Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회지)

The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology (한국환경복원기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of International Research Trends in Green Infrastructure for Coastal Disaster

해안재해 대응 그린 인프라스트럭쳐의 국제 연구동향 분석

  • Song, Kihwan (OJeong Resilience Institute, Korea University) ;
  • Song, Jihoon (OJeong Resilience Institute, Korea University) ;
  • Seok, Youngsun (Department of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Hojoon (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Junga (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University)
  • 송기환 (고려대학교 오정리질리언스 연구원 ) ;
  • 송지훈 (고려대학교 오정리질리언스 연구원 ) ;
  • 석영선 (고려대학교 대학원 환경생태공학과 ) ;
  • 김호준 (고려대학교 환경생태공학부) ;
  • 이정아 (고려대학교 환경생태공학부)
  • Received : 2022.12.15
  • Accepted : 2023.01.17
  • Published : 2023.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Disasters in coastal regions are a constant source of damage due to their uncertainty and complexity, leading to the proposal of green infrastructure as a nature-based solution that incorporates the concept of resilience to address the limitations of traditional grey infrastructure. This study analyzed trends in research related to coastal disasters and green infrastructure by conducting a co-occurrence keyword analysis of 2,183 articles collected from the Web of Science (WoS). The analysis resulted in the classification of the literature into four clusters. Cluster 1 is related to coastal disasters and tsunamis, as well as predictive simulation techniques, and includes keywords such as surge, wave, tide, and modeling. Cluster 2 focuses on the social system damage caused by coastal disasters and theoretical concepts, with keywords such as population, community, and green infrastructure elements like habitat, wetland, salt marsh, coral reef, and mangrove. Cluster 3 deals with coastal disaster-related sea level rise and international issues, and includes keywords such as sea level rise (or change), floodplain, and DEM. Finally, cluster 4 covers coastal erosion and vulnerability, and GIS, with the theme of 'coastal vulnerability and spatial technique'. Keywords related to green infrastructure in cluster 2 have been continuously appearing since 2016, but their focus has been on the function and effect of each element. Based on this analysis, implications for planning and management processes using green infrastructure in response to coastal disasters have been derived. This study can serve as a valuable resource for future research and policy in responding to and managing various disasters in coastal regions.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2018년도 정부(교육부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 기초연구사업임(NRF-2018R1D1A1B07050805). 또한 이 논문은 고려대학교 오정리질리언스연구원의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임.

References

  1. Adger WN. Hughes TP. Folke C. Carpenter SR. and Rockstrom J. 2005. Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science. 309(5737): 1036-1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1112122
  2. Al-Ashmori YY. Othman I. and Rahmawati Y. 2020. Bibliographic analysis of BIM Success Factors and Other BIM Literatures using Vosviewer: A theoretical mapping and discussion. Conference Series: Journal of Physics. 1529(4): 042105.
  3. Badiu DL. Nita A. Ioja CI. and Nita MR. 2019. Disentangling the connections: A network analysis of approaches to urban green infrastructure. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 41: 211-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.04.013
  4. Beatley T. 2012. Planning for coastal resilience: Best practices for calamitous times. Washington: Island Press.
  5. Bijlsma L. Ehler CN. Klein RJT. Kulshrestha SM. McLean RF. Mimura N. Nicholls RJ. Nurse LA. Perez Nieto H. Stakhiv EZ. Turner RK. and Warrick RA. 1995. Coastal Zones and Small Islands. In Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses. Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 289-324.
  6. Caparros-Martinez JL. Milan-Garcia J. Rueda-Lopez N. and de Pablo-Valenciano J. 2020. Green Infrastructure and Water: An Analysis of Global Research. Water. 12(6): 1760.
  7. Chae Y. and Lee S. 2018. Identification of Strategic Fields for Developing Smart City in Busan Using Text Mining. Journal of Digital Convergence. 16(11): 1-15. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.11.001
  8. Chang CW. and Mori N. 2021. Green infrastructure for the reduction of coastal disasters: a review of the protective role of coastal forests against tsunami, storm surge, and wind waves. Coastal Engineering Journal. 63(3): 370-385.
  9. Chavez V. Lithgow D. Losada M. and Silva-Casarin R. 2021. Coastal green infrastructure to mitigate coastal squeeze. Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience. 2(1): 1-12.
  10. Conger T. and Chang SE. 2019. Developing indicators to identify coastal green infrastructure potential: The case of the Salish Sea region. Ocean & Coastal Management 175: 53-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.03.011
  11. European Commission. 2013. An EU strategy on adaptation to climate change. COM (2013) 216 final.
  12. Gedan KB. Kirwan ML. Wolanski E. Barbier EB. and Silliman BR. 2011. The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: answering recent challenges to the paradigm. Climatic change. 106: 7-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-0003-7
  13. Girvan M. and Newman ME. 2002. Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences. 99(12): 7821-7826. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122653799
  14. Griffith AD. 2018. Planning for Coastal Resilience: The Intersection of Theory and Practice. Doctoral degree dissertation. The University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
  15. He Q. 1999. Knowledge Discovery Through Co-Word Analysis. LIBRARY TRENDS 48(1): 133-159.
  16. Heo GE. and Song M. 2013. Examining the Intellectual Structure of a Medical Informatics Journal with Author Co-citation Analysis and Co-word Analysis. Journal of Korean Society for Information Management. 30(2): 207-225.
  17. Holling CS. 1996. Engineering Within Ecological Constraints: Chapter. Engineering Resilience versus Ecological Resilience. Engineering Within Ecological Constraints. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. 31-44.
  18. Huang T. Wu H. Yang S. Su B. Tang K. Quan Z. Zhong W. and Luo X. 2020. Global Trends of Researches on Sacral Fracture Surgery: A Bibliometric Study Based on VOSviewer. SPINE. 45(12): E721-E728. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003381
  19. IUCN. 2021. Nature-based Solutions. https://www.iucn.org/theme/nature-based-solutions. Accessed on 5 Mar 2021
  20. Jeon I. and Lee H. 2016. Exploring the Research Topic Networks in the Technology Management Field Using Association Rule-based Co-word Analysis. Journal of Technology Innovation. 24(4): 101-126. https://doi.org/10.14386/SIME.2016.24.4.101
  21. Jin C. and Eo SH. 2018. Avian research trends in Korea analyzed by text-mining and co-word analysis: based on articles of the Korean Journal of Ornithology. The Korean Journal of Ornithology. 25(2): 126-132. (In Korean) https://doi.org/10.30980/KJO.2018.12.25.2.126
  22. Kim M. and Kwon S. 2022. Analysis of Research Trends in the Hydrogen Energy Field Using Co-Occurrence Keyword Analysis. Explosives and Blasting. 40(3): 1-18.
  23. Kumar P. Debele SE. Sahani J. Aragao L. Barisani F. Basu B. Bucchignani E. Charizopoulos N. Sabatino SD. Domeneghetti A. Edo AS. Finer L. Gallotti G. Juch S. Leo LS. Loupis M. Mickovski SB. Panga D. Pavlova I. Pilla F. and Zieher T. 2020. Towards an operationalisation of nature-based solutions for natural hazards. Science of the Total Environment. 731: 138855.
  24. Lee I. and Kim HJ. 2019. Analyzing the Study Trends of 'Sense of Place' Using Text Mining Techniques. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science. 30(2): 189-209.
  25. Lim YH. Kim SW. Nam S. Chun KW. and Kim M. 2020. A Comparison of Current Trends in Soil Erosion Research Using Keyword Co-occurrence Analysis. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology. 34(5): 413-424. https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2020.34.5.413
  26. Masselink G. and Lazarus ED. 2019. Defining Coastal Eesilience. Water. 11(12): 2587.
  27. McIvor A. Spencer T. Moller I. and Spalding M. 2012. Storm Surge Reduction by Mangroves. Natural Coastal Protection Series: Report 2. Cambridge Coastal Research Unit Working Paper 41. Cambridge: Nature Conservancy and Wetlands International.
  28. Micallef A. and Williams A. 2009. Beach management: Principles and practice. London: Routledge.
  29. Morris RL. Konlechner TM. Ghisalberti M. and Swearer SE. 2018. From grey to green: Efficacy of eco-engineering solutions for nature-based coastal defence. Global change biology. 24(5): 1827-1842. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14063
  30. National Assembly Research Service. 2020. Countermeasures against urban flooding in response to climate change.
  31. Nesshover C. Assmuth T. Irvine KN. Rusch GM. Waylen KA. Delbaere B. Haase D. Jones-Walters L. Keune H. Kovacs E. Krauze K. Kulvik M. Rey F. van Dijk J. Vistad OI. Wilkinson ME. and Wittmer H. 2017. The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective. Science of the Total Environment. 579: 1215-1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.106
  32. Nicholls RJ. and Branson J. 1998. Coastal Resilience and Planning for an Uncertain Future: An Introduction. The Geographical Journal. 164(3): 255-258. https://doi.org/10.2307/3060614
  33. Nicholls RJ. Hanson S. Herweijer C. Patmore N. Hallegatte S. Corfee-Morlot J. Chateau J. and Muir-Wood R. 2007. Ranking of the World's Cities Most Exposed to Coastal Flooding Today and in the Future. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
  34. Peacock WG. and Husein R. 2011. The Adoption and Implementation of Hazard Mitigation Policies and Strategies by Coastal Jurisdictions in Texas: The Planning Survey Results. Texas: Hazard Reduction and Recovery Center, College of Architecture, Texas A&M University.
  35. Piegay H. Chabot A. and Lay YL. 2020. Some comments about resilience: From cyclicity to trajectory, a shift in living and nonliving system theory. Geomorphology. 367: 106527.
  36. Reguero BG. Beck MW. Bresch DN. Calil J. and Meliane I. 2018. Comparing the cost effectiveness of nature-based and coastal adaptation: A case study from the Gulf Coast of the United States. PLoS ONE. 13(4): e0192132.
  37. Renaud FG. Sudmeier-Rieux K. and Estrella M. 2013. The role of ecosystems in disaster risk reduction. ToKyo.NewYork.Paris: United Nations University Press.
  38. Ruckelshaus MH. Guannel G. Arkema K. Verutes G. Griffin R. Guerry A. Silver J. Faries J. Brenner J. and Rosenthal A. 2016. Evaluating the Benefits of Green Infrastructure for Coastal Areas: Location, Location, Location. Coastal Management. 44(5): 504-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/08920753.2016.1208882
  39. Silva R. Lithgow D. Esteves LS. Martinez, ML. Moreno-Casasola P. Martell R. Pereira P. Mendoza E. Campos-Cascaredo A. Grez PW. Osorio AF. Osorio-Can JD. and Rivillas GD. 2017. Coastal risk mitigation by green infrastructure in Latin America. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Maritime Engineering. 170(2): 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmaen.2016.13
  40. Sohn W. Bae J. and Newman G. 2021. Green infrastructure for coastal flood protection: The longitudinal impacts of green infrastructure patterns on flood damage. Applied Geography. 135: 102565.
  41. Tanaka N. Sasaki Y. Mowjood MIM. Jinadasa KBSN. and Homchuen S. 2007. Coastal vegetation structures and their functions in tsunami protection: experience of the recent Indian Ocean tsunami. Landscape and ecological engineering. 3: 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-006-0013-9
  42. van Eck, NJ. and Waltman L. 2017. Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer. Scientometrics. 111(2): 1053-1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
  43. Walker B. Holling CS. Carpenter SR. and Kinzig A. 2004. Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social-ecological Systems. Ecology and Society. 9(2): 5.
  44. Wallin JA. 2005. Bibliometric Methods: Pitfalls and Possibilities. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology. 97(5): 261-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x
  45. Waltman L. and van Eck NJ. 2013. A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection. The European physical journal B. 86: 471.
  46. Wang ZY. Cho JY. and Hong YK. 2021. A Comparative Study of Research Trends in Residential Design for the Elderly in Domestic and International Research Using Co-occurrence Analysis - Focusing on Web of Science Core Collection & the KCI-Korean Journal Database -. Journal of the Korean Housing Association. 32(6): 47-57. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2021.32.6.047
  47. Waryszak P. Gavoille A. Whitt AA. Kelvin J. and Macreadie PI. 2021. Combining gray and green infrastructure to improve coastal resilience: lessons learnt from hybrid flood defenses. Coastal Engineering Journal. 63(3): 335-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/21664250.2021.1920278
  48. Xie L. Chen Z. Wang H. Zheng C. and Jiang J. 2020. Bibliometric and Visualized Analysis of Scientific Publications on Atlantoaxial Spine Surgery Based on Web of Science and VOSviewer. World Neurosurgery. 137: 435-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.171