Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제24권2호
  • /
  • Pages.81-90
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study of using the loss rate of bolt pretension as a damage predictor for steel connections

  • Chui-Hsin Chen (Department of Civil Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University) ;
  • Chi-Ming Lai (Department of Civil Engineering, National Cheng Kung University) ;
  • Ker-Chun Lin (National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, National Applied Research Laboratories) ;
  • Sheng-Jhih Jhuang (National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering, National Applied Research Laboratories) ;
  • Heui-Yung Chang (Department of Civil Engineering, National Chung Hsing University)
  • 투고 : 2021.04.21
  • 심사 : 2022.01.24
  • 발행 : 2023.02.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The maximum drifts are important to the seismic evaluation of steel buildings and connections, but the information can hardly be obtained from the post-earthquake field investigation. This research studies the feasibility of using the loss rate of bolt pretension as an earthquake damage predictor. Full-scale tests were made on four steel connections using bolted-web-welded-flange details. One connection was unreinforced (UN), another was reinforced with double shear plates (DS), and the other two used reduced beam sections (RBS). The preinstalled strain gauges were used to control the pretensions and monitor the losses of the high-strength bolts. The results showed that the loss rate of bolt pretension was highly related to the damage of the connections. The pretensions lost up to 10% in all the connections at the yield drifts of 0.5% to 1%. After yielding of the connections, the pretensions lost significantly until fracture occurred. The UN and DS connections failed with a maximum drift of 4 %, and the two RBS connections showed better ductility and failed with a maximum drift of 6%. Under the far-field-type loading protocol, the loss rate grew to 60%. On the contrary, the rate for the specimen under near-fault-type loading protocol was about 40%. The loss rate of bolt pretension is therefore recommended to use as an earthquake damage predictor. Additionally, the 10% and 40% loss rates are recommended to predict the limit states of connection yielding and maximum strength, respectively, and to define the performance levels of serviceability and life-safety for the buildings.

키워드

과제정보

The authors highly appreciate the comments and suggestion made by Professor Cheng-Chih Chen of National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University. Completion of the work was made possible through financial support under Grant 109-2221-E-005-081-MY3 from the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) in Taiwan, which is gratefully acknowledged.

참고문헌

  1. Abdalla, K.M., Ghazi, A.F. and Samer, B. (2007), "Experimental investigation of force-distribution in high-strength bolts in extended end-plate connections", Steel Compos. Struct., 7(2), 87-103. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2007.7.2.087.
  2. AIJ (2012), Recommendation for Design of Connections in Steel Structures, Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ), Tokyo, Japan.
  3. AISC (2005), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Building, American Institute of Steel Construction, Illinois, Chicago, USA.
  4. AISC (2010), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Building, American Institute of Steel Construction, Illinois, Chicago, USA.
  5. AISC (2016), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Building, American Institute of Steel Construction, Illinois, Chicago, USA.
  6. Amiri, F.S., Amiri, G.G. and Razeghi, H. (2013), "Estimation of seismic demands of steel frames subjected to near-fault earthquakes having forward directivity and comparing with pushover analysis results", Struct. Des. Tall Special Build., 22(13), 975-988. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.747.
  7. Andrews, B.M., Fahnestock, L.A. and Song, J.H. (2008), "Performance-based engineering framework and ductility capacity models for buckling-restrained braces", NSEL Report No. NSEL-012; Newmark Structural Engineering Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL, USA.
  8. ATC-63 (2008), Recommended Methodology for Quantification of Building Seismic Performance and Response Parameters, Project Report, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, USA.
  9. Chang, H.Y., Liao, C.T., Yeh, C.Y. and Lai, C.M. (2018), "Seismic upgrading of steel moment connections using double-shear-tab details", Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Advances in Steel Structures (ICASS'2018), Hong Kong, China, December.
  10. Chang, H.Y. and Yeh, C.Y. (2019), "A study on behavior of steel joints that combine high-strength bolts and fillet welds", Steel Compos. Struct., 31(4), 361-372. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.31.4.361.
  11. Chen, S.J., Yeh, C.H. and Chu, J.M. (1996), "Ductile steel beam-to-column connections for seismic resistance", J. Struct. Eng., 122(11), 1292-1299. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:11(1292).
  12. Chi, B. and Uang, C.M. (2002), "Cyclic response and design recommendations of reduced beam section moment connections with deep columns", J. Struct. Eng., 128(4), 464-473. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(464).
  13. Chou, C.C., Tsai, K.C., Wang, Y.Y. and Jao, C.K. (2010), "Seismic rehabilitation performance of steel side plate moment connections", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(1), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.931.
  14. Chung, Y.L., Nagae, T., Matsumiya, T. and Nakashima, M. (2011), "Seismic resistance capacity of beam-column connections in high-rise buildings: E-Defense shaking table test", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 40(6), 605-622. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1037.
  15. Chung, Y.L., Nagae, T., Matsumiya, T. and Nakashima, M. (2012), "Seismic capacity of retrofitted beam-column connections in high-rise steel frames when subjected to long-period ground motions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 41(10), 735-753. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.1154.
  16. DesRoches, R., Taftali, B. and Ellingwood, B.R. (2010). "Seismic performance assessment of steel frames with shape memory alloy connections Part I - Analysis and seismic demands", J. Earthq. Eng., 14(4), 471-486. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460903301088.
  17. FEMA 351(2000), Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment Frame Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  18. Ellingwood, B.R., Taftali, B. and DesRoches, R. (2010), "Seismic performance assessment of steel frames with shape memory alloy connections Part II - Probabilistic seismic demand assessment", J. Earthq. Eng., 14(5), 631-645. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460903247935.
  19. Engelhardt, M.D., Sabol, T.A., Aboutaha, R.S. and Frank, K.H. (1996), "Development of interim recommendations for improved welded moment connections in response to the Northridge earthquake", Connections in Steel Structures III, Oxford: Elsevier, Trento, Italy.
  20. Grant, D.N. (2014), "Assessment of existing structures using response history analysis", Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
  21. Hussam, M., Lopez, R.S. and Guillermo, R. (2016), "Causes of pretension loss in high-strength bolts", Technical report MS 39180-6199; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C., USA.
  22. Krawinkler, H., Gupta, A., Medina, R. and Luco, N. (2000), "Development of loading histories for testing of steel beam-to-column assemblies", SAC Background Report SAC/BD-00/10; Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
  23. Kuwamura, H. (1998), "Fracture of steel during an earthquake-state-of-the-art in Japan", Eng. Struct., 20, 310-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00030-8.
  24. Mahin, S.A. (1998), "Lessons from damage to steel buildings during the Northridge earthquake", Eng. Struct., 20, 261-270. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00032-1.
  25. Nakashima, M., Roeder, C.W. and Maruoka, Y. (2000), "Steel moment frames for earthquakes in United States and Japan", J. Struct. Eng., 126(8), 861-868. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:8(861).
  26. Plumier, A. (1990), "New idea for safe structures in seismic zones", IABSE Symposium, Mixed Structures Including New Materials, Brussels.
  27. Prinz, G.S., Nussbaumer, A., Borges, L. and Khadka, S. (2014), "Experimental testing and simulation of bolted beam-column connections having thick extended endplates and multiple bolts per row", Eng. Struct., 59, 434-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.10.042.
  28. Roeder, C.W. (2002), "Connection performance for seismic design of steel moment frames", J. Struct. Eng., 128(4), 517-525. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(517).
  29. Somerville, P.G. (1997), "Development of ground motion time histories for phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC steel project", The Report SAC/DB-97/04 SAC; Joint Venture, Richmond, CA, USA.
  30. Tabar, A.M. and Deylami, A. (2006), "Investigation of major parameters affecting instability of steel beams with RBS moment connections", Steel Compos. Struct., 6(3), 203-219. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2006.6.3.203.
  31. Tremblay, R., Timler, P., Bruneau, M. and Filiatrault, A. (1995), "Performance of steel structures during the 1994 Northridge earthquake", Canadian J. Civil Eng., 22(2), 338-360. https://doi.org/10.1139/l95-046.
  32. Tremblay, R., Bruneau, M., Nakashima, M., Prion, H.G.L., Filiatrault, A. and DeVall, R. (1996), "Seismic design of steel buildings: Lessons from the 1995 Hyogo-Ken Nanbu earthquake", Canadian J. of Civil Eng., 23(3), 727-756. https://doi.org/10.1139/l96-885.
  33. Vatansever, C. and Kutsal, K. (2018), "Effect of bolted splice within the plastic hinge zone on beam-to-column connection behavior", Steel Compos. Struct., 28(6), 767-778. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.28.6.76.
  34. Yun, S.Y., Hamburger, R.O., Cornell, C.A. and Foutch, D.A. (2002), "Seismic performance evaluation for steel moment frames", J. Struct. Eng., 128(4), 534-545. http://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2002)128:4(534).