DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Differences in Perception of Quality Dental Job Conditions and Job Satisfaction between Dentists and Dental Hygienists

  • 투고 : 2023.12.01
  • 심사 : 2023.12.18
  • 발행 : 2023.12.31

초록

Background: This study aims to investigate the perceptions of dentists and dental hygienists regarding quality dental job conditions and to identify differences in perceptions based on job type. Methods: As a result of conducting face-to-face and online surveys, data from a total of 132 people were analyzed. In order to investigate the perception of quality job conditions, the importance of a total of 13 items was investigated, and the work policies and job satisfaction of the current workplace were examined. Since the data did not follow a normal distribution, a non-parametric test, the Mann-Whitney U test, was performed. Results: Both dentists and dental hygienists perceived income and working hours to be of priority importance for quality job conditions. Dental hygienists valued holiday support and welfare, human relations, and personal development potential more than dentists (p<0.05). Looking at differences by job type, dental hygienists rated all conditions as more important than dentists except income, indicating a statistically significant difference (p<0.05). In terms of the work policies, 96.2% of the practices in the study were required to have the four types of social security contributions, but fewer had flexible working hours (19.7%), healthcare support (23.5%), and incentives (25.0%). Of the participants, 60.6% had parental leave available at their workplace, and dental hygienists had statistically significantly higher job satisfaction when parental leave was available (2.57 points) than when it was not (p<0.05). Conclusion: Quality dental jobs are an important factor in keeping workers happy and maintaining an efficient practice. Dental practice owners need to pay attention to the quality of jobs required by the dental workforce, provide flexible working hours and welfare programs such as parental leave, and create a workplace atmosphere and human resource management system that supports the use of these programs.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. International Labour Organization (ILO): Decent work indicators: concepts and definitions. ILO, Geneva, 2012.
  2. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD): OECD employment outlook 2019: the future of work. OECD Publishing, Paris, 2019.
  3. Kim KS: The effects of public job quality on the attitude and behavior of employees: moderating role of integrative leadership. KJPA 31: 59-99, 2022. https://doi.org/10.22897/kipajn.2022.31.1.003
  4. You JW, Song IH: The effects of quality of employment on the depressive mood among paid workers: an analysis of the mediating effect of perceived economic status. Ment Health Soc Work 44: 106-133, 2016.
  5. Lee IJ, Lee SC, Kim YK: The effects of job satisfaction on job performance with the moderating effects of leadership. J Korea Contents Assoc 19: 544-555, 2019. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2019.19.08.544
  6. Bea SH, Choi SJ: The effect of job relatedness of content in learning, job stress and organization communication on turnover intention and mediating effect of job satisfaction. J Vocat Educ Res 35: 113-141, 2016.
  7. Jeong HS: Job creation for health care professionals. Health and Social Affairs. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Sejong, pp.14-27, 2017.
  8. Ahn SL, Ha TJ: Changes in industrial and occupational characteristics of social service jobs. Korea Institute for Health and Social Affairs, Sejong, pp.1-12, 2022.
  9. Yoon SU, Oh NR, Jeong M: Influence on job satisfaction of emotional labor accordance to working properties and patients type of dental hygienist. J Korea Contents Assoc 18: 199-208, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2018.18.09.199
  10. Shim HS, Lee HN: A study on factors affecting the job satisfaction of dental hygienists in part areas. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 10: 555-565, 2010.
  11. Lee CS, Park SY, Park HM, et al.: Influential job-related characteristics for the job satisfaction and turnover possibility of dental hygienists. J Dent Hyg Sci 12: 666-674, 2012.
  12. Moon SJ, Ka KH, Ku IY, Kim EH: The research on job stress, self-efficacy, and organizational commitment by the job characteristics of dental hygienists in rural areas. J Korean Isl 29: 147-170,
  13. Sung SH, Min HJ: A study on the concept of good jobs recognized by new workers. JEC 10: 49-70, 2020. https://doi.org/10.35273/jec.2020.10.3.003
  14. Kim BS, Kim MH, Hwang MY: The study on the status of Seoul's decent job and future policy perspectives. The Seoul Institute, Seoul, pp.1-223, 2014.
  15. Park JG, Heo CM: The effect of good quality job factors on innovation behavior of employees: focused on the mediating effect of work・growth balance. KMCR 22: 265-277, 2022.
  16. Kim ES, Jung CY: The role of general characteristics and job satisfaction in voluntary turnover process. J Career Educ Res 23: 107-122, 2010.
  17. Chang WH: Analysis of the good job condition of which young people think and the impact of job search behavior on employment. J Pract Eng Educ 13: 351-368, 2021. https://doi.org/10.14702/JPEE.2021.351
  18. Oh EJ, Hwang SJ: Comparison of the working conditions of dental hygienists using data from online job sites. J Dent Hyg Sci 17: 501-507, 2017. https://doi.org/10.17135/jdhs.2017.17.6.501
  19. Choi JH, Choi JS: Effect of mediating variable on the relationship between job stress and stress response among clinical dental hygienists. J Dent Hyg Sci 14: 114-122, 2014.
  20. Kim GM, Lee JS, Kim HJ, Nam SH: Comparison of musculoskeletal disorders between pediatric dentists and general dentists. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent 48: 184-197, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2021.48.2.184
  21. Choi HJ, Jung JH, Joo GM: Influencing factors on turnover intention in clinical dental hygienist. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 18: 1057-1066,
  22. Kang HS, Jung YR, Cho YY: Survey on the working environment of national clinical dental hygienists. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 18: 863-878, 2018. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.20180074