The Korean Journal of Pain

The Korean Pain Society (대한통증학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Measurement of S1 foramen depth for ultrasound-guided S1 transforaminal epidural injection

  • Ye Sull, Kim (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University Medical School) ;
  • SeongOk, Park (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University Medical School) ;
  • Chanhong, Lee (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University Medical School) ;
  • Sang-Kyi, Lee (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University Medical School) ;
  • A Ram, Doo (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University Medical School) ;
  • Ji-Seon, Son (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonbuk National University Medical School)
  • Received : 2022.07.04
  • Accepted : 2022.09.25
  • Published : 2023.01.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Ultrasound-guided first sacral transforaminal epidural steroid injection (S1 TFESI) is a useful and easily applicable alternative to fluoroscopy or computed tomography (CT) in lumbosacral radiculopathy. When a needle approach is used, poor visualization of the needle tip reduces the accuracy of the procedure, increasing its difficulty. This study aimed to improve ultrasound-guided S1 TFESI by evaluating radiological S1 posterior foramen data obtained using three-dimensional CT (3D-CT). Methods: Axial 3D-CT images of the pelvis were retrospectively analyzed. The radiological measurements obtained from the images included 1st posterior sacral foramen depth (S1D, mm), 1st posterior sacral foramen width (S1W, mm), the angle of the 1st posterior sacral foramen (S1A, °), and 1st posterior sacral foramen distance (S1ds, mm). The relationship between the demographic factors and measured values were then analyzed. Results: A total of 632 patients (287 male and 345 female) were examined. The mean S1D values for males and females were 11.9 ± 1.9 mm and 10.6 ± 1.8 mm, respectively (P < 0.001); the mean S1A 28.2 ± 4.8° and 30.1 ± 4.9°, respectively (P < 0.001); and the mean S1ds, 24.1 ± 2.9 mm and 22.9 ± 2.6 mm, respectively (P < 0.001); however, the mean S1W values were not significantly different. Height was the only significant predictor of S1D (β = 0.318, P = 0.004). Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided S1 TFESI performance and safety may be improved with adjustment of needle insertion depth congruent with the patient's height.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper was supported by Funds from Biomedical Research Institute, Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Republic of Korea.

References

  1. Manchikanti L, Buenaventura RM, Manchikanti KN, Ruan X, Gupta S, Smith HS, et al. Effectiveness of therapeutic lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections in managing lumbar spinal pain. Pain Physician 2012; 15: E199-245. https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2012/15/E199
  2. Roberts ST, Willick SE, Rho ME, Rittenberg JD. Efficacy of lumbosacral transforaminal epidural steroid injections: a systematic review. PM R 2009; 1: 657-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.04.008
  3. Chun EH, Park HS. Effect of high-volume injectate in lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections: a randomized, active control trial. Pain Physician 2015; 18: 519-25. https://doi.org/10.36076/ppj.2015/18/E519
  4. Bhatia A, Flamer D, Shah PS, Cohen SP. Transforaminal epidural steroid injections for treating lumbosacral radicular pain from herniated intervertebral discs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2016; 122: 857-70. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001155
  5. Jordan J, Konstantinou K, O'Dowd J. Herniated lumbar disc. BMJ Clin Evid 2009; 2009: 1118.
  6. Sato M, Mikawa Y, Matuda A. Ultrasound and electrical nerve stimulation-guided S1 nerve root block. J Anesth 2013; 27: 775-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-013-1591-y
  7. Arman C, Naderi S, Kiray A, Aksu FT, Yilmaz HS, Tetik S, et al. The human sacrum and safe approaches for screw placement. J Clin Neurosci 2009; 16: 1046-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2008.07.081
  8. Cheng JS, Song JK. Anatomy of the sacrum. Neurosurg Focus 2003; 15: E3. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2003.15.2.3
  9. Povo A, Arantes M, Matzel KE, Barbosa J, Ferreira MA, Pais D, et al. Surface anatomical landmarks for the location of posterior sacral foramina in sacral nerve stimulation. Tech Coloproctol 2016; 20: 859-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1543-2
  10. Park YJ, Lee SH, Ryu KH, Kim YK, Shim J, Lee HW, et al. Novel method for S1 transforaminal epidural steroid injection. World Neurosurg 2020; 133: e443-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.09.051
  11. Hwang BY, Park JH, Ji HT, Kim GE, Kim SK, Lee YK, et al. Retrospective lumbosacral CT analysis and prospective observational study of the ipsilateral tunnel view technique for fluoroscopy-guided selective S1 transforaminal epidural injection. Pain Pract 2022; 22: 83-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13061
  12. Cha YD, Choi JK, Yang CW, Lim HK, Heo GA, Kim BG. Relationship between first dorsal sacral foramen and lumbar facet joint connecting line in South Korea populations: retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2017; 96: e7544. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007544
  13. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005; 30: 346-53. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000152379.54463.65
  14. Park D. Can ultrasound-guided S1 transforaminal epidural injection using the in-plane approach and color Doppler imaging be a safer alternative to lumbar inter-laminar epidural injection? Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 97: e66-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000856
  15. Gofeld M, Bristow SJ, Chiu SC, McQueen CK, Bollag L. Ultrasound-guided lumbar transforaminal injections: feasibility and validation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012; 37: 808-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182340096
  16. Evansa I, Logina I, Vanags I, Borgeat A. Ultrasound versus fluoroscopic-guided epidural steroid injections in patients with degenerative spinal diseases: a randomised study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2015; 32: 262-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000000103
  17. Hashemi M, Dadkhah P, Taheri M, Haji Seyed Abootorabi SM, Naderi-Nabi B. Ultrasound-guided lumbar transforaminal epidural injections; a single center fluoroscopic validation study. Bull Emerg Trauma 2019; 7: 251-5. https://doi.org/10.29252/beat-070307
  18. McGrath MC, Stringer MD. Bony landmarks in the sacral region: the posterior superior iliac spine and the second dorsal sacral foramina: a potential guide for sonography. Surg Radiol Anat 2011; 33: 279-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0735-0
  19. Kim SH, Yoon KB, Yoon DM, Choi SA, Kim EM. An analysis of location of needle entry point and palpated PSIS in S1 nerve root block. Korean J Pain 2010; 23: 242-6. https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2010.23.4.242
  20. Lee BJ, Han J, Park D. A video of ultrasound-guided S1 transforaminal epidural injection using color Doppler: technical reports. Pain Pract 2020; 20: 396-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.12858
  21. Price R, Okamoto M, Le Huec JC, Hasegawa K. Normative spino-pelvic parameters in patients with the lumbarization of S1 compared to a normal asymptomatic population. Eur Spine J 2016; 25: 3694-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4794-8
  22. Plaikner M, Gruber H, Schwabl C, Brenner E, Bale R, Skalla E, et al. A simple approach for ultrasoundguided pararadicular injections in the sacral spine: a pilot computer tomography controlled cadaver study. Med Ultrason 2019; 21: 125-30. https://doi.org/10.11152/mu-1823
  23. Park D. Ultrasound-guided S1 transforaminal epidural injection using the in-plane approach and color Doppler imaging. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2018; 97: e14-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000000754
  24. Bagheri H, Govsa F. Anatomical considerations of safe drilling corridor upper sacral segment screw insertion. J Orthop 2019; 16: 543-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2019.04.010
  25. Watanabe N, Takigawa T, Uotani K, Oda Y, Misawa H, Tanaka M, et al. Three-dimensional analysis of the ideal entry point for sacral alar iliac screws. Asian Spine J 2022. doi: 10.31616/asj.2021.0268.
  26. Oura P, Nurkkala M, Auvinen J, Niinimaki J, Karppinen J, Junno JA. The association of body size, shape and composition with vertebral size in midlife - the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 study. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 3944. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40880-4