한국건설관리학회논문집 (Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management)

  • 제24권2호
  • /
  • Pages.79-87
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2005-6095(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2465-9703(eISSN)
한국건설관리학회 (Korea Institute of Construction Engineering and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

FGI를 활용한 장기계속공사계약 분쟁 개선방안 기초연구

A Study on the Improvement of Long-Term Continuing Construction Contracts Dispute Using FGI

  • Kim, Jae-Sik (Department of Architecture, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Jung-Won (Department of Architecture, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Min-Jae (Department of Civil Engineering, Chungnam National University)
  • 투고 : 2022.12.08
  • 심사 : 2023.03.16
  • 발행 : 2023.03.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

장기계속공사계약은 예산 일년주의 원칙에 충실한 계약으로, 비교적 많은 예산이 수년에 걸쳐 투입되어야 목적물이 완성되는 특성을 가지고 있는 건설공사에서는 적절한 보완대책이 필요한 계약이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 FGI와 조달청의 공사발주 내역 분석을 통해 장기계속공사계약의 문제점과 개선방안을 도출하였다. 장기계속공사계약의 문제점으로는 법률과 대통령령의 정합성 문제, 예산편성의 효율성이라 보기 어려운 계약이 다수 발주되는 문제, 공기연장에 따른 간접비용 산정문제, 최종 차수계약에 예산이 과다하게 투입되는 문제 등이 존재하였다. 이를 해결하기 위해 총공사기간과 총공사금액의 효력을 인정하는 내용과 장기계속공사계약으로 할 수 있는 대상사업 범위를 한정하는 내용을 포함하는 관련법률 개정이 필요하다. 또한, 공사기간 연장시기에 발생되는 간접비용에 대한 산출기준과 적정 공사기간 산정기준을 명확히 할 필요가 있다.

Given that most government contracts are based on a fiscal year, long-term continuing construction contracts require appropriate provisions as significant amounts of budget is supposed to be invested for several years. This study drew problems and improvements of the long-term continuing construction contracts by analyzing the contents of FGI and list of construction order. We found that a number of problems, such as the mismatch between laws and enforcement decrees, difference in calculating overheads due to the extension of construction period, many construction orders that are hard to see as budget efficiency and over investment in the final annual contract, were tangled up in the process. To solve the problems mentioned, we suggested several improvements as follows: (1) effect of total construction period and total amount should be guaranteed by a law, (2) it is suggested that the scope of long-term continuing construction contract is determined by a law, and (3) it should be clear about the calculation of overheads concerned with the extension of construction period as well as the estimation of construction period to prevent over investment in the final contract.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 한국연구재단 이공분야기초연구(NRF-2022R1I1A3068942)에 의해 일부 연구비가 지원되었으며, 이에 감사드립니다.

참고문헌

  1. An, S.H. (2017). "Issues and activation plan of the Construction dispute conciliation System." International journal of negotiation, 20(2), pp. 83-117.
  2. Chang, C.K. (2013). "Suggestions on Efficient Cost Management for Public Construction Projects : Focused on Total Project Cost Management System." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 14(3), pp. 12-21. https://doi.org/10.6106/kJCEM.2013.14.3.012
  3. Cho, Y.J. (2019). "Systematic Improvement for Effective Operation of Long-Term Continuous Construction Contracts." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 20(6), pp. 3-10.
  4. Han, S.J., and Woo, S.K. (2021). "Causes and Directions for Improvement of Additional Industrial Safety and Health Management Expenses due to the Extension od Time." KICEM Annual Conference 2021, pp. 119-120.
  5. Jeong, K.C., and Lee, J.S. (2017). "Improvement of the Calculation Standard for Prolongation cost of Long-term Continuing Contracts Construction Project." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 18(2), pp. 30-37. https://doi.org/10.6106/KJCEM.2017.18.2.030
  6. Jung, Y.C. (2020). "Restructuring of the Legal Theory on the Long-term Continuous Construction Contract under the National Contract Law." Public Law, 48(3), pp. 313-337. https://doi.org/10.38176/PublicLaw.2020.02.48.3.313
  7. Kim, S.B. et al.(2008). "An Empirical Study on the Effect of Public Construction Industry by Expansion of New Budget System." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 9(3), pp. 153-163.
  8. Kim, T.K. (2018). "Study on the right to claim for expenses incurred upon extension of construction period in the construction contract general conditions : Focusing on comparison and examination with creditor delay." DONG-A LAW REVIEW, (78), pp. 275-305.
  9. Kim, T.K. (2021). "Research on the Legal Nature of So-called General Contracts in Long-term Continuous Construction Contracts : Focusing on the Supreme Court 2018. 10. 30. Judgment 2014 Da 235189 en banc decision." Ilkam Law Review, 48(0), pp. 45-82.
  10. Krueger, R.A., and Casey, M.A. (2008). Focus groups : A Practical Guide for Applied Research (4th Edition), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  11. Lee, J.H., and Shin, M.J. (2021). "Legal Issues Concerning the Extension of the Construction Period and the Adjustment of the Contract Price in the Long-term Construction Contract." Ilkam Real Estate Law Review, 23(0) pp. 303-341.
  12. Lee, S.H. (1996). "Problems and Improvement of the Long-Term Continuing Construction Contracts." Construction Economy Research Institute of Korea (CERIK) Issue Focus, 7.
  13. Lee, S.J., Cha, Y.W., Han, S.W., and Hyun, C.T. (2021). "A Rating Method for the Estimation of the Additional Overhead Expenses incurred by Schedule Extension in Public Construction Projects." Korean Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, KICEM, 22(3), pp. 79-90.
  14. Park, S.H., Lee, J.K., Yang, C.H., Lee, J., and Kang, Y.K. (2021). "Derivation of Design Elements for Connection through Urban Underground using FGI Method." International journal of highway engineering, 23(2), pp. 129-136. https://doi.org/10.7855/IJHE.2021.23.2.129
  15. Park, S.W. (2018). "A Short Essay on Overhead Cost and Time Extension Issues in Government Long-Term Continuing Construction Contracts." Korea Law Review, 89, pp. 117-173. https://doi.org/10.36532/kulri.2018.89.117
  16. Song, K. (2018). "A Study on the Purpose of Introducing Long Term Construction Contract." The Graduate School of Railroad Woosong University.
  17. Stewart, D.W., and Shamdasani, P.N. (2014). Focus groups : Theory and Practice (3th Edition), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  18. Ministry of Economy and Finance (MOEF) (2022). Notice on Decision for Disclosure Information (Registration Number : 10042415).
  19. The Board of Audit and Inspection of Korea (BAI) (2018). Audit Reports, Seoul, Korea.