Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회논문집)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Korean Region Ground Motion Prediction Equation Considering Site Effects

부지특성 반영한 한반도 지반운동 예측식

  • Jee, Hyun Woo (Dept. of Architecture Engineering, Hanyang University) ;
  • Han, Sang Whan (Dept. of Architecture Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • 지현우 (한양대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 한상환 (한양대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2022.10.07
  • Accepted : 2023.01.25
  • Published : 2023.02.28
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Ground motion prediction equations (GMPEs) have been widely used in various earthquake engineering studies such as probabilistic seismic hazard analyses, scenario-based earthquake hazard map, ground motion, and uniform hazard response spectrum. This equation contains parameters of seismic source path, and site effects. However, previous studies only developed GMPEs without considering site effects. The purpose of this study is to develop a GMPE model considering site effects. Site condition was classified with Vs30 data for seismic stations, where Vs30 was the average shear wave velocity over a depth of 30 m from the ground surface. This study validated the proposed GMPE model using event residuals between calculated and recorded ground motion recording data for Korean earthquakes.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 교육부와 한국연구재단 3단계 산학연협력 선도대학 육성사업(LINC 3.0)의 지원으로 진행된 것입니다.

References

  1. Abrahamson, N. A., & Youngs, R. R. (1992). A stable algorithm for regression analyses using the random effects model, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 82(1), 505-510. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0820010505
  2. Akkar, S., Sandikkaya, M. A., & Bommer, J. J. (2014). Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East, Bulletin Of Earthquake Engineering, 12, 359-387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9461-4
  3. Ameri, G., Oth, A., Pilz, M., Bindi, D., Parolai, S., Luzi, L., Mucciarelli, M., & Cultrera, G. (2011). Separation of source and site effects by generalized inversion technique using the aftershock recordings of the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 9, 717-739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9248-4
  4. Atkinson, G. M., & Mereu, R. F. (1992). The Shape of Ground Motion Attenuation Curves in Southeastern Canada, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 82(5), 2014-2031. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0820052014
  5. Baker, J. W. (2015). Introduction to probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. White Paper Version 2.1.
  6. Boore, D. M. (2003). Prediction of Ground Motion Using the Stochastic Method. Pure and Applied Geophysics. 160, 635-676. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00012553
  7. Boore, D. M., Joyner, W. B., & Fumal, T. E. (1997). Equations for Estimating Horizontal Response Spectra and Peak Acceleration from Western North American Earthquakes, A Summary of Recent Work. Seismological Research Letters, 68(1), 128-153. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.1.128
  8. Calais, E., Camelbeeck, T., Stein, S., Liu, M., & Craig, T. J. (2016). A new paradigm for large earthquakes in stable continental plate interiors, Geophysical Research Letters, 43(20), 10,621-10,637.
  9. Campbell, K. W., & Bozorgnia, Y. (2014). NGA-West2 Ground Motion Model for the Average Horizontal Components of PGA, PGV, and 5% Damped Linear Acceleration Response Spectra, Earthquake Spectra, 30(3), 1087-1115. https://doi.org/10.1193/062913EQS175M
  10. Chiou, B. S. J., & Youngs, R. R. (2014). Update of the Chiou and Youngs NGA Model for the Average Horizontal Component of Peak Ground Motion and Response Spectra, Earthquake Spectra, 30(3), 1117-1153. https://doi.org/10.1193/072813EQS219M
  11. Cornell, C. A. (1968). ENGINEERING SEISMIC RISK ANALYSIS, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 58(5), 1583-1606. https://doi.org/10.1785/BSSA0580051583
  12. Emolo, A., Sharma, N., Festa, G., Zollo, A., Convertito, V., Park, J. H., Chi, H. C., & Lim, I. S. (2015). Ground-motion prediction equations for South Korea Peninsula ground-motion prediction equations for South Korea Peninsula, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 105(5), 2625-2640. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140296
  13. Ha, S.J. & Han, S.W. (2016) A Method for Selecting Ground Motions that Considers Target Response Spectrum Mean and Variance as Well as Correlation Structure, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 20(8), 1263-1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1138162
  14. Jee, H. W., & Han, S. W. (2020). Construction of a Site- and Period-Specific Seismic Hazard Map for the Korean Peninsula, Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, 20(2), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2020.20.2.207
  15. Jee, H. W., & Han, S. W. (2022). Regional Ground Motion Prediction Equation Developed for the Korean Peninsula Using Recorded and Simulated Ground Motions, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 26(10), 5384-5406. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2021.1871682
  16. Jeong, K. H., & Lee, H. S. (2018). Ground-motion prediction equation for South Korea based on recent earthquake records, Earthquakes and Structures, 15(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.12989/EAS.2018.15.1.029
  17. Jo, N., & Baag, C. (2003). Estimation of spectrum decay parameter k and stochastic prediction of strong ground motions in southeastern Korea, Journal of the Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea, 7(6), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.5000/EESK.2003.7.6.059
  18. Johnston, A. C. (1996). Seismic moment assessment of earthquakes in stable continental regions-I. Instrumental seismicity, Geophysical Journal International, 124(2), 381-414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1996.tb07028.x
  19. Junn, J., Jo, N., & Baag, C. (2002). Stochastic prediction of ground motions in southern Korea, Geosciences Journal, 6(3), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02912691
  20. Kim, K., Seo, W., Han, J., Kwon, J., Kang, S. Y., Ree, J., Kim, S., & Liu K. (2020). The 2017 ML 5.4 Pohang earthquake sequence, Korea, recorded by a dense seismic network, Tectonophysics, 774, 228306.
  21. Kim, M., & Kyung, J. (2015). An Analysis of the Sensitivity of Input Parameters for the Seismic Hazard Analysis in the Korean Peninsula, Journal of the Korean Earth Science Society, 37(1), 52-61. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2016.37.1.52
  22. Korea Meteorological Administration [KMA]. (2015). A basic study on building ShakeMap database of scenario earthquakes in the Korean Peninsula, Korea Meteorological Administration, 2015;202 pp.
  23. Lee, J., Park, D., & Baag, C. (2000). Stochastic prediction of strong ground motions and attenuation equations in the southeastern Korean Peninsula, Proceedings of EESK Conference, Seoul, 70-77.
  24. Moon, K.-H., Han, S.W., & Lee, T.S. (2012) Approximate MPA-based method for performing incremental dynamic analysis, Nonlinear Dynamics, 2012, 67(4), 2865-2888 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-011-0195-z
  25. Nakamura, Y. (1989). A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface, Quarterly Report of Railway Technical Research Institute, 30(1), 25-33.
  26. Park, D., Lee, J., Baag, C., & Kim, J. (2001). Stochastic prediction of strong ground motions and attenuation equations in the southeastern Korean peninsula, Journal of the Geological Society of Korea, 37(1), 21-30.
  27. Park, H., Lee, H., & Kim, B. (2021). Correction factors for GMMs considering site and topographic effects in South Korea, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.
  28. Seyhan, E., & Stewart, J. P. (2014). Semi-Empirical Nonlinear Site Amplification from NGA-West2 Data and Simulations, Earthquake Spectra, 30(3), 1241-1256. https://doi.org/10.1193/063013EQS181M
  29. Vanneste, K., Stein, S., Thierry, C., & Vleminckx, B. (2018). Insights into earthquake hazard map performance from shaking history simulations, Scientific Reports, 8, 1855.
  30. Walling, M., Silva, W., & Abrahamson, N. (2008). Nonlinear Site Amplification Factors for Constraining the NGA Models, Earthquake Spectra, 24(1), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2934350
  31. Wen, Y.K., Collins, K.R., Han, S.W., & Elwood, K.J. (2006). Dual-level designs of buildings under seismic loads, Structural Safety, 18, 195-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-4730(96)00011-2
  32. Woo, J., Rhie, J., Kim, S., Kang, T., Kim, K., & Kim, Y. (2019). The 2016 Gyeongju earthquake sequence revisited, aftershock interactions within a complex fault system, Geophysical Journal International, 217, 58-74. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggz009
  33. Worden, C. B., Wald, D. J., Sanborn, J., & Thompson, E. M. (2015). Development of an open-source hybrid global Vs30 model, Seismological Society of America Annual Meeting, Pasadena, CA, USA.
  34. Zafarani, H., & Soghrat, M. R. (2017). Single-Station Sigma for the Iranian Strong Motion Stations, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 174, 4077-4099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-017-1613-z
  35. Zandieh, A., & Pezeshk, S. (2010). Investigation of Geometrical Spreading and Quality Factor Functions in the New Madrid Seismic Zone, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 100, 2185-2195.  https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090209