References
- Kim, B., & Lee, H. (2018). The critical review of equality and justice in education. Korean Education Inquiry, 36(3), 197-219. https://doi.org/10.22327/kei.2018.36.3.197
- Lee, H., Park, C., & Huh, N. (2012). Effect of contextual variables on mathematics achievement - Based on analysis of TIMSS 2007 using path analysis-. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 15(3), 585-603.
- Jung, J. (2016). Courage to face onself: A study of the meaning of the currere experience in a curriculum course. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(3), 103-126.
- Cho, S., & Ju, M.-K. (2023). Teaching mathematics for equity: An analysis of the effect of diversity-inclusive instruction and the mediating effect of teacher-student relationship on the mathematics achievement of Korean students with a low economic status. Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society, 26(2), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.30807/ksms.2023.26.2.001
- Choi, Y., & Cho, D. (2011). A study on the implementation of autobiographical method in pre-service teacher education. The Journal of Anthropology of Education, 14(3), 69-101. https://doi.org/10.17318/JAE.2011.14.3.003
- Han, H. (2005). The autobiographical method as self-reflection and teaching method. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(2), 117-132.
- Beauchamp, C., & Thomas, L. (2009). Understanding teacher identity: An overview of issues in the literature and implications for teacher education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(2), 175-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640902902252
- Beijaard, E., Meijer, P.C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers' professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 107-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001
- Chun, T. Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Medicine, 7, 2050312118822927. PMID: 30637106; PMCID: PMC6318722. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118822927
- de Freitas, E. (2008). Troubling teacher identity: Preparing mathematics teachers to teach for diversity. Teaching Education, 19(1), 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210701860024
- Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99-125.
- Lutovac, S., & Kaasila, R. (2014). Pre-service teachers' future-oriented mathematical identity work. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85, 129-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9500-8
- MacLure, M. (1993). Arguing for your self: Identity as an organising principle in teachers' jobs and lives. British Educational Research Journal, 19(4), 311-323. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192930190401
- NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: NCTM.
- Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum as autobiographical/ biographical text. In Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses (Vol. 17, pp. 515-566). Counterpoints.
- Ramsey, S. J. (2004). Autobiography of a teacher: A journey toward critical multiculturalism. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 2(3), 45-52.
- Trent, J. (2010). Teacher education as identity construction: Insights from action research. Journal of Education for Teaching, 36(2), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607471003651672
- Zevenbergen, R. (2003). Teachers' beliefs about teaching mathematics to students from socially-disadvantaged backgrounds: Implications for social justice. In L. Burton (Ed.), Which way social justice in mathematics education? (pp. 133-151). Westport CT: Praeger.