Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences

The Korean Space Science Society (한국우주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Calibration of ShadowCam

  • Received : 2023.11.09
  • Accepted : 2023.11.30
  • Published : 2023.12.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

ShadowCam is a high-sensitivity, high-resolution imager provided by NASA for the Danuri (KPLO) lunar mission. ShadowCam calibration shows that it is well suited for its purpose, to image permanently shadowed regions (PSRs) that occur near the lunar poles. It is 205 times as sensitive as the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera (LROC) Narrow Angle Camera (NAC). The signal to noise ratio (SNR) is greater than 100 over a large part of the dynamic range, and the top of the dynamic range is high enough to accommodate most brighter PSR pixels. The optical performance is good enough to take full advantage of the 1.7 meter/pixel image scale, and calibrated images have uniform response. We describe some instrument artifacts that are amenable to future corrections, making it possible to improve performance further. Stray light control is very challenging for this mission. In many cases, ShadowCam can image shadowed areas with directly illuminated terrain in or near the field of view (FOV). We include thorough qualitative descriptions of circumstances under which lunar brightness levels far higher than the top of the dynamic range cause detector or stray light artifacts and the size and extent of the artifact signal under those circumstances.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge G. L. Peterson and P. McClellan of the Breault Research Organization for the stray light modeling.

References

  1. Breault RP, Control of stray light , in Handbook of Optics, eds. Bass M, DeCusatis, Enoch J, Lakshminarayanan V, Li G, MacDonald C, Mahajan, V Van Stryland E (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2009).
  2. Fest E, Stray Light Analysis and Control (SPIE, Bellingham, WA, 2013).
  3. Glaser P, Oberst J, Neumann GA, Mazarico E, Speyerer EJ, et al., Illumination conditions at the lunar poles: implications for future exploration, Planet. Space Sci. 162, 170-178 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pss.2017.07.006
  4. Hecht E, Optics (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1987).
  5. Humm DC, Tschimmel M, Brylow SM, Mahanti P, Tran TN, et al., Flight calibration of the LROC narrow angle camera, Space Sci. Rev. 200, 431-473 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-015-0201-8
  6. Robinson MS, Brylow SM, Tschimmel M, Humm D, Lawrence SJ, et al., Lunar reconnaissance orbiter camera (LROC) instrument overview, Space Sci. Rev. 150, 81-124 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-010-9634-2
  7. Robinson MS, Brylow SM, Caplinger MA, Carter LM, Clark MJ, et al., ShadowCam instrument and investigation overview, J. Astron. Space Sci. 40, 149-171 (2023). https://doi.org/10.5140/JASS.2023.40.4.149
  8. Shoemaker EM, Robinson MS, Eliason EM, The South pole region of the Moon as seen by Clementine, Sci. 266, 1851-1854 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.266.5192
  9. Wagner, R. V., A. K. Boyd, P. Mahanti, M. S. Robinson, Empirical Measurements of Earthshine Illumination on the Moon, in European Lunar Symposium, Padua, Italy, 27-29 Jun 2023.
  10. Watson K, Murray BC, Brown H, The behavior of volatiles on the lunar surface, J. Geophys. Res. 66, 3033-3045 (1961). https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ066i009p03033