DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Preservice Elementary Teachers' Questions and Practices in Mathematics Teaching and Reflection

초등 예비교사의 수학 수업 실행과 반성

  • Kim, Sangmee (Department of Mathematics Education Chuncheon National University of Education)
  • Received : 2023.02.20
  • Accepted : 2023.02.21
  • Published : 2023.02.28

Abstract

This study examined what questions posed, and for arranging the matters, what decisions made, what practices put into by elementary preservice teachers during his or her enacting and reflecting mathematics teaching. Analysis of the study focused on the mathematics instructions practiced by four participants in practicum for senior students. Their own questions raised by each one in the instructional designs, performances, and reflections were picked out and categorized by five dimensions of mathematics instruction; the nature of classroom tasks, the role of the teacher, the social culture of the classroom, mathematical tools as learning supports, and equity and accessibility. Their instructional decision-makings and action-takings for answering to these questions were analised.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

논문은 2022학년도 춘천교육대학교 대학재정지원사업 연구비 지원을 받아 수행되었음

References

  1. 권성룡 (2015). 초등 예비교사의 수학수업에서의 학습과제의 인지적 수준 분석. 초등수학교육, 18(2), 61-75.
  2. 김상미 (2008). 교사의 자서전을 통한 수학 수업 연구. 수학교육학연구, 18(4), 435-453.
  3. 김해규 (2018). 교육실습에서 수학 수업 실행 횟수에 따른 초등 예비교사의 수학 수업전문성 지식 활용 양상. 한국초등수학교육학회지, 22(1), 1-24.
  4. 남윤석, 전평국 (2006). 교육실습 과정에서 배우는 초등 예비교사의 수학 교수학적 내용 지식에 관한 사례연구. 수학교육, 45(1), 75-96.
  5. 류현아 (2020). 예비초등교사의 수학적 신념과 수업 실제의 관계. East Asian Mathematical Journal, 36(2), 203-227.
  6. 문효영, 권성룡 (2010). 교육실습에서의 수학 수업이 초등예비교사의 수학에 관한 신념에 미치는 영향. 한국초등수학교육학회지, 14(2), 487-521.
  7. 방정숙, 김주현, 최예원, 곽은애, 김정원 (2022). 교사 공동체를 중심으로 한 초등 수학 수업 개선: 효과적인 수학적 논의를 위한 5가지 관행의 적용. 초등수학교육, 25(4), 433-457.
  8. 이영혜, 권종겸, 이봉주 (2013). 교육실습 과정에서 나타난 초등 예비교사의 수학에 대한 교사 효능 신념의 변화. 수학교육학연구, 23(4), 407-422.
  9. 조미경 (2022). 느리게 배우는 학습자를 위한 초등예비교사의 수학수업 설계. 수학교육논문집, 36(2), 287-311.
  10. Eisner, E. W. (2002), The Educational imagination: on the design and evaluation of school programs (3rd ed.), N.J.: Pearson Education, Inc..
  11. Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williams on, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055-2100. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100905
  12. Lee, J. & Dumitrascu, G. (2017). Preservice elementary teachers' perceived preparedness of High-Leverage Practices in mathematics teaching. 초등수학교육, 20(2), 153-162.
  13. Lee, J., Lim, W., & Kim, H. (2016). Lesson planning: How do pre-service teachers benefit from examining lesson plans with mathematics teaching practices as an analytical lens?. 초등수학교육, 19(3), 211-222.
  14. Levine, A. (2006). Educating school teachers: The education schools project. Retrieved from http://www.edschools.org/pdf/Educating_Teachers_Report.pdf.
  15. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Reston, VA: Author.
  16. Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (2018). 5 Practices for orchestrating productive mathematics discussions (2nd ed.). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  17. TeachingWorks (2017). Teaching Works: High-leverage practices. University of Michigan. Retrieved from: http://www.teachingworks.org/work-of-teaching/high-leverage-practices.