DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on the Application of Damping Ratio in the Seismic Performance Evaluation of Concrete Dams

콘크리트 댐 내진성능평가 시 감쇠비 적용 방안 고찰

  • 오정근 (국토안전관리원 댐항만실) ;
  • 정영석 (텍사스 주립대학교 알링턴 캠퍼스) ;
  • 권민호 (경상국립대학교 토목공학과)
  • Received : 2022.09.20
  • Accepted : 2023.01.19
  • Published : 2023.02.28

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to review the appropriateness of the application method for the value of the damping ratio suggested in the current design standards and evaluation guidelines when evaluating the seismic performance of concrete dams and to suggest improvements. As a result of the study, for the magnitude of the damping ratio in the dynamic elastic analysis, it is necessary to refer to the case of a similar dam in which the magnitude of the earthquake load is similar and the reproducibility of the damping ratio has been verified. Considering this, it is necessary to apply a low damping ratio and consider adding hysteresis damping in case of nonlinear behavior. In addition, since the concrete dam body located on the rock has insignificant radiation attenuation effect, it is not reasonable to increase the damping ratio of the concrete dam body to reflect the radiation damping. Therefore, in order to evaluate the realistic seismic performance of concrete dams, it is necessary to revise the damping ratio-related contents contained in the current dam design standards and evaluation guidelines.

이 논문의 목적은 콘크리트 댐의 내진성능평가 시 현행 설계기준과 평가요령에서 제시하는 감쇠비 값 크기에 대한 적용방안의 적정성을 검토하고 개선안을 제시하는 것이다. 연구결과 동적탄성해석 시 감쇠비의 크기는 지진하중의 크기가 유사하고 감쇠비에 대한 재현성이 검증된 유사댐의 사례를 참조할 필요가 있으며, 동적소성해석 시에는 지진하중의 크기와 상관없이 초기 탄성거동을 고려하여 감쇠비를 낮은값으로 적용하고 비선형 거동 시 이력감쇠가 추가되도록 고려할 필요가 있다. 또한 암반상에 위치한 콘크리트 댐체는 방사감쇠 효과가 미미하므로 방사감쇠를 반영하기 위해 콘크리트 댐체의 감쇠비를 증가시키는 것은 합리적이지 않다. 따라서 콘크리트 댐의 현실적인 내진성능평가를 위해 현행 댐 설계기준과 평가요령에 수록된 감쇠비 관련내용에 대해 개정이 필요하다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 성과는 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(No. NRF-2019R1A2C1003007).

References

  1. Ministry of Land. (2019), Infrastructure and Transport, Dam seismic design KDS 54 17: 2019 (in Korean).
  2. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea Infrastructure Safety & Technology Corporation. (2019), Seismic performance evaluation and improvement tips for existing facilities (Dam) (in Korean).
  3. U.S. Army Corps. (2007), EM 1110-2-6053.
  4. Lee, J. H. (2005), Earthquake Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dams Considering Inelastic Damage of Dam-foundation Boundary, Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, 20(3), 174-179 (in Korean).
  5. ABAQUS, Dassault System Simulia Corp. (2011), Abaqus Analysis User's Manual. Version 6.10.
  6. FEMA. (2005), Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety: Earthquake Analyses and Design of Dams.
  7. Korea Water Resources Corporation. (2014), A Study on the Advanced Seismic Evaluation of Existing Dams(III), Report no. 2015-WR-RR-7-16. (in Korean).
  8. Report of the evaluation review committee on the seismic performance of the civil society dam, Japan.
  9. Kim, D. K. (2013), Structural dynamics, Gumi Library. (in Korean).
  10. ProShake, EduPro Civil Systems Inc. (2019), ProShake Ground Response Analysis Program Version 2.0 User's Manual.