한국산업보건학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene)

  • 제33권4호
  • /
  • Pages.464-470
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2384-132X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-0564(eISSN)
한국산업보건학회 (Korean Industrial Hygiene Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

석탄화력발전소 작업자의 소음과 온열 스트레스에 대한 노출 평가

Evaluation of Occupational Exposure to Noise and Heat stress in Coal-fired Power Plants

  • 권지운 (소방청 국립소방연구원) ;
  • 장광명 ((주)대동) ;
  • 김성호 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 김세동 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 장미연 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 노지원 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원) ;
  • 박승현 (한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원)
  • Jiwoon Kwon (National Fire Research Institute, National Fire Agency) ;
  • Kwang-Myong Jang (Daedong Corporation) ;
  • Sungho Kim (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency) ;
  • Se-Dong Kim (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency) ;
  • Miyeon Jang (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency) ;
  • Jiwon Ro (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency) ;
  • Seunghyun Park (Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety & Health Agency)
  • 투고 : 2023.10.31
  • 심사 : 2023.12.28
  • 발행 : 2023.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: This study evaluated occupational exposures to noise and heat stress during routine non-outage works in three coal-fired power plants in the Republic of Korea. Methods: The data were collected during the summer of 2020. Full shift noise exposure of 52 workers were measured using noise dosimeters. Heat stress of 16 worksites were measured for 70 minutes using wet-bulb globe temperature monitors. Results: The noise dosimetry results revealed time-weighted averages that ranged from 47.5 to 88.9 dBA. 2 out of 52 noise measurements exceeded 85 dBA. Based on the arithmetic mean, the coal service group showed the highest level at 80.2 dBA by job tasks. Noise exposures exceeding 85 dBA were measured in the coal service and plant operator group. Heat stress index measurements ranged from 20.3℃ to 37.2℃. 1 out of 9 indices measured in coal facilities and 4 out of 7 indices measured in boiler house exceeded 1 hour TWA during moderate work. Heat stress indices measured from boiler houses were significantly higher than those measured from coal equipment. Conclusions: The results show that overexposure to noise and heat stress may be encountered during routine non-outage work activities in coal-fired power plants. Appropriate actions should be taken to reduce future health outcome from occupational exposure to noise and heat stress in the industry.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists(ACGIH). 2022 TLVs and BEIs - Based on the documentation of the Threshhold Limit Values for chemical substances and physical agents and Biological Exposure Indices. Ohio: ACGIH; 2022. p. 132, 233 
  2. Bird MJ, Maclntosh DL, Williams PL. Occupational exposure during routine activities in coal-fired power plants. J Occu Environ Hyg 2004;1:403-413. (http://doi.org/10.1080/15459620490453346) 
  3. Cantley LF, Galusha D, Cullen MR, Dixon-Ernst C, Tessier-Sherman B et al. Does tinnitus, hearing asymmetry, or hearing loss predispose to occupational injury risk?. Int J Audiol 2015;54(sup1): S30-S36 (http://doi.org/10.3109/14992027.2014.981305) 
  4. Choi SW, Peek-Asa C, Sprince NL, Rautiainen RH, Donham KJ et al. Hearing loss as a risk factor for agricultural injuries. Am J Ind Med 2005;48(4): 293-301 (http://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.20214) 
  5. Engelbrecht J, Tau P, Hongoro C. Occupational health hazards of fabric bag filter workers' exposure to coal fly ash. JTEHS 2012;4(3):57-64  https://doi.org/10.5897/JTEHS12.009
  6. Gao C, Kuklane K, Ostergren PO, Kjellstrom T. Occupational heat stress assessment and protective strategies in the context of climate change. Int J Biometeorol 2018;62:359-371 (http://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-017-1352-y) 
  7. Hicks J, Yager J. Airborne crystalline silica concentrations at coal-fired power plants associated with coal fly ash. J Occu Environ Hyg 2006;3:448-455 (http://doi.org/10.1080/15459620600802747) 
  8. Korea Electric Power Corporation(KEPCO). 2022 Statistics of electric power in Korea. KEPCO; 2023. p. 20 
  9. Lee ES, Lee YK, Shin DI. A Study on occupational environment assessment strategies for respirable particulate matter at coal-fired power plants. J Korean Soc Occup Environ Hyg 2023;33(3):375-383 (http://doi.org/10.15269/JKSOEH.2023.33.3.3) 
  10. Ministry of Employment and Labor(MoEL). Exposure limits for chemical substances and physical agents(MoEL Public Notice No. 2020-48).; 2020 
  11. Ministry of Employment and Labor(MoEL). Notification on the measurement of work envorinment and quality control(MoEL Public Notice No. 2020-44).; 2020. 
  12. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). Health Hazard Evaluation Report. HETA 82-093-1453. NIOSH; 1984. p. 15 
  13. Petrick ME, Royster RH, Royster JD, Reist P. Comparison of daily noise exposures in one workplace based on noise criteria recommended by ACGIH and OSHA. Am Ind Hyg J 1996;57:924-928 (https://doi.org/10.1080/15428119691014440) 
  14. Skogstad M, Johannessen HA, Tynes T, Mehlum IS, Nordby KC. Systematic review of the cardiovascular effects of occupational noise. Occup Med 2016; 66(1):10-16 (http://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqv148) 
  15. Sriwattanatamma P, Breysse P. Comparison of NIOSH noise criteria and OSHA hearing conservation criteria. Am J Ind Med 2000;37:334-338 (https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(200004)37:4<334::AIDAJIM2>3.0.CO;2-Z) 
  16. Yager JW, Hicks JB, Fabianova E. Airborne arsenic and urinary excretion of arsenic metabolites during boiler cleaning operations in a Slovak coal-fired power plant. Environ Health Perspect 1997;105(8):836-842 (https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.97105836)