Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX (지적과 국토정보)

LX Spatial Information Research Institute (한국국토정보공사 공간정보연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Influence Factors of the Ratio of Assessment Value to Sale Price of Forest Land - Focused on the Sales Case of Forest Land in Gwangju, Gyeonggi-do -

임야가격의 현실화율 영향요인 연구 - 경기 광주의 임야 거래사례를 중심으로 -

  • Lee, Kyu-Tai (Dept. of Real Estate, Daegu Catholic University)
  • 이규태 (대구가톨릭대학교 부동산학과)
  • Received : 2023.10.02
  • Accepted : 2023.11.29
  • Published : 2023.12.10
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study empirically analyzed the determinants of the assessment ratio (hereinafter 'AR') based on a total of 2,129 sales cases of forests in Gwangju, Gyeonggi-do. The main findings of this study through multiple regression analysis are summarized as follows. First, this study shows that regional characteristics have significantly different effects on the AR of forest land prices. Specifically, there was a significant difference in the AR depending on the location of the parcel by sub-region and the ratio of residential area, and the higher the number of development plans in progress, the more likely the officially assessed land price will be formed close to the sale price. Second, this study analyzed that location characteristics such as the proximity of the inner and outer center of the jurisdiction and traffic accessibility had a significant influence on the determination of the AR. Third, this study identified significant differences in AR depending on detailed factors such as planning management areas, production management areas, conservation areas for mountain, conservation areas for nature, and restricted development areas as land use and regulatory characteristics of forest lands. Fourth, this study found that land characteristics are a significant factor influencing the AR as an individual factor in forest land.

본 연구는 경기 광주의 임야 총 2,129건의 거래사례를 바탕으로 현실화율의 영향요인을 규명하였다. 다중회귀분석을 통해 나타난 본 연구의 주요 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 본 연구는 지역특성이 임야가격의 현실화율에 유의적인 상이한 영향을 미친다는 것을 보여주고 있다. 구체적으로 대상 필지의 하위 행정구역상 위치, 택지지역 면적비율에 따라 현실화율에 유의적인 차이가 존재했으며, 진행 중인 개발사업 수가 많을수록 공시지가가 거래가격에 근접한 수준으로 형성될 가능성이 높게 나타났다. 둘째, 본 연구는 관내·외 중심지 인접성, 교통접근성 등의 입지특성이 현실화율 결정에 유의적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 셋째, 본 연구는 임야의 이용규제특성으로 용도지역상 관리지역, 보전산지, 자연보전권역, 개발제한구역 등의 법적·제도적 이용규제나 행위제한에 따라 현실화율에 유의적인 차이가 존재한다는 것을 확인하였다. 넷째, 본 연구는 임야의 개별적 요인인 토지특성이 현실화율에 유의적인 영향요인으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Gyeonggi Research Institute. 2020. A Study on the Quantitative Standard Improvement of Forest Land Conversion in Gyeonggi-do. 
  2. Koh SS, Jung JH. 2009. An Emprical Analysis on the Vertical Equity using the Sales Price in the Taxation of Land. Journal of the Korea Real Estate Analysts Association. 15(2):23-40. 
  3. Koo DH. 2006. The Ratio of Assessed Values to Market Values of Land. The Geographical Journal of Korea. 40(2):257-268. 
  4. MOLIT. 2019. Improving the Reliability of the Officially Assessed Real Estate Price in 2020. 
  5. MOLIT. 2020. Realization Plan for Officially Assessed Real Estate Price. 
  6. MOLIT. 2022. Realization Revision Plan for Officially Assessed Real Estate Price. 
  7. Kim NH, An SH, Lee KT. 2019. The Effects of Development Plan on Land Prices in Surrounding Areas: Focused on the Sales Price in Pyeongtaek. Review of Real Estate and Urban Studies. 11(2):87-104.  https://doi.org/10.22423/KREUS.2019.11.2.87
  8. Kim MY, Kim NH, Lee KT, Shin JC. 2020. A Study on the Price Determinants of Forest Land. Journal of The Residential Environment Institute of Korea. 18(1):35-48.  https://doi.org/10.22313/reik.2020.18.1.35
  9. Kim, SJ, Kwon KW. 2013. A Study on Determinant Factors for the Realization Rate of Publicly Notified Individual Land Price. Journal of the Korean Cadastre Information Association. 15(2):149-162. 
  10. Kim HJ, Yoo JY. 2018. Factors Affecting the Appropriateness of Forest Land Transaction Price and Officially Assessed Land Price in Six Districts in Southern and Northern Parts of Han River in Seoul. Korea Real Estate Review. 28(4):63-73.  https://doi.org/10.35136/krer.28.4.5
  11. Kim HJ, Jeon KA, Roh HC. 2017. Study on Factors for Assessment Ratio of Real Estate. Korean Journal of Taxation Research. 34(3):287-308. 
  12. Min WK. 2020. A Study on Determinants of Realization Rate of Publicly Notified Individual Land Price Using One-Way ANOVA: Focused on Case of Wansan-gu, Jeonju-si. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 50(1):87-105.
  13. Seo KK. 2022. Appraisal Theory. Kyoyookbook. 
  14. Ahn JK. 2005. The Assessment Ratio Study and Appraisal Performance in Mass Appraisal System. Journal of the Korea Real Estate Analysts Association. 11(1):1-16. 
  15. Oh YK. 2018. Spatio-temporal Analysis of Forest Change using Spatial Information: A Case Study of Heongseong and Wonju. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 48(2):21-30. 
  16. Won SH, Hwang CS. 2017. A Study on the Change of Urban Land Use According to the Change of Transportation Accessibility. Journal of Cadastre & Land InformatiX. 47(1):127-142. 
  17. Yoo SJ, Lee JH, Jung HM. 2014. Analysis on the Equity of Publicly Announced Individual Land Price by Comparing Sales Price. Journal of The Residential Environment Institute of Korea. 12(3):39-56. 
  18. Lee KT, Kim EJ, Seo KK, 2016. Analysis of Changes in Property Tax Based on the Equity of Assessment Ratio on the Officially Announced Multi-family Housing Price: Focused on Apartment House in Daegu. Korea Real Estate Academy Review. (66):31-45. 
  19. Lee KT, Bae SY, Lee SY, 2018. A Study on the Influence of Large Complex Shopping Mall Development on Neighboring Land Price. GRI REVIEW. 20(2):53-78. 
  20. Lee DY. 2013. A Study on Officially Announced Forest Land Price and Price Determinants [dissertation]. Daegu University. 
  21. Lee YB. 1998. A Study on the Price Determinants of Forest Land. Journal of the Korea Real Estate Analysts Association. 4:57-71. 
  22. Lee JG, Cho MH. 2016. Public Economics. Munwosa. 
  23. Lee HY, Kim JH. 2013. A Study on the Factors Affecting the Differences between Public Land Price and Market Price: Focused on Cheongdo-gun in Gyeongsangbuk-do. Korean Public Administration Quarterly. 25(4):1,145-1,159. 
  24. Cho JH. 2010. Principles of Real Estate. Konkuk University Press. 
  25. Ji JD. 2015. Understanding of Cadastre. Kimundang. 
  26. Hong WC, Suh ST. 2011. An Analysis of Reasonableness of Officially Announced Price of Real Estate Based on Real Transaction Prices: The Case of Gangdong-gu in Seoul. Korea Real Estate Review. 21(1):155-169. 
  27. Bell EJ. 1984. Administrative Inequity and Property Assessment: The Case for the Traditional Approach. Property Tax Journal. 3(2):123-131. 
  28. Cameron A, Trivedi P. 2022. Microeconometrics using Stata, Second Edition. Stata Press. 
  29. Cheng PL. 1974. Property Taxation Assessment Performance and Its Measurement. Public Finance. 29(3):268-284. 
  30. Clapp JM. 1990. A New Test for Equitable Real Estate Tax Assessment. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics. 3(3):233-249.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00216188
  31. IAAO. 1978. Improving Real Property Assessment: A Reference Manual. The Association Research and Education Association. 
  32. Kochin LA, Parks RW. 1982. Vertical Equity in Real Estate Assessment: A Fair Appraisal. Economic Inquiry. 20:511-531. 
  33. Paglin M, Fogarty M. 1972. Equity and the Property Tax: A New Conceptual Focus. National Tax Journal. 25(4):557-565.  https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41791839
  34. Sunderman MA, Birch JW, Cannaday RE, Hamilton TW. 1990. Testing for Vertical Inequity in Property Tax Systems. Journal of Real Estate Research. 5(3):319-334.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10835547.1990.12090625
  35. Gwangju City Hall. 2023. [Internet]. [www.gjcity.go.kr]. Last accessed 10 March 
  36. Google Earth. 2022. [Internet]. [earth.google.com/web]. Last accessed 6 October 2022. 
  37. National Law Information Service. 2023. [Internet]. [www.law.go.kr]. Last accessed 15 March 
  38. Real Estate Statistics Information System. 2023. [Internet]. [www.reb.or.kr/r-one]. Last accessed 30 August 
  39. Industrial Land Information System. 2022. [Internet]. [www.industryland.or.kr]. Last accessed 5 October 2022. 
  40. Forest Land Information System. 2023. [Internet]. [www.forest.go.kr]. Last accessed 1 March 
  41. Transaction Price Open System. 2022. [Internet]. [rt.molit.go.kr]. Last accessed 1 October 2022. 
  42. Forest Information Service System. 2022. [Internet]. [gis.kofpi.or.kr]. Last accessed 5 October 2022. 
  43. Land Use Regulation Information System. 2023. [Internet]. [www.eum.go.kr]. Last accessed 15 March 2023.