아태비즈니스연구 (Asia-Pacific Journal of Business)

  • 제14권4호
  • /
  • Pages.175-189
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2233-5900(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-3934(eISSN)
강원대학교 경영경제연구소 (KNU The Institute of Management & Economy Research)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

흔하지 않은 이름의 최고경영자와 기업의 연구개발 투자: 최고경영자 특성의 조절 효과를 중심으로

CEOs with Unusual Names and R&D Intensity: Moderating Role of CEO Characteristics

  • Do-Kyun Kwon (Department of Business Administration, Graduate School, Sogang University) ;
  • Seung-Hye Lee (College of Business Administration, Sogang University) ;
  • Yang-Min Kim (College of Business Administration, Sogang University)
  • 투고 : 2023.11.30
  • 심사 : 2023.12.22
  • 발행 : 2023.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose - The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between CEO name uncommonness and R&D intensity while focusing on CEO ownership and CEO tenure as moderators of the relationship. Design/methodology/approach - This study collected data from various American databases such as national data on given names from Social Security Administration, COMPUSTAT, and Execucomp. The sample of this study includes 2,494 (firm-year) observations from U.S. firms between 2005-2011. This study conducts Feasible Generalized Least Square (FGLS) regression analysis to test the hypotheses. Findings - First, we found CEO name uncommonness was positively related to R&D intensity. In other words, CEOs with unusual names prefer being distinctive by increasing R&D investments. Second, we examine the moderating roles of CEO characteristics (i.e., CEO ownership and tenure). The results show that CEO tenure strengthens the positive relationship between CEO name uncommonness and R&D intensity. Research implications or Originality - First, this study extends the CEO characteristics and R&D literature by investigating how CEO name uncommonness affects R&D intensity. In addition, our study also supports the intitutionalization of CEO power arguments by showing that CEOs with unusual names are more likely to pursue distinctive strategies when they have longer tenure. For practical implications, our results allow the investors to better predict corporate future R&D expenses. It suggests that ceteris paribus, CEOs with unusual names, vis-a-vis CEOs with common names, are more likely to increase R&D expenses.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alport, G. W (1937), Personality: A psychological interpretation.
  2. An, D., Y. Song. and M. Carr (2016), "A comparison of two models of creativity: Divergent thinking and creative expert performance", Personality and Individual Differences, 90, 78-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.10.040
  3. Aragon-Correa, J. A. and S. Sharma (2003), "A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy", Academy of Management Journal, 28(1), 71-88.
  4. Balkin, D. B., G. D. Markman, L. R. Gomez-Mejia (2000), "Is CEO pay in high-technology firms related to innovation?", Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1118-1129. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556340
  5. Barker III, V. L. and G. C. Mueller (2002), "CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending", Management Science, 48(6), 782-801.
  6. Bertrand, M. and S. Mullainathan (2004), "Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination", American Economic Review, 94, 991-1013. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002561
  7. Bromiley, P., D. Rau, and Y. Zhang (2017), "Is r & d risky?", Strategic Management Journal, 38(4), 876-891. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2520
  8. Busse, T. V. and L. Seraydarian (1978), "The relationships between first name desirability and school readiness, IQ, and school achievement",, Psychology in the Schools, 15(2), 297-302. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6807(197804)15:2<297::AID-PITS2310150229>3.0.CO;2-9
  9. Chandrasekaran, A., K. Linderman, and R. Schroeder (2015), "The role of project and organizational context in managing high-tech R&D projects", Production and Operations Management, 24(4), 560-586. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12253
  10. Chen, S., H. C. Boucher, and M. P. Tapias (2006), "The relational self revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life", Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 151.
  11. Cohen, W. M. and D. A. Levinthal (1990), "Absortive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation", Administrative Science Quarterly, 128-152.
  12. Conti, R (2014), "Do non-competition agreements lead firms to pursue risky R&D projects?", Strategic Management Journal, 35(8), 1230-1248. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2155
  13. Cotton, J. L., B. S. O'neill, and A. Griffin (2007), "The "name game": Affective and hiring reactions to first names", Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(2), 197-232.
  14. Dess, G. G. and D. W. Beard (1984), "Dimensions of organizational task environments", Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(1), 52-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393080
  15. Diestre, L. and N. Rajagopalan (2012), "Are all 'sharks' dangerous? new biotechnology ventures and partner selection in R&D alliances", Strategic Management Journal, 33(10), 1115-1134. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1978
  16. Figlio, D. N (2005), Names, expectations and the black-white test score gap.
  17. Fryer Jr, R. G. and S. D. Levitt (2004), "The causes and consequences of distinctively black names", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(3), 767-805. https://doi.org/10.1162/0033553041502180
  18. Garwood, S. G., L. Cox, V. Kaplan, N. Wasseman, and J. Sulzer (1980), "Beauty is only "name" deep: The effect of first-name on ratings of physical attraction", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10(5), 431-435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00721.x
  19. Gentry, R. J. and W. Shen (2013), "The impacts of performance relative to analyst forecasts and analyst coverage on firm R&D intensity", Strategic Management Journal, 34(1), 121-130. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1997
  20. Gibbs, P. A. (1993), "Determinants of corporate restructuring: The relative importance of corporate governance, takeover threat, and free cash flow", Strategic Management Journal, 14, 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140906
  21. Golden, B. and E. Zajac (2001), "When will boards influence strategy? Inclination* Inclination* power=strategic change", Strategic Management Journal, 22, 1087-1111. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.202
  22. Hambrick, D. C. and G. D. Fukutomi (1991), "The seasons of a CEO's tenure", Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 719-742. https://doi.org/10.2307/258978
  23. Hambrick, D. C. and P. A. Mason (1984), "Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers", Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
  24. Hoang, H. A. and F. T. Rothaermel (2010), "Leveraging internal and external experience: Exploration, exploitation, and R&D project performance", Strategic Management Journal, 31(7), 734-758. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.834
  25. Hoskisson, R. E. and M. A. Hitt (1988), "Strategic control systems and relative R&D investment in large multiproduct firms", Strategic Management Journal, 9(6), 605-621. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250090607
  26. Hundley, G., C. K. Jacobson, and S. H. Park (1996), "Effects of profitability and liquidity on R&D intensity: Japanese and US companies compared", Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1659-1674. https://doi.org/10.2307/257073
  27. Ito, K. and V. Pucik (1993), "R&D spending, domestic competition, and export performance of Japanese manufacturing firms", Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140107
  28. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling (1976), "Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior agency costs and capital structure", Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  29. Kang, Y., D. H. Zhu, and Y. A. Zhang (2021), "Being extraordinary: How CEOs' uncommon names explain strategic distinctiveness", Strategic Management Journal, 42(2), 462-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3231
  30. Kao, L. and A. Chen (2020), "CEO characteristics and R&D expenditure of IPOs in emerging markets: Evidence from Taiwan", Asia Pacific Management Review, 25(4), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2020.01.001
  31. Keats, B. and M. Hitt (1988), "A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance", Academy of Management Journal, 31, 570-598. https://doi.org/10.2307/256460
  32. Kim, E. H. and Y. Lu (2011), "CEO ownership, external governance, and risk-taking", Journal of Financial Economics, 102(2), 272-292.
  33. Kiss, A. N., A. F. Cortes, and P. Hermann (2022), "CEO proactiveness, innovation, and firm performance", Leadership Quarterly, 33(3), 101545.
  34. Li, F., T. Li, and D. Minor (2016), "CEO power, corporate social responsibility, and firm value: A test of agency theory", International Journal of Managerial Finance, 12(5), 611-628. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJMF-05-2015-0116
  35. Lim, E. N (2015), "The role of reference point in CEO restricted stock and its impact on R&D intensity in high-technology firms", Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 872-889. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2252
  36. Lin, C., P. Lin., F. M. Song, and C. Li (2011), "Managerial incentives, CEO characteristics and corporate innovation in China's private sector", Journal of Comparative Economics, 39(2), 176-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2009.12.001
  37. Markus, H. and S. Cross (1990), "The interpersonal self". In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research, New York: Guilford Press, 576-608.
  38. Mehrabian, A (1992), "Interrelationships among name desirability, name uniqueness, emotion characteristics connoted by names, and temperament", Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(23), 1797-1808. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1992.tb00977.x
  39. Mehrabian, A (2001), "Characteristics attributed to individuals on the basis of their first names", Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 127(1), 59-88.
  40. O'Brien, J. P (2003), "The capital structure implications of pursuing a strategy of innovation", Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 415-431. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.308
  41. Ocasio, W (1994), "Political dynamics and the circulation of power: CEO succession in US industrial corporations, 1960-1990", Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(2), 285-312. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393237
  42. Phan, P. H. and C. W. Hill (1995), "Organizational restructuring and economic performance in leveraged buyouts: An ex post study", Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 704-739. https://doi.org/10.2307/256743
  43. Scoresby, R. B., M. C. Withers, and R. D. Ireland (2021), "The effect of CEO regulatory focus on changes to investments in R&D", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 38(4), 401-420. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12591
  44. Tang, Y., J. Li, and H. Yang (2012), "What I see, what I do: How executive hubris affects firm innovation", Journal of Management, 41(6), 1698-1723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312441211
  45. Tyler, B. B., and T. Caner (2016), "New product introductions below aspirations, slack and R&D alliances: A behavioral perspective", Strategic Management Journal, 37(5), 896-910. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2367
  46. Walton, W. E. (1937), "The affective value of first names", Journal of Applied Psychology, 21(4), 396.
  47. Wang, L., H. Li, and Y. Mu (2022), "Study of CEO narcissism and corporate R&D investment", Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 888618.
  48. Wooldridge, J. M. (2015), Introductory econometrics: A modern approach, Cengage learning.
  49. Zahra, S. A. and G. George (2002), "Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension", Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134351
  50. Zavertiaeva, M. A., F. J. Lopez-Iturriaga, and E. V. Kuminova (2018), "Better innovators or more innovators? Managerial overconfidence and corporate R&D", Managerial and Decision Economics, 39(4), 447-461. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2917
  51. Zulfiqar, M., R. Zhang., N. Khan, and S. Chen (2021), "Behavior towards R&D investment of family firms CEOs: The role of psychological attribute", Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 595-620.
  52. 권도균, 이승혜, 김양민 (2022), "최고경영자의 이름 희소성과 기업 ESG 활동: 특이한 이름의 경영자가 기업의 사회적 활동에 적극적인가?", 전략경영연구, 25(3), 79-104. https://doi.org/10.17786/JSM.2022.25.3.004
  53. 김경묵 (2003), "기업지배구조와 혁신: 소유구조가 연구개발(R&D) 투자에 미치는 영향", 경영학연구, 32(6), 1799-1832.
  54. 김병수, 한인구 (2012), "R&D 조직의 지식 경영 활동이 R&D 성과에 미치는 영향", 지식경영연구, 13(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.15813/KMR.2012.13.1.003
  55. 김일경, 이호욱 (2013), "경영자의 임기가 기업의 성과에 미치는 영향: 경영자 직무 요구의 조절효과를 중심으로", 전략경영연구, 16(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17786/JSM.2013.16.1.001
  56. 김현섭, 송재용 (2011), "기업 소유구조가 연구개발(R&D) 투자에 미치는 영향", 전략경영연구, 14(2), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.17786/JSM.2011.14.2.005
  57. 박지현, 김양민 (2015), "최고경영자와 최고경영진의 특색이 연구개발 투자에 미치는 영향", 전략경영연구, 18(2), 45-73. https://doi.org/10.17786/JSM.2015.18.2.003
  58. 서정일, 장호원 (2010), "최고 경영자(CEO), 최고 경영진(TMT), 기업 소유구조간의 상호작용이 R&D 투자에 미치는 영향", 전략경영연구, 13(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.17786/JSM.2010.13.1.002
  59. 신동엽, 박상찬 (2003), "역량의 탐색과 활용이 R&D 성과에 미치는 영향", 전략경영연구, 6(1), 93-126.
  60. 이승혜, 김양민 (2018), "기업 성과와 열망 수준 간 차이가 연구개발 투자에 미치는 영향: 기업 여유자원, 최고경영자 특성의 조절효과를 중심으로", 연세경영연구, 55(2), 93-123.