Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A retrospective study of the long-term survival of RESTORE® dental implants with resorbable blast media surface

  • Keun-Soo Ryoo (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University and Seoul National University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Pil-Jong Kim (Biomedical Knowledge Engineering Laboratory, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University) ;
  • Sungtae Kim (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University and Seoul National University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Young-Dan Cho (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University and Seoul National University Dental Hospital) ;
  • Young Ku (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry and Dental Research Institute, Seoul National University and Seoul National University Dental Hospital)
  • Received : 2022.07.16
  • Accepted : 2022.12.21
  • Published : 2023.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the survival and failure rates of RESTORE® implants over a follow-up period of 10-15 years at a university dental hospital and to investigate the factors affecting the survival rate of these dental implants. Methods: A total of 247 RESTORE® dental implants with a resorbable blast media (RBM) surface inserted in 86 patients between March 2006 and April 2011 at the Department of Periodontology of Seoul National University Dental Hospital were included. Patients with follow-up periods of less than 10 years were excluded, and data analysis was conducted based on dental records and radiographs. Results: Over a 10- to 15-year period, the cumulative survival rate of the implants was 92.5%. Seventeen implants (6.88%) were explanted due to implant fracture (n=10, 4.05%), peri-implantitis (n=6, 2.43%), and screw fracture (n=1, 0.4%). The results of univariate regression analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model demonstrated that implants placed in male patients (hazard ratio [HR], 4.542; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.305-15.807; P=0.017) and implants that supported removable prostheses (HR, 15.498; 95% CI, 3.105-77.357; P=0.001) showed statistically significant associations with implant failure. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this retrospective study, the RESTORE® dental implant with an RBM surface has a favorable survival rate with stable clinical outcomes.

Keywords

References

  1. Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100.
  2. Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000 2017;73:7-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12185
  3. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981;10:387-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(81)80077-4
  4. Brugger OE, Bornstein MM, Kuchler U, Janner SF, Chappuis V, Buser D. Implant therapy in a surgical specialty clinic: an analysis of patients, indications, surgical procedures, risk factors, and early failures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:151-60. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3769
  5. von Arx T, Buser D. Horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and the guided bone regeneration technique with collagen membranes: a clinical study with 42 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:359-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01234.x
  6. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:216-40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01272.x
  7. Tan WC, Lang NP, Zwahlen M, Pjetursson BE. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. Part II: transalveolar technique. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:241-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2008.01273.x
  8. Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:611-9.
  9. Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Hirt HP, et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999;45:75-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199905)45:2<75::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-P
  10. Bornstein MM, Schmid B, Belser UC, Lussi A, Buser D. Early loading of non-submerged titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:631-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01209.x
  11. Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP, et al. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:144-53. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2002.130204.x
  12. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. On implant surfaces: a review of current knowledge and opinions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:63-74.
  13. Buser D, Janner SF, Wittneben JG, Bragger U, Ramseier CA, Salvi GE. 10-year survival and success rates of 511 titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a retrospective study in 303 partially edentulous patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:839-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2012.00456.x
  14. Fischer K, Stenberg T. Prospective 10-year cohort study based on a randomized controlled trial (RCT) on implant-supported full-arch maxillary prostheses. Part 1: sandblasted and acid-etched implants and mucosal tissue. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14:808-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00389.x
  15. Sanz A, Oyarzun A, Farias D, Diaz I. Experimental study of bone response to a new surface treatment of endosseous titanium implants. Implant Dent 2001;10:126-31. https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-200104000-00009
  16. Coelho PG, Granjeiro JM, Romanos GE, Suzuki M, Silva NR, Cardaropoli G, et al. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;88:579-96. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.31264
  17. Gonshor A, Goveia G, Sotirakis E. A prospective, multicenter, 4-year study of the ACE surgical resorbable blast media implant. J Oral Implantol 2003;29:174-80. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2003)029<0174:APMSOT>2.3.CO;2
  18. Kim YK, Kim BS, Yun PY, Mun SU, Yi YJ, Kim SG, et al. The seven-year cumulative survival rate of Osstem implants. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;40:68-75. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2014.40.2.68
  19. Hammerle CH, Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding the placement of implants in extraction sockets. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19 Suppl:26-8.
  20. Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29 Suppl 3:197-212. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.29.s3.12.x
  21. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Dental implants inserted in male versus female patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Oral Rehabil 2015;42:709-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12308
  22. McGrath C, Bedi R. Measuring the impact of oral health on quality of life in Britain using OHQoL-UK©. J Public Health Dent 2003;63:73-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2003.tb03478.x
  23. Shiau HJ, Reynolds MA. Sex differences in destructive periodontal disease: exploring the biologic basis. J Periodontol 2010;81:1505-17. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100045
  24. Eke PI, Dye BA, Wei L, Thornton-Evans GO, Genco RJ; CDC Periodontal Disease Surveillance Workgroup. Prevalence of periodontitis in adults in the United States: 2009 and 2010. J Dent Res 2012;91:914-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034512457373
  25. Freitag-Wolf S, Dommisch H, Graetz C, Jockel-Schneider Y, Harks I, Staufenbiel I, et al. Genome-wide exploration identifies sex-specific genetic effects of alleles upstream NPY to increase the risk of severe periodontitis in men. J Clin Periodontol 2014;41:1115-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.12317
  26. Cosme DC, Baldisserotto SM, de Andrade Canabarro S, Shinkai RS. Bruxism and voluntary maximal bite force in young dentate adults. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:328-32.
  27. Tuxen A, Bakke M, Pinholt EM. Comparative data from young men and women on masseter muscle fibres, function and facial morphology. Arch Oral Biol 1999;44:509-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9969(99)00008-4
  28. Chang M, Chronopoulos V, Mattheos N. Impact of excessive occlusal load on successfully-osseointegrated dental implants: a literature review. J Investig Clin Dent 2013;4:142-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/jicd.12036
  29. Chrcanovic BR, Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Periodontally compromised vs. periodontally healthy patients and dental implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent 2014;42:1509-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.09.013
  30. Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Lang NP. Comparative biology of chronic and aggressive periodontitis vs. peri-implantitis. Periodontol 2000 2010;53:167-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00348.x
  31. Botero JE, Gonzalez AM, Mercado RA, Olave G, Contreras A. Subgingival microbiota in peri-implant mucosa lesions and adjacent teeth in partially edentulous patients. J Periodontol 2005;76:1490-5. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.9.1490
  32. Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E Jr, Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987;2:145-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.1987.tb00298.x
  33. Mombelli A, Buser D, Lang NP. Colonization of osseointegrated titanium implants in edentulous patients. Early results. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1988;3:113-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302X.1988.tb00095.x
  34. Shibli JA, Melo L, Ferrari DS, Figueiredo LC, Faveri M, Feres M. Composition of supra- and subgingival biofilm of subjects with healthy and diseased implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:975-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01566.x
  35. Ferreira SD, Silva GL, Cortelli JR, Costa JE, Costa FO. Prevalence and risk variables for peri-implant disease in Brazilian subjects. J Clin Periodontol 2006;33:929-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01001.x
  36. Karoussis IK, Salvi GE, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Bragger U, Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:329-39. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.000.00934.x
  37. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (I). Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:527-51. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836..t01-2-.x
  38. Quirynen M, Teughels W. Microbiologically compromised patients and impact on oral implants. Periodontol 2000 2003;33:119-28. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0906-6713.2003.03310.x