Journal of Trauma and Injury

The Korean Society of Traumatology (대한외상학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Traumatic degloving injuries: a prospective study to assess injury patterns, management, and outcomes at a single center in northern India

  • Divij Jayant (Department of General Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER)) ;
  • Atul Parashar (Department of Plastic Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER)) ;
  • Ramesh Sharma (Department of Plastic Surgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER))
  • Received : 2023.05.05
  • Accepted : 2023.09.11
  • Published : 2023.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigated the epidemiology, management, outcomes, and postoperative disabilities of degloving soft tissue injuries (DSTIs) treated at a tertiary care center in northern India. Methods: A prospective study of patients with DSTIs was conducted over 15 months. The type of degloving injury, the mechanism of injury, and any associated injuries were analyzed using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 along with the management, outcomes, and disabilities at a 3-month follow-up. Results: Among 75 patients with DSTIs, the average age was 27.5 years, 80.0% were male, and 76.0% had been injured in traffic accidents. The majority (93.3%) were open degloving injuries. Lower limbs were affected most often (62.7%), followed by upper limbs (32.0%). Fractures were the most commonly associated injuries (72.0%). Most patients required more than two procedures, including secondary debridement (41.3%), split skin grafting (80.0%), flap coverage (12.0%), or vacuum-assisted closure (24.0%), while five patients underwent conservative management for closed degloving injuries. Postoperative complications included surgical site infections (14.7%) and skin necrosis (10.7%). Two patients died due to septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. The mean length of hospital stay was 11.5±8.1 days, with injuries affecting the lower limbs and perineum requiring longer hospital stays. The mean WHODAS 2.0 disability score at 3 months was 19. Most patients had mild disabilities. Time away from work depended largely upon the site and severity of the injury. Approximately 75% of patients resumed their previous job or study, 14% changed their job, and 8% stopped working completely due to residual disability. Conclusions: DSTIs are common injuries in trauma and management is challenging. Although open DSTI are clinically evident at secondary survey, closed degloving injuries may be missed in the primary survey, necessitating a high index of suspicion, thorough clinical examination, and protocol-based management. Primary preventive strategies (e.g., road safety protocols, preplacement training, and proper protective equipment in industries) are also needed to reduce the incidence of these injuries.

Keywords

References

  1. Krishnamoorthy R, Karthikeyan G. Degloving injuries of the hand. Indian J Plast Surg 2011;44:227-36. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.85344
  2. Antoniou D, Kyriakidis A, Zaharopoulos A, Moskoklaidis S. Degloving injury: report of two cases and review of the literature. Eur J Trauma 2005;31:593-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-005-1059-3
  3. Wojcicki P, Wojtkiewicz W, Drozdowski P. Severe lower extremities degloving injuries: medical problems and treatment results. Pol Przegl Chir 2011;83:276-82. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10035-011-0043-3
  4. Yan H, Gao W, Li Z, et al. The management of degloving injury of lower extremities: technical refinement and classification. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;74:604-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31827d5e00
  5. Latifi R, El-Hennawy H, El-Menyar A, et al. The therapeutic challenges of degloving soft-tissue injuries. J Emerg Trauma Shock 2014;7:228-32.
  6. Ustun TB, Kostanjsek N, Chatterji S, Rehm J, editors. Measuring health and disability: manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). World Health Organization; 2010.
  7. Khan M, Aziz A, Naz S, et al. Plastic surgical trauma: a single-centre experience. Indian J Plast Surg 2012;45:538-45. https://doi.org/10.4103/0970-0358.105970
  8. Hakim S, Ahmed K, El-Menyar A, et al. Patterns and management of degloving injuries: a single national level 1 trauma center experience. World J Emerg Surg 2016;11:35.
  9. Milcheski DA, Ferreira MC, Nakamoto HA, Tuma P, Gemperli R. Degloving injuries of lower extremity: proposal of a treatment protocol. Rev Col Bras Cir 2010;37:199-203. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69912010000300007
  10. Arnez ZM, Khan U, Tyler MP. Classification of soft-tissue degloving in limb trauma. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:1865-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2009.11.029
  11. Yan H, Gao W, Li Z, et al. The management of degloving injury of lower extremities: technical refinement and classification. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;74:604-10. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31827d5e00
  12. Tarun G, Ramu M. Prevention of industrial accidents: measures and challenges. Int J Pure Appl Math 2018;120:491-8.
  13. Mandel MA. The management of lower extremity degloving injuries. Ann Plast Surg 1981;6:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198101000-00001
  14. Bloomenstein RB. Viability prediction in pedicle flaps by infrared thermometry. Plast Reconstr Surg 1968;42:252-61. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-196809000-00011
  15. Eccles S, Handley B, Khan U, McFadyen I, Nanchahal J, Nayagam S, editors. Standards for the management of open fractures. Oxford University Press; 2020.
  16. Latifi R. The diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of degloving soft-tissue injuries. SOJ Surg 2013;1:01.
  17. Hak DJ, Olson SA, Matta JM. Diagnosis and management of closed internal degloving injuries associated with pelvic and acetabular fractures: the Morel-Lavallee lesion. J Trauma 1997;42:1046-51. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199706000-00010
  18. Sakai G, Suzuki T, Hishikawa T, Shirai Y, Kurozumi T, Shindo M. Primary reattachment of avulsed skin flaps with negative pressure wound therapy in degloving injuries of the lower extremity. Injury 2017;48:137-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2016.10.026
  19. Alet JM, Weigert R, Castede JC, Casoli V. Management of traumatic soft tissue defects with dermal regeneration template: a prospective study. Injury 2014;45:1042-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.11.034
  20. Meara JG, Guo L, Smith JD, Pribaz JJ, Breuing KH, Orgill DP. Vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of degloving injuries. Ann Plast Surg 1999;42:589-94. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199906000-00002
  21. Wong LK, Nesbit RD, Turner LA, Sargent LA. Management of a circumferential lower extremity degloving injury with the use of vacuum-assisted closure. South Med J 2006;99:628-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.smj.0000217111.35160.09
  22. Dini M, Quercioli F, Mori A, Romano GF, Lee AQ, Agostini T. Vacuum-assisted closure, dermal regeneration template and degloved cryopreserved skin as useful tools in subtotal degloving of the lower limb. Injury 2012;43:957-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.03.020
  23. Nickerson TP, Zielinski MD, Jenkins DH, Schiller HJ. The Mayo Clinic experience with Morel-Lavallee lesions: establishment of a practice management guideline. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;76:493-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000000111