Journal of Public Diplomacy

The Korean Association for Public Diplomacy (한국공공외교학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Debating Feminist Foreign Policy: The Formation of (Unintended) Publics in Sweden's Public Diplomacy

  • Isabelle Karlsson (Lunds Universitet)
  • Received : 2022.07.11
  • Accepted : 2022.11.08
  • Published : 2022.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Investigating how publics form, this study aims to develop an understanding of how publics of Sweden's feminist foreign policy are constructed in public diplomacy discourse. To this end, the study conceptualizes publics as forming around perceptions of foreign policy that are mediated through public diplomacy events. Based on a debate on Sweden's feminist foreign policy on the digital platform Reddit, the research suggests three features of publics that become visible in the formation process. These are 1) relationality, 2) performance of meaning, and 3) temporariness in the form of shifting views. The study thus argues that the formation of publics in public diplomacy is highly context-dependent, and that also "unintended" publics are important for the enactment of public diplomacy. The study contributes to a practice focused and more inclusive approach to publics in public diplomacy.

Keywords

References

  1. Aggestam, K., & Bergman-Rosamond, A. (2016). Swedish Feminist Foreign Policy in the Making: Ethics, Politics, and Gender. Ethics & International Affairs, 30(3), 323-334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679416000241
  2. Aggestam, K., Rosamond, A. B., & Hedling, E. (2021). Feminist digital diplomacy and foreign policy change in Sweden. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00225-3
  3. Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Relations, 53, 1125-1149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700539002
  4. Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2011). Qualitative Research and Theory Development: Mystery As Method. Sage.
  5. Arvidsson, A., & Caliandro, A. (2016). Brand Public. Journal of Consumer Research, 42(5), 727-748. https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv053
  6. Asen, R. (2000). Seeking the "counter" in counterpublics. Communication Theory, 10(4), 424-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00201.x
  7. Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the Self : Gender, Community and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. Polity Press.
  8. Bjola, C., Cassidy, J. A., & Manor, I. (2020). Digital Public Diplomacy. Business as Usual or a Paradigm Shift? In N. Snow & N. J. Cull (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy (2 ed., pp. 405-412). Routledge.
  9. Bossetta, M., Dutceac Segesten, A., & Trenz, H.-J. (2017). Engaging with European Politics Through Twitter and Facebook: Participation Beyond the National? In M. Barisione & A. Michailidou (Eds.), Social Media and European Politics: Rethinking Power and Legitimacy in the Digital Era (pp. 53-76). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  10. Brunsson, N. (1993). Ideas and actions: Justification and hypocrisy as alternatives to control. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(6), 489-506. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90001-M
  11. Cohen, J. E. (2016). Presidential Attention Focusing in the Global Arena: The Impact of International Travel on Foreign Publics. Presidential Studies Quarterly, 46(1), 30-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/psq.12250
  12. Cortes, J. J., & Jamieson, T. (2020). Incorporating research design in public diplomacy: The role of listening to foreign publics. International Journal of Communication, 14, 1214-1231.
  13. Davies, S. E., & True, J. (2017). Norm Entrepreneurship in Foreign Policy: William Hague and the Prevention of Sexual Violence in Conflict. Foreign Policy Analysis, 13(3), 701-721. https://doi.org//10.1093/fpa/orw065
  14. di Martino, L. (2020). The Spectrum of Listening. In N. Snow & N. J. Cull (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy (2 ed., pp. 21-29). Routledge.
  15. Di Martino, L., Tam, L., & Varpahovskis, E. (2022, April). As Trust in Social Media Crumbles, Are These Platforms Still Adequate for Public Diplomacy? https://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/blog/trust-social-media-crumbles-are-these-platforms still-adequate-public-diplomacy
  16. Dolea, A. (2018). Public diplomacy as co-constructed discourses of engagement. In K. A. Johnston & M. Taylor (Eds.), The Handbook of Communication Engagement (pp. 331- 345). Wiley Blackwell.
  17. Duncombe, C. (2019). Digital Diplomacy: Emotion and Identity in the Public Realm. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14(1-2), 102-116. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X 14101016
  18. Erlandsen, M. (2021). Book Review of Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy (2nd Edition), edited by Nancy Snow and Nicholas J. Cull, Routledge, 2020. Journal of Public Diplomacy, 1(1), 114-116. https://doi.org/10.23045/jpd.2021.1.1.114
  19. Fitzpatrick, K. R. (2012). Defining Strategic Publics in a Networked World: Public Diplomacy's Challenge at Home and Abroad. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 7(4), 421-440. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341236
  20. Given, L. M. (2008). In Vivo Coding. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods.
  21. Goldsmith, B. E., Horiuchi, Y., & Matush, K. (2021). Does Public Diplomacy Sway Foreign Public Opinion? Identifying the Effect of High-Level Visits. American Political Science Review, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000393
  22. Grunig, J. E., & Kim, J.-N. (2017). Publics approaches to health and risk message design and processing. In R.L. Parrott. (Ed.). Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.322
  23. Guimaraes, A., Balalau, O., Terolli, E., & Weikum, G. (2019). Analyzing the Traits and Anomalies of Political Discussions on Reddit. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 13(01), 205-213. https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/ICWSM/article/view/3222
  24. Ingenhoff, D., Calamai, G., & Sevin, E. (2021). Key Influencers in Public Diplomacy 2.0: A Country-Based Social Network Analysis. Social Media + Society, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120981053
  25. Jackson, S. J., & Foucault Welles, B. (2015). Hijacking #myNYPD: Social Media Dissent and Networked Counterpublics. Journal of Communication, 65, 932-952. https://doi.org//10.1111/jcom.12185
  26. Jacoby, S., & Ochs, E. (1995). Co-Construction: An Introduction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(3), 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi2803_1
  27. Jasser, J., Garibay, I., Scheinert, S., & Mantzaris, A. V. (2021). Controversial information spreads faster and further in Reddit [Pre-print]. Journal of Computational Social Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-021-00121-z
  28. Jones, R. (2002). Challenges to the notion of publics in public relations: implications of the risk society for the discipline. Public Relations Review, 28(1), 49-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(02)00110-8
  29. Kaiser, J. (2017). Public spheres of skepticism: Climate skeptics' online comments in the German networked public sphere. International Journal of Communication, 11, 1661-1682.
  30. Kampf, R., Manor, I., & Segev, E. (2015). Digital Diplomacy 2.0? A Cross-national Comparison of Public Engagement in Facebook and Twitter. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 10(4), 331-362. https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-12341318
  31. Kaneva, N. (2014). Critical Reflections on Nation Branding as Discourse and Practice. In A. N. Samaras (Ed.), Images of Nations: Strategic Communication, Soft Power and the Media (pp. 61-75). Kastaniotis.
  32. Kaneva, N., & Cassinger, C. (2022). Centering gender in public diplomacy and nation branding: an invitation to reimagine the future of the field. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-022-00265-3
  33. Karlsson, I. (2021). "We try to be nuanced everywhere all the time": Sweden's feminist foreign policy and discursive closure in public diplomacy. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00245-z
  34. Lee, K. S., & Ingenhoff, D. (2020). Cultural mediation in international exchange programs: personalization, translation, and coproduction in exchange participant blogs. International Journal of Communication, 14(21), 4343-4363
  35. Loehwing, M., & Motter, J. (2009). Publics, Counterpublics, and the Promise of Democracy. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 42(3), 220-241. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25655356
  36. Manor, I., Jimenez-Martinez, C., & Dolea, A. (2021, January 27). Blog Post | An asset or a hassle? The public as a problem for public diplomats. https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/hjd/news/2021/blog-post---an-asset-or-a-hassle-the-public-as-a-problem-for-public-diplomats https://www.universiteitleiden.nl/hjd/news/2021/blog-post---an-asset-or-a-hassle-the-public-as-a-problem-for-public-diplomats
  37. Manor, I., & Pamment, J. (2019). Towards prestige mobility? Diplomatic prestige and digital diplomacy. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(2), 93-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1577801
  38. Melissen, J. (2005). The New Public Diplomacy: Between Theory and Practice. In J. Melissen (Ed.), The New Public Diplomacy. Soft Power in International Relations (pp. 3-27). Palgrave MacMillan.
  39. Melissen, J. (2013). Public Diplomacy. In A. F. Cooper, J. Heine, & R. Thakur (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Diplomacy (pp. 436-452). Oxford University Press.
  40. Miskimmon, A., O'Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2013). Strategic Narratives. Communication Power and the New World Order. Routledge.
  41. Pacher, A. (2018). Strategic Publics in Public Diplomacy: A Typology and a Heuristic Device for Multiple Publics. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 13, 272-296. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.1163/1871191X-13020004
  42. Pamment, J. (2012). What became of the new public diplomacy? Recent developments in British, US and Swedish public diplomacy policy and evaluation methods. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 7(3), 313-336. https://doi.org/10.1163/187119112X635177
  43. Pamment, J. (2013). New Public Diplomacy in the 21st Century: A Comparative Study of Policy and Practice. Routledge.
  44. Pamment, J. (2021). Does Public Diplomacy Need a Theory of Disruption? The Role of Nonstate Actors in Counter-branding the Swedish COVID-19 Response. Journal of Public Diplomacy, 1(1), 80-110. https://doi.org/10.23045/jpd.2021.1.1.080
  45. Pamment, J., & Cassinger, C. (2018). Nation branding and the social imaginary of participation: An exploratory study of the Swedish Number campaign. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 21(5), 561-574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417751152
  46. Perez, L. A., Chon, M.-G., Vibber, K., & Kim, J.-N. (2021). Classifying foreign publics: Examining the relationships behavioral experience, symbolic environment, and communication behaviors among key foreign publics. Politics & Policy, 49(6), 1308-1322. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12439
  47. Proferes, N., Jones, N., Gilbert, S., Fiesler, C., & Zimmer, M. (2021). Studying Reddit: A Systematic Overview of Disciplines, Approaches, Methods, and Ethics. Social Media + Society, 7(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211019004
  48. Rosen Sundstrom, M., & Elgstrom, O. (2019). Praise or critique? Sweden's feminist foreign policy in the eyes of its fellow EU members. European Politics and Society, 21(4), 418-433. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2019.1661940
  49. Rosen Sundstrom, M., Zhukova, E., & Elgstrom, O. (2021). Spreading a norm-based policy? Sweden's Feminist Foreign Policy in international media. Contemporary Politics, 27(4), 439-460. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2021.1902629
  50. Tago, A. (2017). Public Diplomacy and Foreign Policy. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
  51. Tam, L., & Kim, J.-N. (2019). Who are publics in public diplomacy? Proposing a taxonomy of foreign publics as an intersection between symbolic environment and behavioral experiences. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 15(1), 28-37. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-018-0104-z
  52. Wang, J. (2006). Managing national reputation and international relations in the global era: Public diplomacy revisited. Public Relations Review, 32(2), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2005.12.001
  53. Wang, J., & Chang, T.-K. (2004). Strategic public diplomacy and local press: how a high profile "head-of-state" visit was covered in America's heartland. Public Relations Review, 30(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2003.11.002
  54. Warner, M. (2002). Publics and counterpublics. Zone Books.
  55. Youmans, W. L., & Powers, S. (2012). Remote Negotiations: International Broadcasting as Bargaining in the Information Age. International Journal of Communication, 6, 2149-2172.
  56. Zaharna, R.S. (2004). Asymmetry of cultural styles and the unintended consequences of crisis public diplomacy. In H. Slavik (Ed.), Intercultural communication and diplomacy (pp. 133-142). Diplo Foundation.
  57. Zaharna, R. S. (2016). Reassessing "whose story wins:" The trajectory of identity resilience in narrative contests. International Journal of Communication, 10, 4407-4438.
  58. Zaharna, R. S. (2018). Global engagement culture and communication insights from public diplomacy. In K. A. Johnston & M. Taylor (Eds.), The Handbook of Communication Engagement (pp. 313-330). Wiley Blackwell.
  59. Zaharna, R. S. (2021). A Humanity-Centered Vision of Soft Power for Public Diplomacy's Global Mandate. Journal of Public Diplomacy, 1(2), 27-48. https://doi.org/10.23045/jpd.2021.1.2.027
  60. Zaharna, R. S., Fisher, A., & Arsenault, A. (2013). Introduction: The Connective Mindshift. In R. S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault, & A. Fisher (Eds.), Relational, networked, and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy: The connective mindshift (pp. 1-14).
  61. Dictionary.com. (n.d.). Walk of shame. Retrieved from: https://www.dictionary.com/browse/walk-of-shame
  62. Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Misogyny. Retrieved from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/misogyny
  63. Dictionary, U. (n.d.). Walk of Shame. Retrieved from: https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Walk%20of%20Shame
  64. Asplid, A., & Jakobson, H. (2017). Efter slojkritiken: Traffas inte i Iran. Expressen. https://www.expressen.se/nyheter/efter-slojkritiken-traffas-inte-i-iran/
  65. Skoglund, K. (2020). Ann Linde om relationen med Kina: "Problematiskt". Expressen. https://www.expressen.se/nyheter/ann-linde-om-relationen-med-kina-problematiskt/
  66. Sveriges Radio. (2017). Sweden accused of double standards after minister wears headscarf in Iran. Sveriges Radio (Sweden's Radio). https://sverigesradio.se/artikel/6629515
  67. SVT. (2017, 13 February 2017). Linde svarade pa slojbraket: "Jag vill inte bryta mot lagen". SVT (Sweden's television). https://www.svt.se/nyheter/inrikes/linde-svarade-pa slojbraket
  68. Taylor, A. (2017). Sweden's 'feminist' government criticized for wearing headscarves in Iran. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2017/02/13/swedens-feminist government-criticized-for-wearing-headscarves-in-iran/
  69. Ministry for Foreign Affairs. (2019). The Swedish Foreign Service action plan for feminist foreign policy 2019-2022, including direction and measures for 2020.
  70. UN Watch. (2017). Walk of Shame: Sweden's "first feminist government in the world" don Hijabs for Iran's President Rouhani. UN Watch. https://unwatch.org/issue-622-swedens-hijabs-iran/
  71. Clement, J. (2022). Regional distribution of desktop traffic to Reddit.com as of May 2022 by country.https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-socialnet-works ranked-by-number-of-users/
  72. Dixon, S. (2022). Most popular social networks worldwide as of January 2022, ranked by number of monthly active users. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-socialnetworks ranked-by-number-of-users/