DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Investigation for the Efficiency in Flexural Design of CFRP Bar-Reinforced Concrete Slab

CFRP 보강근 보강 콘크리트 슬래브 휨설계의 효율성에 관한 연구

  • 강수태 (대구대학교 건설시스템공학과) ;
  • 양은익 (강릉원주대학교 토목공학과) ;
  • 최명성 (단국대학교 토목환경공학과)
  • Received : 2022.08.01
  • Accepted : 2022.08.29
  • Published : 2022.08.30

Abstract

In this study, for one-way concrete slabs, the flexural strength, deflection, and crack width according to the amount of reinforcing bars were compared for the cases of using steel reinforcing bars and CFRP reinforcing bars. Critical performance dominating the flexural design was investigated and how to design the CFRP-reinforced concrete slab with efficiency was also discussed. It was found that CFRP-reinforced concrete slabs could achieve greater design flexural strength with the same amount of reinforcing bars compared to those using steel rebar, while deflection and crack width were relatively much larger. In concrete slabs using CFRP reinforcing bars, it was confirmed that the maximum crack width acts as a dominant factor in the design. For more efficient flexural design, it is necessary to mitigate the allowable crack width to 0.7 mm and to apply smaller diameter reinforcing bars to control the crack width.

이 연구에서는 일방향 콘크리트 슬래브를 대상으로 하여, 철근을 사용한 경우와 CFRP 보강근을 사용한 경우에 대해 보강근 사용량에 따른 휨강도와 처짐 및 균열폭을 비교하여 평가하였으며, CFRP 보강근 콘크리트 슬래브의 휨설계의 지배적인 성능과 효율적인 휨설계 방안에 대해 검토하였다. CFRP 보강근을 사용한 콘크리트 슬래브는 철근을 사용한 경우에 비해 동일한 보강근량에서 더 큰 설계휨강도를 얻을 수 있는 반면, 처짐 및 균열폭은 상대적으로 훨씬 크게 발생한다. CFRP 보강근을 사용한 콘크리트 슬래브에서는 최대균열폭이 설계의 지배적인 요인으로 작용하는 것으로 확인하였으며, 효율적 휨설계를 위해서는 허용균열폭을 0.7 mm로 완화하여 적용할 필요가 있으며, 작은 직경의 보강근 적용을 검토할 필요가 있음을 제시하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 국토교통부/국토교통과학기술진흥원의 지원으로 수행되었음(과제번호 21CFRP-C163392-01).

References

  1. Angst, U. M., Hooton, R. D., Marchand, J., Page, C. L., Flatt, R. J., Elsener, B., Gehlen, C., and Culikers, J. (2012), Present and Future Durability Challengers for Reinforced Concrete Structures, Materials and Corrosion, 63(12), 1047-1051. https://doi.org/10.1002/maco.201206898
  2. Han, M. S., Park, J. H., Lee, J. H., and Min, J. Y. (2021), Analysis of structural safety for rebar exposure and corrosion in PSC I-girder bridge slab, Journal of the Korea Institute of Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 25(1), 67-74. https://doi.org/10.11112/JKSMI.2021.25.1.67
  3. Oh, K. S., Park, K. T., and Kwon, S. J. (2016), Evaluation of Anti-Corrosion Performance of FRP Hybrid Bar with Notch in GGBFS Concrete, Journal of the Korea Institute of Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 20(4), 51-58. https://doi.org/10.11112/JKSMI.2016.20.4.051
  4. Stefanoni, M., Angst, U., and Elsener, B. (2018), Corrosion rate of carbon steel in carbonated concrete - A critical review, Cement and Concrete Research, 103, 35-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.10.007
  5. Woo, S. K. and Lee, Y. (2014), Probabilistic Estimation of Service Life of Box Culvert for Power Transmission Considering Carbonation and Crack Effect, Journal of the Korea Institute of Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 18(6), 30-40. https://doi.org/10.11112/JKSMI.2014.18.6.030
  6. Abbas, M. and Shafiee, M. (2020), An Overview of Maintenance Management Strategies for Corroded Steel Structures in Extreme Marine Environments, Marine Structures, 71, 102718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marstruc.2020.102718
  7. Nanni, A., De Luca, A., and Zadeh, H. J. (2014) Reinforced Concrete with FRP Bars: Mechanics and Design, CRS Press, FL, USA, 35-63.
  8. ACI Committee 440 (2015), Guide for the Design and Construction of Structural Concrete Reinforced with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer(FRP) Bars (ACI 440.1R-15), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI., USA.
  9. Barris, C., Torres, L., Vilanova, I., Mias, C., and Llorens, M. (2017), Experimental study on crack width and crack spacing for Glass-FRP reinforced concrete beams, Engineering Structures, 131, 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.007
  10. Cho, J. R., Park, Y. H., Park, S. Y., Cho, K. H., and Kim, S. T. (2015), Governing Design Factors of GFRP-Reinforced Concrete Bridge Deck, Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, 30(6), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2015.30.6.70
  11. KCI(Korea Concrete Institute), Design Guideline of FRP-Reinforced Concrete Structure (KCI-M-19-001), Korea Concrete Institute, Korea.
  12. MOLIT(Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport) (2022), KDS 14 20 20: Design Standard for Flexure and Axial Load, MOLIT, Korea.
  13. MOLIT(Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport) (2021), KDS 14 20 30: Design Standard for Serviceability of Concrete Structure, MOLIT, Korea.
  14. Frosch, R. J. (1999), Another Look at Cracking and Crack Control in Reinforced Concrete, ACI Structural Journal, 96(3), 437-442.
  15. ACI Committee 318 (2019), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (ACI 318-19), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA.
  16. Min, C. S. (2012), Crack Control in Beams and One-Way Slabs, Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 24(4), 381-390. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2012.24.4.381
  17. CSA(Canadian Standards Association) (2014), Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (CAN/CSA-S6-14), CSA Group, ON, Canada.
  18. Gergely, P. (1981), Role of Cover and Bar Spacing in Reinforced Concrete, Significant Developments in Engineering Practise and Research: A Tribute to Chester P. Siess, SP-75, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 133-147.
  19. Darwin, D., Hognestad, E., Beeby, A., and Rice, P. (1985), Debate: Crack Width, Cover, and Corrosion, Concrete International, 8(5), 20-35.
  20. Oesterle, R. G. (1997), The Role of Concrete Cover in Crack Control Criteria and Corrosion Protection, PCA R&D Serial No. 2054, Portland Cement Association, IL, USA.
  21. AASHTO(American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) (2009), AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Guide Specifications for GFRP-Reinforced Concrete Bridge Decks and Traffic Railings, DC, USA.
  22. JSCE(Japan Society of Civil Engineers) (1997), Recommendation for Design and Construction of Concrete Structures Using Continuous Fiber Reinforcing Materials, Concrete Engineering Series No. 23, Japan, 325.