Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집)

Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection (한국구조물진단유지관리공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Study on Seismic Performance of Masonry Wall Strengthened by FRP Sheet or Steel-Bar Truss System

FRP 시트 및 강봉 트러스 시스템으로 보강된 조적벽의 내진성능 비교 연구

  • 이혜지 (경기대학교 일반대학원 건축공학과) ;
  • 김상희 (경기대학교 건축공학과) ;
  • 양근혁 (경기대학교 건축공학과)
  • Received : 2022.05.06
  • Accepted : 2022.07.04
  • Published : 2022.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, the in-plane and out-of-plane seismic performance of the masonry wall strengthened using the steel bar truss system proposed by Hwang et al. (2021a, 2021b) or using FRP sheets were compared and evaluated. The maximum strength of the masonry wall reinforced with FRP sheets for the in-plane and out-of-plane loading was 71% and 85%, respectively, of that of the non-reinforced masonry wall. Meanwhile, the maximum strength of the masonry wall reinforced with the steel bar truss system was approximately 1.8 times higher than that of the non-reinforced masonry wall. Compared with the FRP sheet method, the steel bar truss system was excellent at improving the maximum load capacity, rigidity, and energy dissipation capacity. However, in the case of a masonry wall reinforced with FRP sheets, the masonry wall was overstrengthened with the FRP sheets covering the entire masonry wall, and it is considered that the overstrengthened specimen experienced sliding failure, resulting in a lower strength than the other specimens. A follow-up study is needed to compare the seismic performance of the specimen involving only a part of the masonry wall reinforced with the FRP sheets and the specimen reinforced using the steel bar truss system.

이 연구에서는 Hwang et al.(2021a, 2021b)가 제시한 강봉 트러스 시스템과 FRP 시트로 보강된 조적벽체의 면내·외 내진성능을 비교평가하였다. 면내·외 가력에서 FRP 시트로 보강된 조적벽체의 최대 내력은 각각 무보강 조적벽체의 71% 및 85% 수준으로 순수 조적벽체의 내력을 발휘하지 못하고 더 낮은 내진 성능을 보였다. 강봉 트러스 시스템으로 보강된 조적벽체의 최대 내력은 무보강 조적벽체에 비해 약 1.8배 높았다. 강봉 트러스 시스템은 FRP 시트 부착 공법에 비해 최대 내력, 강성, 에너지 소산능력 향상에 뛰어났다. 하지만, FRP 시트로 보강된 조적벽체의 경우, FRP시트를 조적벽체의 전체에 보강함으로써 조적벽체가 과보강되었고, 실험체가 미끄러짐 파괴가 발생 강성발현 증가효과가 미미한 것으로 판단된다. 추후, FRP 시트를 조적벽체의 일부분만 보강한 실험체와 강봉 트러스 시스템으로 보강한 실험체의 내진성능을 비교하는 후속연구가 필요하다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 연구는 국토부의 재원으로 국토교통과학기술진흥원(22TBIP-C155839-03) 및 2022년 경기대학교 대학원 연구원 장학생 장학금지원에 의하여 수행되었음.

References

  1. Agnihotri, P., Singhal, V., and Durgesh C. R. (2013), Effect of In-plane Damage on Out-of-plane Strength of Unreinforced Masonry Walls, Engineering Structures, 57, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.09.004
  2. ASTM C 1314 (2007), Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Masonry Prisms, ASTM International, Philadelphia, USA.
  3. ASTM E 519. (2003), Standard Test Method for Diagonal Tension(Shear) in Masonry Assemblages, ASTM International, Philadelphia, USA.
  4. Bae, B. I., Yun, H. J., Choi, C. S., and Choi, H. K. (2012), Evaluation of Shear Strength of Unreinforced Masonry Walls Retrofitted by Fiber Reinforced Polymer Sheet, Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 24(3), 305-313. (In Korean). https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2012.24.3.305
  5. Hwang, S. H., Yang, K. H., and Kim, S. (2021a), Evaluation on Seismic Performance of Masonry Walls Strengthened with Unbonded Steel-Bar Truss Systems, Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute, 33(2), 117-124. (In Korean). https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2021.33.2.117
  6. Hwang, S. H., Yang, K. H., and Kim, S. (2021b), In-plane and Out-of-plane Seismic Performances of Masonry Walls Strengthened with Steel-Bar Truss Systems, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 25(1), 16-24. (In Korean). https://doi.org/10.11112/JKSMI.2021.25.1.16
  7. KS F 2438. (2017), Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson's Ratio in Compression of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens, KSA, Seoul, Korea. (In Korean).
  8. KS F 4004. (2013), Concrete Bricks, KSA, Seoul, Korea. (In Korean).
  9. Lee, J. H. (2005), Seismic Capacity and Seismic Retrofitting of Low Rise Buildings Unreinforced Masonry, Brick-infilled RC Frame and Steel Slit Damper Retrofitted RC Frame. Ph.D. Thesis. Kwangwoon University. (In Korean).
  10. MOLIT. (2020), Number of Non-Reinforced Masonry Buildings Nationwide. Sejong, Korea: Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport. Available at: https://blcm.go.kr/stat/customizedStatic/Customized StaticSupplyList.do
  11. NIDP. (2009), Study on Seismic Retrofitting Techniques for Unreinforced Masonry Buildings, National Emergency Management Agency, Seoul, Korea. (In Korean).