Journal of Information Processing Systems

Korea Information Processing Society (한국정보처리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research on Economic Performance of Mining Enterprises Based on Stakeholders

  • Yunxiang Peng ( School of Finance and Economics, Guangdong University of Science and Technology) ;
  • Guixian Tian ( School of Business, Pingxiang University)
  • Received : 2022.11.22
  • Accepted : 2023.02.16
  • Published : 2023.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Conventional mining enterprises, particularly coal-related ones, exhibit substantial environmental pollution and high energy consumption, while those involved in new energy resources, such as lithium and cobalt, face severe resource shortages. Consequently, the economic efficiency of China's mining enterprises is significantly constrained. This study examines data from nine representative listed enterprises in China spanning 2016 to 2021. Employing the DEA model-i.e., BCC (VRS) model, we analyze the economic efficiency of mining enterprises with a focus on stakeholders. The paper provides static and dynamic analyses, offering insights and recommendations for enhancing technology, reducing costs, and fortifying social relationships.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper was funded by the Innovation and Strengthening School Quality Project in 2022 from Guangdong University of Science and Technology Project (No. GKY-2022CQTD-6, Research team on collaborative governance of urban agglomeration innovation network in Guangdong Hong Kong Aoda Bay Area).

References

  1. J. Guo, R. G. Cui, W. D. Yan, B. L. Lin, Z. J. Liu, and Q. Z. Zhou, "Outlook and overview of mineral resources situation of China in 2018," China Mining Magazine, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 8-14, 2019. https://doi.org/10.12075/j.issn.1004-4051.2019.01.023 
  2. B. Wang, "Analysis on the current situation and prospect of green mine construction in nonferrous metals industry," World Nonferrous Metals, vol. 2020, no. 23, pp. 163-164+167, 2020. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1002-5065.2020.23.082 
  3. Industrial Statistics, Department of the National Bureau of Statistics, The China Industrial Statistics Yearbook. Beijing, China: China Statistics Press, 2021. 
  4. Y. Chen, C. M. Yang, and Y. P. Wang, "On assessment of core competence of resource type enterprises," Metal Mine, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 17-21+35, 2007. 
  5. S. J. Huang, "Research on the impact of social responsibility of listed companies in nonferrous metals industry on financial performance," M. S. thesis, Jiangxi University of Technology, Nanchang, China, 2015. 
  6. Y. H. Chen, "Research on performance evaluation of W Mining Company based on performance prism method," M. S. thesis, Guangdong University of Finance and Economics, Guangzhou, China, 2019.
  7. J. Y. Ji, C. Wang, and Z. Yuan, "Research on the evaluation of corporate stakeholder relationship operating efficiency based on DEA model - based on an empirical analysis of listed companies in my country's home appliance industry," Industrial Technology and Economy, vol. 2010, no. 12, pp. 15-22, 2010. 
  8. C. H. Wang and J. Yuan, "Efficiency measurement and spatial difference analysis of modern circulation industry in the western region: based on the non-radial super-efficiency three-stage DEA model," Industrial Technology and Economy, vol. 2019, no. 12, pp. 102-110, 2019.
  9. X. Z. Song, X. Ma, and Z. M. Wang, "Research on the efficiency of social responsibility of listed coal companies in my country: 37 listed coal companies based on DEA model," Friends of Accounting, vol. 2013, no. 7, pp. 62-64, 2013. 
  10. S. Arvidsson and J. Dumay, "Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: where to now for environmental policy and practice?," Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1091-1110, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2937 
  11. G. Landi and M. Sciarelli, "Towards a more ethical market: the impact of ESG rating on corporate financial performance," Social Responsibility Journal, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 11-27, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2017-0254 
  12. F. Vitolla, N. Raimo, M. Rubino, and A. Garzoni, "How pressure from stakeholders affects integrated reporting quality," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1591-1606, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1850 
  13. A. J. Hillman and G. D. Keim, "Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 125-139, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H 
  14. J. Choi and H. Wang, "Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance," Strategic Management Journal, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 895-907, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.759 
  15. R. K. Bhaskaran, I. W. K. Ting, S. K. Sukumaran, and S. D. Sumod, "Environmental, social and governance initiatives and wealth creation for firms: an empirical examination," Managerial and Decision Economics, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 710-729, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3131 
  16. D. C. Broadstock, R. Matousek, M. Meyer, and N. G. Tzeremes, "Does corporate social responsibility impact firms' innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance," Journal of Business Research, vol. 119, pp. 99-110, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.014 
  17. A. McWilliams and D. Siegel, "Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective," Academy of Management Review, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 117-127, 2001.  https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4011987
  18. H. Leibenstein, "Allocative efficiency vs." X-efficiency"," The American Economic Review, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 392-415, 1966. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1823775