Informatization Policy (정보화정책)

National Information Society Agency (한국지능정보사회진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Municipal Ordinances for Smart Cities of Municipal Governments: Using Topic Modeling

지방자치단체의 스마트시티 조례 분석: 토픽모델링을 활용하여

  • Hyungjun Seo (Center for Security Convergence & e-Governance, Inha Univ. )
  • Received : 2022.10.24
  • Accepted : 2022.11.29
  • Published : 2023.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to reveal the direction of municipal ordinances for smart cities, while focusing on 74 municipal ordinances from 72 municipal governments through topic modeling. As a result, the main keywords that show a high frequency belong to establishment and operations of the Smart City Committee. From the result of topic modeling Latent Dirichlet Allocation(LDA), it classifies municipal ordinances for smart cities into eight topics as follows: Topic 1(security for process of smart cities), Topic 2(promotion of smart city industry), Topic 3(composition of a smart city consultative body for local residents), Topic 4(support system for smart cities), Topic 5(management for personal information), Topic 6(use of smart city data), Topic 7(implementation for intelligent public administration), and Topic 8(smart city promotion). As for topic categorization by region, Topics 5, 6, and 8 which are mostly related to the practical operation of smart cities have a significant portion of municipal ordinances for smart cities in the Seoul metropolitan area. Then, Topics 2, 3, and 4 which are mostly related to the initial implementation of smart cities have a significant portion of municipal ordinances for smart cities in provincial areas.

본 연구는 72개 지자체의 74개 스마트시티 조례를 대상으로, 지자체 스마트시티 조례의 방향성을 확인하고자 토픽모델링을 활용하여 조례의 주요 키워드를 확인하고, 조례의 키워드에 따른 주제분류를 진행하였다. 분석결과 주요 키워드는 스마트도시위원회의 구성 및 운영에 관한 키워드가 조례 내에서 높은 빈도를 보였다. 조례에 대한 토픽모델링 Latent Dirichlet Allocation(LDA) 분석결과 관련 키워드에 따라 총 8개의 주제로 분류할 수 있었다. 구체적으로 주제-1(스마트시티 추진사항 보안), 주제-2(스마트시티 산업진흥), 주제-3(스마트시티 주민협의체 구성), 주제-4(스마트시티 추진체계 지원), 주제-5(개인정보 관리), 주제-6(스마트시티 데이터 활용), 주제-7(지능정보화 행정구현), 주제-8(스마트시티 홍보) 등으로, 주제의 비중은 주제-6, 주제-4, 주제-1 등의 순으로 나타났다. 권역별 주제분류는 수도권은 주제-5, 주제-6, 주제-8 의 비중이 높았고, 지방권은 주제-2, 주제-3, 주제-4의 비중이 높아 수도권은 스마트시티의 실질 운영 관련 주제가 높았고, 지방권은 스마트시티 추진을 위한 준비단계 관련 주제 비중이 높았다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF-2022S1A5C2A03093690)

References

  1. ACUS (2020). US Government by Algorithm: Artificial Intelligence in Federal Administrative Agencies.
  2. Bakici, T., Almirall, E. & Wareham, J. (2013). "A smart city initiative: the case of Barcelona." Journal of the knowledge economy, 4(2), 135-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0084-9
  3. Belanche, D., Casalo, L. V. & Orus, C. (2016). "City attachment and use of urban services: Benefits for smart cities." Cities, 50, 75-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.08.016
  4. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y. & Jordan, M. I. (2003). "Latent dirichlet allocation." the Journal of machine Learning research, 3, 993-1022.
  5. Bosch, P., Jongeneel, S., Rovers, V., Neumann, H. M., Airaksinen, M. & Huovila, A. (2017). CITY keys indicators for smart city projects and smart cities. CITYkeys report.
  6. Chong, M., Habib, A., Evangelopoulos, N., & Park, H. W. (2018). "Dynamic capabilities of a smart city: An innovative approach to discovering urban problems and solutions." Government Information Quarterly, 35(4): 682-692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.07.005
  7. Gore, A. (1993). Creating a Government that Works Better and Costs Less: Reengineering Through Information Technology. Report of the National Performance Review. Washington DC: Government Printing Office.
  8. Ha, Y. (2006). "Theoretical Evolution of the New Institutionalism and Policy Studies." Korean Journal of Public Administration, 44(2), 217-24. 
  9. Ha, H. & Kim, Y. (2021). "Current Status and Future Task of Local Extinction Crisis." NARS Legislation & Policy, 85, Seoul: National Assembly Research Service. 
  10. Hossain, M. D., Moon, J., Kim, J. K. & Choe, Y. C. (2011). "Impacts of organizational assimilation of e-government systems on business value creation: A structuration theory approach." Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 10(5), 576-594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2010.12.003
  11. Howlett, M. (2009). "Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: Lessons from Canada." Canadian public administration, 52(2), 153-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1754-7121.2009.00070_1.x
  12. Huston, S., Rahimzad, R. & Parsa, A. (2015). "'Smart' sustainable urban regeneration: Institutions, quality and financial innovation." Cities, 48, 66-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.005
  13. Hwang, J. & Jang, J. (2016). "Smart City Development Prospects and Korea's Competitiveness." IT & Future Strategy, Vol 6, Daegu: National Information Society Agency. 
  14. Ingwersen, P. & Serrano-Lopez, A. E. (2018). "Smart City Research 1990-2016." Scientometrics, 117(2), 1205-1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2901-9
  15. Ismail, M. H., Khater, M. & Zaki, M. (2017). Digital business transformation and strategy: What do we know so far. Cambridge Service Alliance, 10.
  16. ITU. (2016). Recommendation ITU-T Y.4900/L.1600.
  17. ITU-T. (2014). ITU-T Focus Group on Smart Sustainable Cities: Smart sustainable cities: An analysis of definitions.
  18. Jang, H. & Kim, K. (2019). "Policy Directions for Citizen-led Smart City Based on Living Lab." Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 22(2), 13-22.  https://doi.org/10.21189/JKUGS.22.2.2
  19. Jang, K. (2013). "Foreign Smart City Craze and Implication." IT & Future Strategy, Vol 11, Seoul: National Information Society Agency. 
  20. Jin, S. (2019). "Life Satisfaction Depending on Digital Utilization Divide within People with Disabilities." Informatization Policy, 26(3), 69-89.  https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2019.26.3.069
  21. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y. & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). "Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government." Information systems management, 29(4), 258-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
  22. Joint Ministries (2018). Basic Idea and Future Plan for National Demonstration of Smart City. 
  23. Joo, Y., Kim, Y., Oh, J. & Suh, W. (2021). "A Study on the Priorities of Initiatives for the Implementation of Smart Cities: An Analysis on the Perception of Public Officials, A Study on the Priorities of Initiatives for the Implementation of Smart Cities: An Analysis on the Perception of Public Officials." Journal of Korean Associastion for Regional Information Society, 24(1), 95-125. 
  24. Kim, E. (2019). "Topic Trends and Research Structure Analysis of Korea' Disaster and Safety Management Adopting Keyword Network Analysis." Korean Public Administration Quarterly, 31(3), 555-580.  https://doi.org/10.21888/KPAQ.2019.9.31.3.555
  25. Kim, T. (2020). "COVID-19 News Analysis Using News Big Data: Focusing on Topic Modeling Analysis." The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 20(5), 457-466.  https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2020.20.05.457
  26. Kim, H. & Lee, M. (2018). "A Study on the Connectivity between the Smart City Comprehensive Plan and Smart City Planning Using the Social Network Analysis: Focusing on Gwangmyeong and Chuncheon Smart City Services." Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, 36(6), 601-609. 
  27. Kim. (2022). "Smart City Policy Promotion and Gyeonggi-do Strategy." Journal of Digital Convergence, 20(4), 55-62.  https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2022.20.4.055
  28. Kim, S. (2007). "A Study on the Theories of New Institutionalim and the Adaptation for the Public Administrarion : Forcused on Historical Institutionalism." Zeitschrift der Koreanisch-Deutschen Gesellschaft fuer Sozialwissenschaften, 17(1), 211-239. 
  29. Kim, Y. (2016). "Research on Direction of Data Based Policy Making." Intelligent Research Series, Daegu: National Information Society Agency. 
  30. Ko, I., Ahn, J. & Kang, S. (2018). "Analyzing the National Assembly-Government Relationship with Topic Modeling Methods : Focusing on Prime Minister's Confirmation Hearings." Journal of Parliamentary Research, 13(2), 5-28.  https://doi.org/10.18808/jopr.2018.2.1
  31. Lee, J. & Han, S. (2017). "The Meanings and Future Agendas of the Act on Smart City Law Revision." Journal of the Korean Urban Geographical Society, 20(3), 91-101.  https://doi.org/10.21189/JKUGS.20.3.7
  32. Lee, J. (2015). "Method for Data Evidence Based Scientific Policy Making." IT & Future Strategy, Vol 6, Daegu: National Information Society Agency. 
  33. Lee, J., Lee, B., Lee, S., Han, S., Shin, J., Shin, Y. & Yoo, I. (2016). Research on Policy for Enhancing Comepetiviness of Smart City. Seoul: Korea Research Institute for Human Settlements. 
  34. Lee, S. (2017). "Review the Necessity of Amending Related Laws and Enactment of Ordinances for Smart City Activation." Public Land Law Review, 79, 583-609. 
  35. Lim, C., Cho, G. H. & Kim, J. (2021). "Understanding the linkages of smart-city technologies and applications: Key lessons from a text mining approach and a call for future research." Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170: 120893.
  36. Lowi, T. (1979). The End of Liberalism. New York: Norton.
  37. Mehr, H. (2017). Artificial Intelligence for Citizen Services and Government. Harvard Ash Center.
  38. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2019). 3rd Smart City Comprehensive Plan.
  39. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2021a). Notice for Local Based Smart Sity Project. 
  40. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (2021b). Notice for Small and Medium-Sized Smart City Project. 
  41. Ministry of Public Administration and Security (2022). Manual for Self Governing Law. 
  42. Moir, E., Moonen, T. & Clark, G. (2014). What are future cities? Origins, meanings and uses. Compiled by The Business of Cities for the Foresight Future of Cities Project and the Future Cities Catapult. London: Government Office for Science, Foresight.
  43. Nam, T. & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions. In proceedings of the 12th annual international digital government research conference: digital government innovation in challenging times (pp. 282-291).
  44. OECD (2020). Smart Cities and Inclusive Growth.
  45. Oh, J. & Kang, J. (2022). "Research Trends of Sustainable Smartcity in South Korea using Keyword Network Analysis." The Journal of Korean Career.Entrepreneurship & Business Association, 6, 69-87.  https://doi.org/10.48206/kceba.2022.6.1.69
  46. Olson, M. (1982). The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  47. Park, C. & Byeon, N. (2013). "Civil servants' Perceptions of the Influence and Activity of Interest groups in local Policy Process : A Comparative Study of Seoul Metropolitan Government and Its Municipalities." The Korea Local Administration Review, 27(3), 129-15. 
  48. Park, G. & Lee, C. (2019). "A Study on the Research Trends for Smart City using Topic Modeling." Journal of Internet Computing and Services, 20(3), 119-128.  https://doi.org/10.7472/JKSII.2019.20.3.119
  49. Park, S., Ahn, J. & Lee, M. (2021). "A Study on the Development Direction of Smart City Ordinances to Revitalize City Data Management throughout the Smart City Life." Journal of Korean Society for Geospatial Information Science, 29(4), 83-95.  https://doi.org/10.7319/kogsis.2021.29.4.083
  50. Park, H., Kim, D. & Jang, S. (2019). "Research Trend Analysis on Smart City based on Structural Topic Modeling." Journal of Digital Contents Society, 20(9), 1839-1846.  https://doi.org/10.9728/dcs.2019.20.9.1839
  51. Partridge, H. L. (2004). Developing a human perspective to the digital divide in the smart city. In Proceedings of Australian Library and Information Association Biennial Conference 2004, September 21.
  52. Puri, M., Du, X., Varde, A. S. & De Melo, G. (2018). Mapping ordinances and tweets using smart city characteristics to aid opinion mining. In Companion Proceedings of the The Web Conference 2018, April 23.
  53. Reuter, T. K. (2020). Smart City Visions and Human Rights: Do They Go Together?. Cambridge: Carr Center for Human Rights Policy Harvard Kennedy School.
  54. Seo, H. (2019). "A Preliminary Discussion on Policy Decision Making of AI in The Fourth Industrial Revolution." Informatization policy, 26(3), 3-35.  https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2019.26.3.003
  55. Seo, H. (2021a). "The Determinant Factors on Behavior of Information Security in Public Sector: Focusing on Mediating Effect of Perception of Information Security." The Korean Journal of Public Administration, 30(2), 173-207. 
  56. Seo, H. (2021b). "Online Civic Engagement in Government as a Platform: Focusing on Petitions about COVID-19 in Incheon eun SotongeGadeug with Using Topic Modeling." Korean Journal of Urban Studies, 20, 39-78. 
  57. Seo, H. & Joo, Y. (2020). "Informatization Case against to COVID-19 in Korean Government With Perspective of Government as a Platform: Focusing on ICT and Data Usage." Korean Public Administration Quarterly, 32(4), 759-796.  https://doi.org/10.21888/KPAQ.2020.12.32.4.759
  58. Seo, H. & Myeong, S. (2014). "Conflict Process and Policy Implications of NEIS Case using Frame Analysis." Informatization policy, 21(3), 56-84.  https://doi.org/10.22693/NIAIP.2014.21.3.056
  59. Seo, H. & Myeong, S. (2020). "Analysis and Policy Alternatives for Blockchain Projects in Public Sector: Focusing on Informatization Implementation Plan in Metropolitan Local Governments." Korean Policy Sciences Review, 24(2), 73-97.  https://doi.org/10.31553/kpsr.2020.6.24.2.73
  60. Seo, H. & Myeong, S. (2021). "An Exploratory Study on Development of Smart City Complementary Evaluation Index based on the CITIE Framework: Focusing on Relieving for Risk Factors in the City." Journal of Korean Association for Regional Information Society, 24(3), 73-112. 
  61. Seo, H. & Myeong, S. (2022). "Effects of Application of Information on the Expectations of Benefits from GaaP: Moderating Effects from Perceptions of IIT." Sustainability, 14(3), 1624.
  62. Son, H. (2017). "A Study on the Ordinances of Smart Parking system." Public Law Journal, 18(3), 375-400.  https://doi.org/10.31779/PLJ.18.3.201708.014
  63. Souza, J. T. D., Francisco, A. C. D., Piekarski, C. M. & Prado, G. F. D. (2019). "Data mining and machine learning to promote smart cities: A systematic review from 2000 to 2018." Sustainability, 11(4), 1077.
  64. PwC. (2019). Creating the smart cities of the future.
  65. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division (2019). World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision (ST/ESA/SER.A/420). New York: United Nations.
  66. Washburn, D., Sindhu, U., Balaouras, S., Dines, R. A., Hayes, N. & Nelson, L. E. (2009). "Helping CIOs understand 'smart city' initiatives." Growth, 17(2), 1-17.
  67. Yang, Y. (2021). "Analysis on Types and Trends of Public Conflicts using Topic Modeling." The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, The Korea Local Administration Review, 35(2), 159-188. 
  68. Yang, Y., Kwon, Y. & Lee, S. (2019). "Research Trends Analyses on Public Conflicts through Topic Modeling and Network Analysis." The Korean Journal of Local Government Studies, 23(3), 427-450.  https://doi.org/10.20484/klog.23.3.18
  69. Yoshikawa, Y., Sato, A., Hirasawa, S., Takahashi, M. & Yamamoto, M. (2012). "Hitachi's vision of the smart city." Hitachi Review, 61(3), 111-118.
  70. Zhao, W., Chen, J. & Zen, W. (2015). Best practices in building topic models with LDA for mining regulatory textual documents. In proceedings of CDER 9th November.