East Asian mathematical journal

  • 제39권2호
  • /
  • Pages.183-198
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1226-6973(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-2833(eISSN)
영남수학회 (The Youngnam Mathematical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수학 교사의 수업실천역량 향상을 위한 수업관찰도구의 역할

The Role of Classroom Observation Instruments in Supporting Mathematics Teachers' Instructional Change

  • Noh, Jihwa (Department of Mathematics Education Pusan National University)
  • 투고 : 2023.02.15
  • 심사 : 2023.02.23
  • 발행 : 2023.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Classroom observation instruments are often used to evaluate teachers' instructional practices and provide feedback to inform interventions or research studies, or professional development efforts. While designed as research tools, many classroom observation instruments can provide important information to support teachers' learning and instructional change by providing a focus for formative assessment or self-evaluation of practice. In this paper, we review two classroom observation tools and the protocols for their use with an implementation example for one of the tools. These tools are more foreign to the field compared to others but have features that might serve as affordances in relation to the purposes of a specific investigation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김구연(2020), 수학 수업 관찰 및 분석 연구. 2019 수학교육정책과제 최종보고서, 한국과학창의재단 BD-2002-0004.
  2. 노지화(2019). 수학 수업 분석 실습 프로그램 개발. 2018 수학교육정책과제 최 종보고서. 한국과학창의재단 BD-1904-0003.
  3. 심상길 (2013). 교사의 지식에 대한 중등 초임수학교사들의 인식 분석, 학교수학, 15(2), 443-457.
  4. 유한구(2014). 수업 전문성의 두 측면: 기술과 이해. 한국교원교육연구, 18(1), 69-84.
  5. 이윤미, 이상은, 박상완(2022). 미래 사회변화에 따른 교사역할에 대한 초.중등학교 교사의 인식. 교육학연구, 60(6), 399-428.
  6. 장순선, 이옥화, 김득준(2022). 수업관찰유형에 따른 수업전문성 요인 차이 분석. 교육공학연구, 34(3), 441-465.
  7. 전병운(2004). 수업 관찰 및 분석의 실제. 자격연수, 2, 481-504.
  8. 진영은, 함영기(2009). 수업 전문성 재개념화 연구 동향 및 과제. 열린교육연구, 17(2), 47-71.
  9. 천세영, 이욱화, 정일화, 김득준, 장순선, 방인자, 이재홍, 권현범, 김종수, 이경민, 김지은, 전미애(2020). 좋은 수업을 위한 새로운 수업장학: 수업 분석과 수업 코칭. 서울: 학지사
  10. Alsawaie, O., & Alghazo, I. (2010) The effect of video-based approach on prospective teachers' ability to analyze mathematics teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 13(3), 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-009-9138-8
  11. Bailey, K. M. (2001). Observation. In R. Carter and D. Nunan (Eds), The Cambridge Guide to Teaching English to Speakers of Other Langauage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., & Tsai, Y.-M. (2010). Teachers' mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal, 47, 133-180. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209345157
  13. Chieu, V. M., Herbst, P., & Weiss, M. (2011). Effect of an animated Classroom story embedded in online discussion on helping mathematics teachers learn to notice, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 20(4), 589-624. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.528324
  14. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2011). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching, Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013-1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/0161-4681.00141
  15. Herbst, P., Chazan, D., Chen, C., Chieu, V. M., & Weiss, M. (2011). Using comics-based representations of teaching, and technology, to bring practice to teacher education courses. ZDM Mathematics Education, 43(1), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0290-5
  16. Herbst, P., Chazan, D., Chieu, V. M., Milewski, A., Kosko, K., and Aaron, W. (2016). Technology-Mediated Mathematics Teacher Development: Research on Digital Pedagogies of Practice. In M. Niess, K. Hollebrands, & S. Driskell (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Transforming Mathematics Teacher Education in the Digital Age (pp. 78-106). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
  17. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
  18. Noh, J., & Webb, M. (2015) Teacher Learning of Subject Matter Knowledge Through an Educative Curriculum, The Journal of Educational Research, 108(4), 292-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.886176
  19. Pecheone, R. L. & Chung, R. R. (2010). Evidence in teacher education: The performance assessment for california teachers (PACT). Journal of Teacher Education, 57(1), 22-36.
  20. Praetorius, A.-K., & Charalambous, C. (2018). Classroom observation frameworks for studying instructional quality: looking back and looking forward. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 50(5), 535-553. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0946-0
  21. Sawada, D. Piburn, M. D., Judson, E., Turley, J., Falconer, K., Benford, R., & Bloom, I. (2002). Measuring reform practices in science and mathematics classrooms: The reformed teaching observation protocol. School Science Mathematics, 102(6), 245-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb17883.x
  22. Sherin, M. G., & Russ, R. S. (2015). Effects of video club participation on teachers' professional vision. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328155
  23. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2009). The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom. New York: Free Press.
  24. Tilstone, C. (1998). Observing Teaching and Learning- Principles and Practice. London: David Fulton.
  25. von Glasersfeld, E. (1989). Constructivism in Education. In T. Husen, & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Education (supplementary vol., pp. 162-163). Oxford: Pergamon.