DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Technology Gap Prediction and Technology Catchup Strategy for High-Speed Rail Vehicles

고속철도차량의 기술격차 예측과 기술추격 전략

  • Kim, Hyung Jin (Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Kim, Si Gon (Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • 김형진 (서울과학기술대학교 철도전문대학원 철도경영정책학과) ;
  • 김시곤 (서울과학기술대학교 철도전문대학원 철도경영정책학과)
  • Received : 2022.10.16
  • Accepted : 2022.10.25
  • Published : 2023.02.01

Abstract

This study started with questioning the fact that in the assessmentof technology, which has taken place every two years since 2010, the technology gap in the most technologically advanced countries was evaluated as 4-5 years in each evaluation. To interrogate this question, regression estimation was performed using the Gompertz model based on time series data for technology level evaluation. As a result, it would take 17 years for high-speed rail vehicle technology to reach the level of 95 % of the country with the highest technology, and 72 years to reach the level of 100 %. Recognizing the technology gap is important in establishing a technology catchup strategy. A collaborative technology catchup strategy is the best strategy for moving to an original technology development stage while competing with large global leaders without much domestic market demand. This can occur regardless of where Korea is located in the technology catchup stage.

본 연구는 2010년부터 격년 단위로 수행되는 기술수준 평가에서, 매 평가마다 최고 기술보유국과의 기술격차가 4-5년으로 평가되는 것에 의문을 가지고 시작하였다. 이러한 의문을 풀기 위해 기술수준 평가에 대한 시계열 자료를 토대로 Gompertz 모형을 가지고 회귀추정 하였다. 그 결과 고속철도차량 기술이 최고 기술 보유국의 95 % 수준에 도달하는 데는 17년이 필요하고, 100 %에 도달하는 데는 72년의 시간이 필요하다는 결과를 얻었다. 기술격차를 냉정히 인식하는 것은 기술추격 전략을 수립하는 데 결정적으로 중요하다. 한국이 기술추격 단계에서 어느 단계에 위치해 있든지 국내 시장 수요가 많지 않고 해외의 대형 선도기업과 경쟁하면서 원천기술개발단계로 이행하기 위해서는 협력을 통한 기술 전략이 최선이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Data Bridge (2022). Global bullet train/High speed rail market, Available at: https://www.databridgemarketresearch.com/reports/global-bullet-train-high-speed-rail-market (Accessed: October 11, 2022).
  2. Han, M. K., Kim, B. S., Ryu, J. Y. and Byeon, S. C. (2010). "Technology level evaluation based on technology growth model and implication -In case of 'biosensor technology'." Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 252-281 (in Korean).
  3. Hobday, M. (2000). "Innovation in complex products and system." Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 7-8, pp.793-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00105-0
  4. Huang, H., Xiong, J. and Zhang, J. (2021). "Windows of opportunity in the CoPS's catch-up process: A case study of China's high-speed train industry." Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042144
  5. Kim, B. S. (2010). A study on the dynamic method of estimating technology levels based on the technology growth model, Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP), Research Report 2010-23, pp. 1-232 (in Korean).
  6. Kim, K. J. (2013). "Technology management success story: R&D, a growth weapon after pioneering the global market." Technology & Management, Vol. 2013, No. 12, pp. 46-53 (in Korean).
  7. Korea Institute of S&T Evaluation and Planning (KISTEP) (2011). 2010 Technology level assessment report, Ministry of Education, Science & Technology, Comprehensive Adjustment 2011-031, pp. 1-564 (in Korean).
  8. Korea Railroad Research Institute (KRRI) (2015). 430km/h class high-speed train driving test research final report, Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement in Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, pp. 1-972 (in Korean).
  9. Korea Railroad Research Institute (KRRI) (2018). Detailed analysis of railway transportation technology level and establishment of R&D promotion strategy research final report, Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement in Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, pp. 1-225 (in Korean).
  10. Krasner, S. (1988). "Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective." Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 66-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414088021001004
  11. Lee, K. and Malerba, F. (2017). "Catch-Up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems." Research Policy, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 338-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.09.006
  12. Martino, J. P. (1993). Technological forecasting for decision making, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA.
  13. Mathews, J. A. (2005). "Strategy & the crystal cycle." California Management Reviews, Vol. 47, No. 2, pp. 6-32. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166293
  14. Namuwiki (2022a). EMU-320, Available at: https://namu.wiki/w/EMU-320 (Accessed: October 12, 2022).
  15. Namuwiki (2022b). KTX-EUM (in Korean), Available at: https://namu.wiki/w/KTX-이음 (Accessed: October 12, 2022).
  16. Nunno, R. (2018). Fact sheet: High speed rail development worldwide, Available at: https://www.eesi.org/papers/view/fact-sheet-high-speed-rail-development-worldwide (Accessed: October 12, 2022).
  17. Park, T. Y. and Ji, I. Y. (2020). "Evidence of latecomers' catch-up in CoPS industries: A systematic review." Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, Vol. 32, No. 8, pp. 968-983. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1732339
  18. Perez, C. and Soete, L. (1988). "Catching up in technology: Entry barriers and windows of opportunity." Technical Change and Economic Theory, Giovanni, D., Ricahrd, N., Gerald, S., Luc, S., Eds.; Pinter Publishers, London, UK, pp. 458-479.
  19. Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, USA.
  20. Solow, R. (1957). "Technical change and the aggregate production function." Reviews of Economic and Statistics, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 312-320. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926047
  21. Yoon, J. H. (2011). The evolutionary process of large complex system development: a case study on the high speed railway and urban transit maglev development, Ph.D. Dissertation, Korea University Graduate School, Seoul, Korea (in Korean).