해양안보 (Maritime Security)

한국해양전략연구소 (Korea Institute for Maritime Strategy)
권호 표지

집단안보체제의 형성 및 발전요인과 동아시아 안보체제의 변화 가능성 연구

A Study on the Formation and Development of Collective Security System and the Possibility of Security System Shift in East Asia

  • 투고 : 2023.08.30
  • 심사 : 2023.11.01
  • 발행 : 2023.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

동북아시아에서는 '바큇살 구조'라 불리우는 미국 중심의 양자동맹체제가 지속되고 있다. 그러나 최근 급변하는 동아시아의 국제정세와 이에 대응하기 위해 국가들 간 다각도로 협력하는 양상들을 보았을 때, 이러한 동맹체제의 변화 가능성에 대해서 진단해 볼 필요성이 제기되었다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 주 위협, 위협의 강도, 국가 간 신뢰도라는 요인을 바탕으로, 유럽과 동남아시아의 집단안보체제에 관한 사례연구 및 비교분석을 통해 이에 대한 영향을 분석하였다. 본 연구는 이를 바탕으로 동북아에서의 안보체제 변화 가능성에 대해서 연구를 진행하였으며, 현재의 갈등이 지속적으로 악화된다면 동북아를 넘어 동아시아 전반에서의 집단안보체제가 형성될 가능성이 분명히 존재한다고 보았다.

For the last 70 years, the U.S.-led bilateral security system, or "Hub-and-Spokes" system, has been applied to Northeast Asia, and the system has been successfully settled in terms of stability and economic achievements of the region. Given the increasing complexity of the security environment of East Asia, it is plausible to consider the possibility of a security system shift from bilateral alliances to collective security. In order to analyze the driver of collective security system, this study developed three factors of formation and development of collective security system - main threat, intensity of the threat, and confidence among countries in the system - by reviewing international political theories related to security cooperation. Comparing the formation, development, and achievements of NATO and SEATO, the study figures out that the existence of the main threat, the high intensity of the threat, and the strong confidence among countries in the security system are the primary drivers for a successful collective security system. Based on the result, the study also analyzed the possibility of a security system shift in East Asia. Considering contemporary international conflicts such as U.S.-China strategic competition, Russia-Ukraine War, and growing threats posed by North Korean nuclear and missiles, the study anticipates that the necessity of a collective security system that will replace the current security system of the region would arise. Still, although some issues between countries should be overcome, the growing intensity of the threats will promote cooperation among countries by improving their confidence.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Acharaya, Amitav Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the Problem of Regional Order. London: Routledge, 2000.
  2. Cha, Victor D. Alignment Despite Antagonism: The United States-Korea-Japan Security Triangle. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2000.
  3. Cha, Victor D. Powerplay: The Origins of the American Alliance System in Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2016.
  4. Green, Michael J. By More than Providence: Grand Strategy and American Power in the Asia Pacific since 1783. New York: Columbia University Press, 2017.
  5. Haas, Ernst B. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces 1950-1957, 3rd edition. Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, 2004.
  6. Hearden, Patric J. Vietnam: Four American Perspectives. Indiana: Purdue University Press, 1990.
  7. Ireland, Timothy P. Creating the Entangling Alliance: The Origins of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1981.
  8. Jervis, Robert. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.
  9. O'Neil, Daniel C. Dividing ASEAN and Conquering the South China Sea. Hongkong: Hongkong University Press, 2018.
  10. Osgood, Robert E. NATO: The Entangling Alliance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
  11. Rosecrance, Richard N. Defense of the Realm: British Strategy in the Nuclear Epoch. New York: Columbia Univeristy Press, 1968.
  12. Walt, Stephen M. The Origins of Alliance. Cornell: Cornell University Press, 1987.
  13. Waltz, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1979. 
  14. 김성한. "지역주의와 다자동맹: 동아시아에서의 공존 가능성에 대한 시론." 「국제정치논총」 제48집 4호, 2008년 12월.
  15. 김일한. "안보환경의 변화와 동아시아 다자안보협력: ARF(ASEAN Regional Forum)을 중심으로." 「글로벌 정치연구」 제5권 1호, 2012.
  16. 김철민. "동유럽을 향한 NATO 동진 정책과 러시아: 현황과 사례분석을 중심으로." 「동유럽 발칸연구」 제40권 5호, 2016년 10월.
  17. 민병원. "신(新)안보딜레마와 네트워크 국제정치." 「평화연구」 2020년 봄.
  18. 박철희 외. "미중 전략경쟁과 한국의 선택." Global Strategy Report. 서울: 서울대학교 국제학연구소, 2020.
  19. 이원우. "안보협력 개념들의 의미 분화와 적용: 안보연구와 정책에 주는 함의." 「국제정치논총」 제51집 1호, (2011년).
  20. Biden, Joseph R. Jr., "Why America Must Lead Again: Rescuing U.S. Foreign Policy after Trump." Foreign Affairs, Vol. 99, No. 2, March/April 2020.
  21. Braibanti, Ralph. "The Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty." Pacific Affairs. Vol. 30, No. 4, December 1957.
  22. Cha, Victor D. "Collective Resilience: Deterring China's Weaponization of Economic Interdependence." International Security, Vol. 48, Issue 1, Summer 2023.
  23. Dulles, John Foster. "Policy for Security and Peace." Foreign Affairs, Vol. 32, No. 3, April 1954.
  24. Hemmer, Christopher and Katzenstein, Peter. "Why is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism, and Origins of Multilateralism." International Organization, Vol. 56, No. 3, Summer 2002.
  25. Jervis, Robert. "Impact of Korean War." Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 24, No. 4, December 1980.
  26. Mearsheimer, John J. "The False Promise of International Institutions." International Security, Vol. 19, No. 3, Winter 1994/1995.
  27. Shilling, Warner R. "The Politics of National Defense: Fiscal 1950," Strategy, Politics, and Defense Budgets, Edited by W. Shilling, P. Hammond, and G. Snyder. New York: Columbia University Press, 1962.
  28. Snyder, Glenn H. "Alliance Theory: A Neorealist First Cut." Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 44, No. 1, Spring/Summer 1990. 
  29. 정아란, 안용수, 이동환. "한미일, '새시대' 선언...오커스.쿼드 이상 印太핵심협력체 탄생." 연합뉴스. https://www.yna.co.kr/view/AKR20230819014900001?section=politics/all (검색일: 2023.8.19.).
  30. ASEAN Studies Centre. The State of Southeast Asia: 2023 Survey Report. ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. February 9, 2023.
  31. Hansler, Jennifer. "Antony Blinken Sworn in as Biden's Secretary of State." CNN Politics, 26, January 2021.
  32. Memorandum by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to the Security of Defense(Wilson), May 21, 1954. Foreign Relations of the United States(FRUS), 1952-1954, Volume VII: East Asia and the Pacific. pp.514-516.
  33. Memorandum by Robert A. Feary of Northeast Asian Affairs, Feburary 16, 1951. Foregin Relations of the Unites States(FRUS), 1951, Asia and the Pacific, Volume VI: East Asia and the Pacific: Multilateral Relations, Part I. pp.156-164.
  34. Minutes of a Meeting of Southeast Asia, July 24, 1954. Foreign Relations of the United States(FRUS), 1952-1954, Volume II: East Asia and the Pacific, part I. pp.665-671.
  35. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. "A Short History of NATO." https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/declassified_139339.htm (검색일: 2023.4.28.).
  36. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. "Chicago Summit Declaration." https://www.nato.int/cps/en/SID-B83237D5 (검색일: 2023.5.2.).
  37. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. "Collective Defense - Article 5." https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_110496.htm (검색일: 2023.4.28.)
  38. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. "Finland & Sweden Accession." https://www.nato-pa.int/content/finland-sweden-accession (검색일: 2023.7.26.).
  39. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Strategic Concept: for the Defense and Security of the Members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Novermber 2010.
  40. NSC 5429/2: "Statement of Policy by the National Security Council on Review of U.S. Policy in the Far East," August 20, 1954. Foreign Relations of the United States(FRUS), 1952-1954, Volume VII: East Asia and the Pacific, part I. pp.771-774.
  41. NSC 68: "United States Objectives and Programs for National Security," April 14, 1950. https://irp.fas.org/offdocs/nsc-hst/nsc-68.htm (검색일: 2023.4.18.).
  42. Organization for Security Cooperation in Europe. "Ensuring Military Transparency - the Vienna Document." https://www.osce.org/fsc/74528 (검색일: 2023.4.21.).
  43. Pelley, Scott. "President Joe Biden: The 2022 60 Minutes Interview," CBS News(September 18, 2022), https://www.cbsnews.com/news/president-joe-biden-60-minutes-interview-transcript-2022-09-18/ (검색일: 2023.5.4.).
  44. U.S. Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe. "The Helsinki Process and the OSCE." https://www.csce.gov/about-csce/helsinki-process-and-osce (검색일: 2023.4.30.).