: Moonye Publishing.
  47. World Economic Forum. (2018). "Addressing E-Payment Challenges in Global E-Commerce." White Paper. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Addressing_E-Payment_Challenges_in_Global_E-Commerce_clean.pdf
  48. Wilson, J. (2020). "RCEP will redraw the economic and strategic map of the Indo-Pacific," 21 https://www.aspistrategist.org.au/rcep-will-redraw-the-economic-and-strategic-map-of-the-indopacific/
  49. Yang, Y. & Lee, H. (2021). Introduction of Platform Antitrust Act in the US and its Implications. KDI Focus.
  50. Yi, C. (2021). "A Study on Legal Issues of Data Portability and the Direction of Legislative Policy." Information Policy, 28(4), 54-75.
  51. Yoon, S. & Kwon, H. (2021). "Analysis of the Global Data Law & Policy and its Implications: Focusing on the cases of the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union." Informatization Policy, 28(2), 98-113. https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2021.28.2.098
  52. Unpublished: "Articles 17.17 and 17.18 of the USMCA trade agreement." https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/files/agreements/FTA/USMCA/Text/17-Financial-Services.pdf
  53. Unpublished: "ASEAN Digital Masterplan 2025." (2021).https://asean.org/book/asean-digital-masterplan-2025/
  54. Unpublished: Browser Market Share Worldwide July 2021 - July 2022, https://gs.statcounter.com/browser-market-share/
  55. Unpublished: Cheng, C. (2019). "The Logic Behind China's Foreign Aid Agency." Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. https://carnegieendowment.org/2019/05/21/logic-behind-china-s-foreign-aid-agency-pub-79154
  56. Unpublished: Edit Chart Data. (2021-22). Search Engine Market Share Worldwide July 2021 - July 2022. https://gs.statcounter.com/search-engine-market-share.
  57. Unpublished: Government of Canada. Information Technology Strategic Plan 2016-2020. https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/services/information-technology/information-technology-strategy.html
  58. Unpublished: H.R.4943 - 115th Congress (2017-2018). https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/4943
  59. Unpublished: Southeast Asia digital, social and mobile 2019, https://aseanup.com/.
  60. Unpublished: Stored Communications Act 2703(2nd Circuit). (2016). In re Warrant to Search a Certain Email Account Controlled & Maintained by Microsoft Corp., Case No. 14-2985
  61. Unpublished: WTO, GATS, in subparagraph 5(a)(xv) of the Annex on Financial Services. https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/10-anfin_e.htm