References
- International Energy Agency (IEA), Global Electricity Generation Mix, 2010-2020 - Charts - Data & Statistics, IEA, 2021. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-electricity-generation-mix-2010-2020. (Accessed 3 July 2023).
- World Nuclear Association (WNA), Nuclear Power in Bangladesh - World Nuclear Association, 2023. World-Nuclear.org. https://world-nuclear.org/informationlibrary/country-profiles/countries-a-f/bangladesh.aspx. (Accessed 3 July 2023).
- Bangladesh National Portal (BNP), Construction of Rooppur Nuclear Power Plant Project, 2023. Www.rooppurnpp.gov.bd. (Accessed 3 July 2023). http://www.rooppurnpp.gov.bd/.
- S. Perez, C.D. Auwer, T. Pourcher, S. Russo, C. Drouot, M.R. Beccia, G. Creff, F. Fiorelli, A. Leriche, F. Castagnola, P. Steichen, G. Carle, H. Michel, N. Glaichenhaus, D. Josse, N. Pottier, D. Provitolo, Comparative analysis of the perception of nuclear risk in two populations (expert/non-expert) in France, Energy Rep. 6 (2020) 2288-2298, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.08.015.
- S.S. Ho, A.D. Leong, J. Looi, L. Chen, N. Pang, E. Tandoc, Science literacy or value predisposition? A meta-analysis of factors predicting public perceptions of benefits, risks, and acceptance of nuclear energy, Environ. Commun. 13 (2018) 457-471, https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1394891.
- G.T. Gardner, A.R. Tiemann, L.C. Gould, D.R. Deluca, L.W. Doob, J.A.J. Stolwijk, Risk and benefit perceptions, acceptability judgments, and self-reported actions toward nuclear power, J. Soc. Psychol. 116 (1982) 179-197, https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1982.9922770.
- Y. Tanaka, Major psychological factors determining public acceptance of the siting of nuclear facilities, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 34 (2004) 1147-1165, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02000.x.
- V.H.M. Visschers, C. Keller, M. Siegrist, Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: investigating an explanatory model, Energy Pol. 39 (2011) 3621-3629, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.064.
- V.H.M. Visschers, M. Siegrist, How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster, Risk Anal. 33 (2012) 333-347, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01861.x.
- S.C. Whitfield, E.A. Rosa, A. Dan, T. Dietz, The future of nuclear power: value orientations and risk perception, Risk Anal. 29 (2009) 425-437, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01155.x.
- Y. Sugiawan, S. Managi, Public acceptance of nuclear power plants in Indonesia: portraying the role of a multilevel governance system, Energy Strategy Rev. 26 (2019), 100427, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100427.
- R. Baggott, Nuclear power at druridge bay, Parliam. Aff. 51 (1998) 384-396, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pa.a028804.
- J. Juozaitis, Chapter 7 - international conflicts related to energy: a case study of Lithuania's opposition to the construction of Russian nuclear power plants near its borders, in: M. Tvaronaviciene, B. Slusarczyk (Eds.), Energy Transformation towards Sustainability, Elsevier, 2020, pp. 133-162, https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-817688-7.00007-0.
- T. O'Riordan, R. Kemp, M. Purdue, How the sizewell B inquiry is grappling with the concept of acceptable risk, J. Environ. Psychol. 5 (1985) 69-85, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(85)80039-6.
- M.L. Finucane, A. Alhakami, P. Slovic, S.M. Johnson, The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits, J. Behav. Decis. Making 13 (2000) 1-17, https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1%3C1::aid-bdm333%3E3.0.co;2-s.
- S. Ruggiero, T. Onkila, V. Kuittinen, Realizing the social acceptance of community renewable energy: a process-outcome analysis of stakeholder influence, Energy Res. Social Sci. 4 (2014) 53-63, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.09.001.
- International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Stakeholder Involvement throughout the Life Cycle of Nuclear Facilities, Iaea.org., 2011. https://www.iaea.org/publications/8694/stakeholder-involvement-throughout-the-life-cycle-of-nuclear-facilities. (Accessed 13 May 2023).
- Y. Yan, F. Lu, A survey and analysis on the sense of nuclear safety & security for the public: a Chinese perspective, Sustainability 10 (2018) 2495, https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072495.
- S. Roh, Big data analysis of public acceptance of nuclear power in korea, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 49 (2017) 850-854, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2016.12.015.
- J.-B. Chung, E.-S. Kim, Public perception of energy transition in Korea: nuclear power, climate change, and party preference, Energy Pol. 116 (2018) 137-144, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.007.
- T. Perko, B. Adam, K.R. Stassen, The differences in perception of radiological risks: lay people versus new and experienced employees in the nuclear sector, J. Risk Res. 18 (2014) 40-54, https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2013.879488.
- J. Harris, M. Hassall, G. Muriuki, C. Warnaar-Notschaele, E. McFarland, P. Ashworth, The demographics of nuclear power: comparing nuclear experts', scientists' and non-science professionals' views of risks, benefits and values, Energy Res. Social Sci. 46 (2018) 29-39, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.035.
- P. Slovic, Understanding perceived risk: 1978-2015, environ: sci. And policy for Sus, Development (Cambridge, U. K.) 58 (2015) 25-29, https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2016.1112169.
- S. Rothman, S.R. Lichter, Elite ideology and risk perception in nuclear energy policy, Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 81 (1987) 383-404, https://doi.org/10.2307/1961958.
- J.I.M. De Groot, L. Steg, Morality and nuclear energy: perceptions of risks and benefits, personal norms, and willingness to take action related to nuclear energy, Risk Anal. 30 (2010) 1363-1373, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01419.x.
- S.L. Alfee, M.S. Islam, Assessment of public perception towards the radioactive waste management of Bangladesh, Prog. Nucl. Energy 140 (2021), 103916, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2021.103916.
- A.S. Mollah, S. Sattar, M.A. Hossain, A.Z.M. Salahuddin, H.A. Rashid, Prospects of nuclear energy for sustainable energy development in Bangladesh, Int. J. Nucl. Energy Sci. Technol. 5 (2015) 28, https://doi.org/10.14355/ijnese.2015.05.004.
- S.N. Sadia, M.I. Hosan, S. Ahmed, Communal observation towards Rooppur nuclear power plant in Bangladesh, All Rights Reserved Journal of Electrical Energy Systems and Energy Conversion 3 (2018), 1 Page 1-13 © MANTECH PUBLICATIONS 2018, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329183921_Communal_Observation_towards_Rooppur_Nuclear_Power_Plant_in_Bangladesh. (Accessed 3 July 2023).
- S. Ahmed, M.I. Hosan, A. Begum, A.F.M.M. Rahman, M.A. Razzaque, Q.M. I. Hasani, Public awareness and stakeholder involvement for Bangladesh's nuclear power plant, Energy Strategy Rev. 32 (2020), 100564, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2020.100564.
- B.-M. Drottz-Sjoberg, L. Sjoberg, Risk perception and worries after the chernobyl accident, J. Environ. Psychol. 10 (1990) 135-149, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80124-0.
- J. Hughey, E. Sundstrom, Perceptions of three mile island and acceptance of a nuclear power plant in a distant community, J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 18 (1988) 880-890, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb01181.x.
- K. Bickerstaff, P. Simmons, N. Pidgeon, Constructing responsibilities for risk: negotiating citizen - state relationships, Environ. Plann.: Econ. Space 40 (2008) 1312-1330, https://doi.org/10.1068/a39150.
- N.F. Pidgeon, I. Lorenzoni, W. Poortinga, Climate change or nuclear power-No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain, Global Environ. Change 18 (2008) 69-85, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.005.
- S. Wang, J. Wang, S. Lin, J. Li, Public perceptions and acceptance of nuclear energy in China: the role of public knowledge, perceived benefit, perceived risk and public engagement, Energy Pol. 126 (2019) 352-360, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.040.
- X. Guo, H. Zhao, Z. He, Examining the influence of public participation on public acceptance of nuclear power plants: the case study of Qinshan NPP, China, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 58 (2020) 322-332, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2020.1828196.
- J.W. Kotrlik, J.E. Bartlett, C.C. Higgins, Organizational research: determining appropriate sample size in survey research appropriate sample size in survey research, Inf. Technol. Learn. Perform J. 19 (1) (2001).
- M.I. Hosan, M.J. Dewan, M.H. Sahadath, D. Roy, D. Roy, Assessment of public knowledge, perception, and acceptance of nuclear power in Bangladesh, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 55 (4) (2022) 1410-1419, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.12.003.
- M.S. Islam, A.H. Khan, M.S. Rana, Knowledge, belief, and attitude of Bangladeshi youth toward the development of nuclear power, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 7 (2021) 271-283, https://doi.org/10.3897/nucet.7.69414.
- E. Singer, P. Endreny, Reporting on Risk: How the Mass Media Portray Accidents, Diseases, Other Hazards, Russel Sage, New York, 1993.
- J.L. Durfee, "Social change" and "status quo" framing effects on risk perception, Sci. Commun. 27 (2006) 459-495, https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547005285334.
- P. Slovic, Baruch Fischhoff, S. Lichtenstein, Perceived Risk: Psychological Factors and Social Implications, The Royal Society, 1981. https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/abs/10.1098/rspa.1981.0073. (Accessed 3 July 2023).
- C.E. Dallas, Medical lessons learned from chernobyl relative to nuclear detonations and failed nuclear reactors, Disaster Med. Public Health Prep. 6 (2012) 330-334, https://doi.org/10.1001/dmp.2012.72.
- D. Deng, L. Zhang, M. Dong, R.E. Samuel, A. Ofori-Boadu, M. Lamssali, Radioactive waste: a review, Water Environ. Res. 92 (2020) 1818-1825, https://doi.org/10.1002/wer.1442.
- J.N. Druckman, The implications of framing effects for citizen competence, Polit. Behav. 23 (2001) 225-256, https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015006907312.
- S. Alvi, S.M.N. Nawaz, U. Khayyam, How does one motivate climate mitigation? Examining energy conservation, climate change, and personal perceptions in Bangladesh and Pakistan, Energy Res. Social Sci. 70 (2020), 101645, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101645.