DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Photo-crosslinked gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel strengthened with calcium phosphate-based nanoparticles for early healing of rabbit calvarial defects

  • Da-Na Lee (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jin-Young Park (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Young-Wook Seo (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Xiang Jin (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) ;
  • Jongmin Hong (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Amitava Bhattacharyya (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Insup Noh (Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Seong-Ho Choi (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
  • Received : 2022.07.12
  • Accepted : 2022.10.24
  • Published : 2023.10.30

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of photo-crosslinked gelatin methacryloyl (GelMa) hydrogel containing calcium phosphate nanoparticles (CNp) when applying different fabrication methods for bone regeneration. Methods: Four circular defects were created in the calvaria of 10 rabbits. Each defect was randomly allocated to the following study groups: 1) the sham control group, 2) the GelMa group (defect filled with crosslinked GelMa hydrogel), 3) the CNp-GelMa group (GelMa hydrogel crosslinked with nanoparticles), and 4) the CNp+GelMa group (crosslinked GelMa loaded with nanoparticles). At 2, 4, and 8 weeks, samples were harvested, and histological and micro-computed tomography analyses were performed. Results: Histomorphometric analysis showed that the CNp-GelMa and CNp+GelMa groups at 2 weeks had significantly greater total augmented areas than the control group (P<0.05). The greatest new bone area was observed in the CNp-GelMa group, but without statistical significance (P>0.05). Crosslinked GelMa hydrogel with nanoparticles exhibited good biocompatibility with a minimal inflammatory reaction. Conclusions: There was no difference in the efficacy of bone regeneration according to the synthesized method of photo-crosslinked GelMa hydrogel with nanoparticles. However, these materials could remain within a bone defect up to 2 weeks and showed good biocompatibility with little inflammatory response. Further improvement in mechanical properties and resistance to enzymatic degradation would be needed for the clinical application.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by a faculty research grant of Yonsei University College of Dentistry for 2021 (6-2021-0020).

References

  1. Jiao Y, Li C, Liu L, Wang F, Liu X, Mao J, et al. Construction and application of textile-based tissue engineering scaffolds: a review. Biomater Sci 2020;8:3574-600.
  2. Lee KY, Mooney DJ. Hydrogels for tissue engineering. Chem Rev 2001;101:1869-79.
  3. Serafim A, Tucureanu C, Petre DG, Dragusin DM, Salageanu A, Van Vlierberghe S, et al. One-pot synthesis of superabsorbent hybrid hydrogels based on methacrylamide gelatin and polyacrylamide. Effortless control of hydrogel properties through composition design. New J Chem 2014;38:3112-26.
  4. Yue K, Trujillo-de Santiago G, Alvarez MM, Tamayol A, Annabi N, Khademhosseini A. Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 2015;73:254-71.
  5. Annabi N, Nichol JW, Zhong X, Ji C, Koshy S, Khademhosseini A, et al. Controlling the porosity and microarchitecture of hydrogels for tissue engineering. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2010;16:371-83.
  6. Li Y, Rodrigues J, Tomas H. Injectable and biodegradable hydrogels: gelation, biodegradation and biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev 2012;41:2193-221.
  7. McBeth C, Lauer J, Ottersbach M, Campbell J, Sharon A, Sauer-Budge AF. 3D bioprinting of GelMA scaffolds triggers mineral deposition by primary human osteoblasts. Biofabrication 2017;9:015009.
  8. Rahali K, Ben Messaoud G, Kahn CJ, Sanchez-Gonzalez L, Kaci M, Cleymand F, et al. Synthesis and characterization of nanofunctionalized gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Int J Mol Sci 2017;18:2675.
  9. Xiao S, Zhao T, Wang J, Wang C, Du J, Ying L, et al. Gelatin methacrylate (GelMA)-based hydrogels for cell transplantation: an effective strategy for tissue engineering. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2019;15:664-79.
  10. Van Den Bulcke AI, Bogdanov B, De Rooze N, Schacht EH, Cornelissen M, Berghmans H. Structural and rheological properties of methacrylamide modified gelatin hydrogels. Biomacromolecules 2000;1:31-8.
  11. Liu Y, Chan-Park MB. A biomimetic hydrogel based on methacrylated dextran-graft-lysine and gelatin for 3D smooth muscle cell culture. Biomaterials 2010;31:1158-70.
  12. Wang N, Ma M, Luo Y, Liu TZ, Zhou P, Qi SC, et al. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles-reinforced hydrogel scaffold together with pinacidil loading to improve stem cell adhesion. Chemnanomat 2018;4:631-41.
  13. Heo DN, Ko WK, Bae MS, Lee JB, Lee DW, Byun W, et al. Enhanced bone regeneration with a gold nanoparticle-hydrogel complex. J Mater Chem B Mater Biol Med 2014;2:1584-93.
  14. Zhang Y, Sun M, Liu T, Hou M, Yang H. Effect of different additives on the mechanical properties of gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel: a meta-analysis. ACS Omega 2021;6:9112-28.
  15. Noh I, Kim N, Tran HN, Lee J, Lee C. 3D printable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel for its potential application as a bioink in tissue engineering. Biomater Res 2019;23:3.
  16. Bhattacharyya A, Janarthanan G, Kim T, Taheri S, Shin J, Kim J, et al. Modulation of bioactive calcium phosphate micro/nanoparticle size and shape during in situ synthesis of photo-crosslinkable gelatin methacryloyl based nanocomposite hydrogels for 3D bioprinting and tissue engineering. Biomater Res 2022;26:54.
  17. Park JY, Yang C, Jung IH, Lim HC, Lee JS, Jung UW, et al. Regeneration of rabbit calvarial defects using cells-implanted nano-hydroxyapatite coated silk scaffolds. Biomater Res 2015;19:7.
  18. Hong I, Khalid AW, Pae HC, Cha JK, Lee JS, Paik JW, et al. Distinctive bone regeneration of calvarial defects using biphasic calcium phosphate supplemented ultraviolet-crosslinked collagen membrane. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2019;50:14-27.
  19. Mora-Boza A, Lopez-Donaire ML. Preparation of polymeric and composite scaffolds by 3D bioprinting. Adv Exp Med Biol 2018;1058:221-45.
  20. Trombetta R, Inzana JA, Schwarz EM, Kates SL, Awad HA. 3D printing of calcium phosphate ceramics for bone tissue engineering and drug delivery. Ann Biomed Eng 2017;45:23-44.
  21. Heltmann-Meyer S, Steiner D, Muller C, Schneidereit D, Friedrich O, Salehi S, et al. Gelatin methacryloyl is a slow degrading material allowing vascularization and long-term use in vivo. Biomed Mater 2021;16.
  22. Cha JK, Jung UW, Thoma DS, Hammerle CH, Jung RE. Osteogenic efficacy of BMP-2 mixed with hydrogel and bone substitute in peri-implant dehiscence defects in dogs: 16 weeks of healing. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:300-8.
  23. Park JI, Yang C, Kim YT, Kim MS, Lee JS, Choi SH, et al. Space maintenance using crosslinked collagenated porcine bone grafted without a barrier membrane in one-wall intrabony defects. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2014;102:1454-61.
  24. Retzepi M, Donos N. Guided bone regeneration: biological principle and therapeutic applications. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:567-76.
  25. Zhu M, Wang Y, Ferracci G, Zheng J, Cho NJ, Lee BH. Gelatin methacryloyl and its hydrogels with an exceptional degree of controllability and batch-to-batch consistency. Sci Rep 2019;9:6863.
  26. Pepelanova I, Kruppa K, Scheper T, Lavrentieva A. Gelatin-methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels with defined degree of functionalization as a versatile toolkit for 3D cell culture and extrusion bioprinting. Bioengineering (Basel) 2018;5:55.
  27. Elkhoury K, Russell CS, Sanchez-Gonzalez L, Mostafavi A, Williams TJ, Kahn C, et al. Soft-nanoparticle functionalization of natural hydrogels for tissue engineering applications. Adv Healthc Mater 2019;8:e1900506.
  28. Xing W, Tang Y. On mechanical properties of nanocomposite hydrogels: Searching for superior properties. Nano Mater Sci 2022;4:83-96.
  29. Dannert C, Stokke BT, Dias RS. Nanoparticle-hydrogel composites: from molecular interactions to macroscopic behavior. Polymers (Basel) 2019;11:275.
  30. Dong Z, Yuan Q, Huang K, Xu W, Liu G, Gu Z. Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)-based biomaterials for bone regeneration. RSC Advances 2019;9:17737-44.
  31. Modaresifar K, Hadjizadeh A, Niknejad H. Design and fabrication of GelMA/chitosan nanoparticles composite hydrogel for angiogenic growth factor delivery. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 2018;46:1799-808.
  32. Sohn JY, Park JC, Um YJ, Jung UW, Kim CS, Cho KS, et al. Spontaneous healing capacity of rabbit cranial defects of various sizes. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2010;40:180-7.