Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia

World Association for Triple Helix and Future Strategy Studies (세계트리플헬릭스미래전략학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Rumors that Move People to Action: A Case of the 2019 Hong Kong Protests

  • Kwon, K. Hazel (Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication from Arizona State University)
  • Published : 2022.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A good story persuades people to act. The mobilizing power of a story, however, does not necessarily rely on informational fidelity. During political unrests, word-of-mouth can intermix facts with unverified claims and emotional outrage, often transforming reality into convincing rumor stories. This rapid communication article discusses how rumor publics (dis)approve and participate in 2019 Hong Kong Protests. This survey study finds that police injustice and brutality were the predominant themes of the collected rumor stories, although some stories contained mixed views or anti-protest claims. Rumors of police injustice and brutality were associated with less negative attitudes toward the protests, especially when respondents believed the story. The relationship between rumor stories and protest participation was less obvious, except for rumors about an individual protester's whereabout. This study discusses the ways in which rumor is embedded in contentious political processes.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research has been funded by the National Science Foundation (Grant Award Number 2027387).

References

  1. Aguirre, B. E., Wenger, D., & Vigo, G. (1998). A test of the emergent norm theory of collective behavior. Sociological Forum, 13 (2), 301-320 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022145900928
  2. Bordia, P., & Rosnow, R. L. (1998). Rumor rest stops on the information highway transmission patterns in a computer-mediated rumor chain. Human Communication Research, 25 (2), 163-179. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1998.tb00441.x
  3. Bail, C. A. (2016). Combining natural language processing and network analysis to examine how advocacy organizations stimulate conversation on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 11823-11828. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607151113
  4. Bernardi, D. L., Cheong, P. H., Lundry, C., & Ruston, S. W. (2012). Narrative landmines: Rumors, Islamist extremism, and the struggle for strategic influence. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
  5. Chen, H. T., Guo, L., & Su, C. C. (2020). Network agenda setting, partisan selective exposure, and opinion repertoire: The effects of pro-and counter-attitudinal media in Hong Kong. Journal of Communication, 70 (1), 35-59. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz042
  6. Einwiller, S. A., & Kamins, M. A. (2008). Rumor has it: The moderating effect of identification on rumor impact and the effectiveness of rumor refutation 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38 (9), 2248-2272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00390.x
  7. Fine, A. G. (2013). Rumor in collective behavior and social movements. In Snow, D.A., della Porta, D., Klandermans, B., & McAdam, D. (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of social and political movements (pp. 1-3). Hoboken: Blackwell Publishing. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm485
  8. Kwon, K. H., Bang, C. C., Egnoto, M., & Raghav Rao, H. (2016). Social media rumors as improvised public opinion: semantic network analyses of twitter discourses during Korean saber rattling 2013. Asian Journal of Communication, 26 (3), 201-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2015.1130157
  9. Kwon, K. H. & Rao, R. (2017). Cyber-rumor sharing under a homeland security threat in the context of government internet surveillance: The case of South-North Korea conflict. Government Information Quarterly, 34 (2), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.04.002
  10. Lee, F. L., & Chan, J. M. (2016). Digital media activities and mode of participation in a protest campaign: A study of the Umbrella Movement. Information, Communication & Society, 19 (1), 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1093530
  11. Liu, J. (2017). Rumors and Mobile Phones: Participation and Resistance in Contemporary China. Participations, 17, 59-90. https://doi.org/10.3917/parti.017.0059
  12. Margolin, D. B., Hannak, A., & Weber, I. (2018). Political fact-checking on Twitter: When do corrections have an effect? Political Communication, 35 (2), 196-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334018
  13. Oh, O., Agrawal, M., Agrawal, M., & Rao, H. R. (2013). Community intelligence and social media services: A rumor theoretic analysis of Tweets during social crises. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 37 (2), 407-426. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2013/37.2.05
  14. Peterson, W. A., & Gist, N. P. (1951). Rumor and public opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 57 (2), 159-167. https://doi.org/10.1086/220916
  15. Pezzo, M. V., & Beckstead, J. W. (2006). A multilevel analysis of rumor transmission: Effects of anxiety and belief in two field experiments. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28 (1), 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2801_8
  16. Public Opinion Programme (2019). People's confidence in "One Country, Two Systems." Retrieved from https://www.hkupop.hku.hk/english/popexpress/trust/conocts/ index.html.
  17. Ruths, D. (2019). The misinformation machine. Science, 363 (6425), 348
  18. Shibutani, T. (1966). Improvised news: A sociological study of rumor. Indianapolis: The BobbsMerrill Company.
  19. Sunstein, C. R. (2009). On rumors: How falsehoods spread, why we believe them, what can be done. New York: Penguin Press.
  20. Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. M. (1987). Collective behavior (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Prentice-Hall.