과제정보
이 논문은 서울대 환경계획연구소의 지원을 받았습니다.
참고문헌
- 강영은, 최동욱, 홍성희, 정윤희, 김상범, 임승빈(2009) 원형경관(原型景觀)의 개념 정립 및 형성요인 연구. 농촌 계획, 15(4): 33-42.
- 김도은, 손용훈(2021) 헤메로비 등급(hemeroby index)을 활용한 도시공원의 인지된 자연성 평가. 한국조경학회지 49(2): 89-100. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2021.49.2.089
- 김수동(2012) 노자와 루소의 자연개념 분석. 교육철학연구 34(2): 23-48. https://doi.org/10.15754/JKPE.2012.34.2.002002
- 김승현, 조경진(2015) 도시 물순환 회복을 위한 그린인프라 계획 및 설계에 관한 연구: 조경계획 및 설계 해외사례 분석을 중심으로. 한국도시설계학회지 도시설계 16(3): 37-51.
- 김은성, 리상섭(2019) 국내 프랜차이즈 사업에서의 인적자원개발에 관한 체계적 문헌 고찰. 한국프랜차이즈경영연구 10: 33-47. https://doi.org/10.21871/KJFM.2019.6.10.2.33
- 김하수(1996) 전문 용어가 가지는 언어적 문제. 한국의학교육 8(1): 17-20.
- 김호정, 김가람(2017) 체계적 문헌 고찰을 통한 한국어 교육과정 연구 동향 분석. 한국언어문화학 14(1): 75-110. https://doi.org/10.15652/ink.2017.14.1.075
- 나정화(2000) Hemeroby 등급을 적용한 수목원조성 전후의 자연성평가 -대곡수목원을 대상으로-. 한국조경학회지 28(1): 62-69.
- 단국대학교 동양학 연구소(1999) 「한한대사전」. 서울: 단국대학교 출판부.
- 이민우(2008) 국어 동사 "지다"의 다의적 의미관계 분석. 한국어 의미학 27(0): 127-150.
- 이석환, 황기원(1997) 장소와 장소성의 다의적 개념에 관한 연구. 대한국토도시계획학회지(국토계획) 32(5): 169-184.
- 이영경(2004) 자연경관의 특질 분석: 자연성에 대한 조경 전문가와 일반인의 평가를 중심으로. 한국조경학회지 31(6): 1-14.
- 이우성(2011) 산림녹지의 계획 및 관리를 위한 자연생태적 기능 평가. 한국조경학회지 39(5): 1-11. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2011.39.5.001
- 이유미, 손연아(2016) 동아시아, 서양의 자연의 의미와 자연관 비교 분석. 한국과학교육학회지 36(3): 485-498. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2016.36.3.0485
- 이정호(1994) 영시와 한국시에서의 자연. 영학논집 (English Studies) 18.
- 임정철, 류태복, 안경환, 최병기(2016) 한국 마을숲 생태계 취약요소 발굴 및 취약성 평가. 한국전통조경학회지 34(4): 57-65. https://doi.org/10.14700/KITLA.2016.34.4.057
- 임지룡(2009) 다의어의 판정과 의미 확장의 분류 기준. 한국어 의미학 28(0): 193-226.
- 정나라, 안득수(2007) 정신병원 치료정원을 위한 수경시설의 시각적 선호도 분석. 한국조경학회지 35(3): 50-61.
- 정승규, 박종화, 우동걸, 이동근, 서창완, 김호걸(2015) 서식지 적합성 평가를 이용한 수변지역 핵심 보전지역 선정-수달을 대상으로. 환경복원녹화 18(2): 19-32. https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2015.18.2.19
- 조경진, 김용국, 김영현(2014) 도시 오픈스페이스 방문동기 및 만족도 연구 -서울시 하천변 오픈스페이스를 중심으로-. 한국조경학회지 42(1): 27-40. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.1.027
- 조용현(1997) 우리 나라 중소하천 코리도의 자연성 평가기법 연구. 한국조경학회지 25(2): 2073-2081.
- 홍종선(2002) 파생접사의 생산성. 영어교육연구 (24): 145-158
- 황기원(1989) 경관의 다의성에 (多義性) 관한 고찰. 한국조경학회지 17(1): 1055-1068.
- Anderson, J. E.(1991) A conceptual framework for evaluating and quantifying naturalness. Conservation Biology 5(3): 347-352. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.1991.tb00148.x
- Angelstam, P. and G. Mikusinski(1994) Woodpecker assemblages in natural and managed boreal and hemiboreal forest-A review. In Annales Zoologici Fennici (pp. 157-172). Finnish Zoological Publishing Board, formed by the Finnish Academy of Sciences, Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo, Societas pro Fauna et Flora Fennica, and Societas Scientiarum Fennica.
- Angermeier, P. L.(2000) The natural imperative for biological conservation. Conservation Biology 14(2): 373-381. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.98362.x
- Asakawa, S., K. Yoshida and K. Yabe(2004) Perceptions of urban stream corridors within the greenway system of Sapporo, Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning 68(2-3): 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00158-0
- Beier, P., W. Spencer, R. F. Baldwin and B. H. McRAE(2011) Toward best practices for developing regional connectivity maps. Conservation Biology 25(5): 879-892. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01716.x
- Browning, W. D., O. R. Catherine and O. C. Joseph(2014) 14 Patterns of Biophilic Design: Improving Health & Well-Being in the Built Environment. Philadelphia, PA: Terrapin Bright Green, 9.
- Coeterier, J. F.(1996) Dominant attributes in the perception and evaluation of the Dutch landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 34(1): 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(95)00204-9
- Frank, S., C. Furst, L. Koschke, A. Witt and F. Makeschin(2013) Assessment of landscape aesthetics-Validation of a landscape metrics-based assessment by visual estimation of the scenic beauty. Ecological Indicators 32: 222-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.03.026
- Frondoni, R., B. Mollo and G. Capotorti(2011) A landscape analysis of land cover change in the Municipality of Rome (Italy): Spatio-temporal characteristics and ecological implications of land cover transitions from 1954 to 2001. Landscape and Urban Planning 100(1-2): 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.12.002
- Gobster, P. H. and L. M. Westphal(2004) The human dimensions of urban greenways: Planning for recreation and related experiences. Landscape and Urban Planning 68(2-3): 147-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00162-2
- Hagerhall, C. M., T. Purcell and R. Taylor(2004) Fractal dimension of landscape silhouette outlines as a predictor of landscape preference. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24(2): 247-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.004
- Hobbs, R. J., D. N. Cole, L. Yung, E. S. Zavaleta, G. H. Aplet, F. S. Chapin III, P. B. Landres, D. J. Parson, N. L. Stephenson, P. S. White, D. M. Graber, E. S. Higgs, C. I. Millar, J. M. Randall, K. A. Tonnessen and S. Woodley(2010) Guiding concepts for park and wilderness stewardship in an era of global environmental change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8(9): 483-490. https://doi.org/10.1890/090089
- Hur, M., J. L. Nasar and B. Chun(2010) Neighborhood satisfaction, physical and perceived naturalness and openness. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(1): 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.05.005
- Jorgensen, A., J. Hitchmough and T. Calvert(2002) Woodland spaces and edges: Their impact on perception of safety and preference. Landscape and Urban Planning 60(3): 135-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00052-X
- Junker, B. and M. Buchecker(2008) Aesthetic preferences versus ecological objectives in river restorations. Landscape and Urban Planning 85(3-4): 141-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.11.002
- Junninen, K., M. Simila, J. Kouki and H. Kotiranta(2006) Assemblages of wood-inhabiting fungi along the gradients of succession and naturalness in boreal pine-dominated forests in Fennoscandia. Ecography 29(1): 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2005.0906-7590.04358.x
- Kuuluvainen, T. and T. Aakala(2011) Natural forest dynamics in boreal Fennoscandia: A review and classification. Silva Fennica 45(5): 823-841. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.73
- Lausch, A., T. Blaschke, D. Haase, F. Herzog, R. U. Syrbe, L. Tischendorf and U. Walz(2015) Understanding and quantifying landscape structure-A review on relevant process characteristics, data models and landscape metrics. Ecological Modelling 295: 31-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2014.08.018
- Lynn, N. A. and R. D. Brown(2003) Effects of recreational use impacts on hiking experiences in natural areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 64(1-2): 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00202-5
- Nasar, J. L.(1994) Urban design aesthetics: The evaluative qualities of building exteriors. Environment and Behavior 26(3): 377-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659402600305
- Neumann, M. and F. Starlinger(2001) The significance of different indices for stand structure and diversity in forests. Forest Ecology and Management 145(1-2): 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00577-6
- Ode, A., G. Fry, M. S. Tveit, P. Messager and D. Miller(2009) Indicators of perceived naturalness as drivers of landscape preference. Journal of Environmental Management 90(1): 375-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.10.013
- Oheimb, G. V., C. Westphal, H. Tempel and W. Hardtle(2005) Structural pattern of a near-natural beech forest (Fagus sylvatica) (Serrahn, North-east Germany). Forest Ecology and Management 212(1-3): 253-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.033
- Paetzold, A., P. H. Warren and L. L. Maltby(2010) A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity 7(3): 273-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.11.003
- Purcell, A. T., and R. J. Lamb(1998) Preference and naturalness: An ecological approach. Landscape and Urban Planning 42(1): 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00073-5
- Purcell, A. T., R. J. Lamb, E. M. Peron and S. Falchero(1994) Preference or preferences for landscape?. Journal of Environmental Psychology 14(3): 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(94)80056-1
- Roberge, J. M., P. Angelstam and M. A. Villard(2008) Specialised woodpeckers and naturalness in hemiboreal forests-Deriving quantitative targets for conservation planning. Biological Conservation 141(4): 997-1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.01.010
- Sabatini, F. M., S. Burrascano, W. S. Keeton, C. Levers, M. Lindner, F. Potzschner P. J. Verkerk, J. Bauhus, E. Buchwald, O. Chaskovsky, N. Debaive, F. Horvath, M. Garbarino, N. Grigoriadis, F. Lombardi, I. M. Duarte, P. Meyer, R. Midteng, S. Mikac, M. Mikolas, R. Motta, G. Mozgeris, L. Nunes, M. Panayotov, P. Odor, A. Ruete, B. Simovski, J. Stillhard, M. Svoboda, J. Szwagrzyk, O. Tikkanen, R. Volosyanchuk, T. Vrska, T. Zlatanov and T. Kuemmerle(2018) Where are Europe's last primary forests? Diversity and Distributions 24(10): 1426-1439. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12778
- Sang, A. O., I. Knez, B. Gunnarsson and M. Hedblom(2016) The effects of naturalness, gender, and age on how urban green space is perceived and used. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 18: 268-276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2016.06.008
- Sprugel, D. G.(1991) Disturbance, equilibrium, and environmental variability: What is 'natural' vegetation in a changing environment? Biological Conservation 58(1): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(91)90041-7
- Stoddard, J. L., D. P. Larsen, C. P. Hawkins, R. K. Johnson and R. H. Norris(2006) Setting expectations for the ecological condition of streams: The concept of reference condition. Ecological Applications 16(4): 1267-1276. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1267:seftec]2.0.co;2
- Taylor, A. F., F. E. Kuo and W. C. Sullivan(2002) Views of nature and self-discipline: Evidence from inner city children. Journal of Environmental Psychology 22(1-2): 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0241
- Torok, P., E. Vida, B. Deak, S. Lengyel and B. Tothmeresz(2011) Grassland restoration on former croplands in Europe: An assessment of applicability of techniques and costs. Biodiversity and Conservation 20(11): 2311-2332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-011-9992-4
- Tveit, M., A. Ode and G. Fry(2006) Key concepts in a framework for analysing visual landscape character. Landscape Research 31(3): 229-255. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426390600783269
- Van den Berg, A. E., A. Jorgensen and E. R. Wilson(2014) Evaluating restoration in urban green spaces: Does setting type make a difference? Landscape and Urban Planning 127: 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.04.012
- Van den Born, R. J., R. H. Lenders, W. T. De Groot and E. Huijsman(2001) The new biophilia: An exploration of visions of nature in Western countries. Environmental Conservationn 28(1): 65-75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892901000066
- Wells, N. M.(2000) At home with nature: Effects of "greenness" on children's cognitive functioning. Environment and Behavior 32(6): 775-795. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972793
- Winter, S. and G. C. Moller(2008) Microhabitats in lowland beech forests as monitoring tool for nature conservation. Forest Ecology and Management 255(3-4): 1251-1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.029
- Wrbka, T., K. H. Erb, N. B. Schulz, J. Peterseil, C. Hahn and H. Haberl(2004) Linking pattern and process in cultural landscapes. An empirical study based on spatially explicit indicators. Land Use Policy 21(3): 289-306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.012