한국환경복원기술학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)

  • 제25권5호
  • /
  • Pages.15-27
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1229-3032(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-5011(eISSN)
한국환경복원기술학회 (The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

환경공간정보와 InVEST Carbon 모형을 활용한 탄소저장량 추정 방법에 관한 연구: 세종시를 중심으로 - 생태·자연도, 국토환경성평가지도, 도시생태현황지도를 대상으로 -

A Study on the Estimation Method of Carbon Storage Using Environmental Spatial Information and InVEST Carbon Model: Focusing on Sejong Special Self-Governing City - Using Ecological and Natural Map, Environmental Conservation Value Assessment Map, and Urban Ecological Map -

  • 황진후 (고려대학교 오정리질리언스센터) ;
  • 장래익 (고려대학교 오정리질리언스센터) ;
  • 전성우 (고려대학교 환경생태공학부)
  • Hwang, Jin-Hoo (Ojeong Resilience Institute, Korea University) ;
  • Jang, Rae-ik (Ojeong Resilience Institute, Korea University) ;
  • Jeon, Seong-Woo (Division of Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University)
  • 투고 : 2022.08.24
  • 심사 : 2022.10.25
  • 발행 : 2022.10.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Climate change is considered a severe global problem closely related to carbon storage. However, recent urbanization and land-use changes reduce carbon stocks in terrestrial ecosystems. Recently, the role of protected areas has been emphasized as a countermeasure to the climate change, and protected areas allow the area to continue to serve as a carbon sink due to legal restrictions. This study attempted to expand the scope of these protected areas to an evaluation-based environmental spatial information theme map. In this study, the area of each grade was compared, and the distribution of land cover for each grade was analyzed using the Ecological and Nature Map, Environmental Conservation Value Assessment Map and Urban Ecological Map of Sejong Special Self-Governing City. Based on this, the average carbon storage for each grade was derived using the InVEST Carbon model. As a result of the analysis, the high-grade area of the environmental spatial information generally showed a wide area of the natural area represented by the forest area, and accordingly, the carbon storage amount was evaluated to be high. However, there are differences in the purpose of production, evaluation items, and evaluation methods between each environmental spatial information, there are differences in area, land cover, and carbon storage. Through this study, environmental spatial information based on the evaluation map can be used for land use management in the carbon aspect, and it is expected that a management plan for each grade suitable for the characteristics of each environmental spatial information is required.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 환경부에서 발주하여 2020년 고려대학교에서 수행한 "국토환경성평가지도 구축 및 시스템 개선(2020) - 환경공간정보 연계·활용 방안 연구"의 일부분을 발전시켰으며, 환경부의 재원으로 한국환경산업기술원의 ICT기반 환경영향평가 의사결정 지원 기술개발사업의 지원을 받아 연구되었습니다.(2020002990009)

참고문헌

  1. Campbell A.Dickson B.Gibbs H.Hansen M.Kapos V.Lysenko I.Miles L and Scharlemann J. 2009. The role of protected areas in storing carbon and reducing emissions. Iop Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 6(25): 1-2.
  2. Choi CH.Lim CH.Lee SJ and Seo HJ. 2019. The Impact of Anthropogenic Land Cover Change on Degradation of Grade in Ecology and Nature Map: Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 22(6): 77-87. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/KOSERT.2019.22.6.77
  3. Chung MG.Kang H and Choi SU. 2015. Assessment of Coastal Ecosystem Services for Conservation Strategies in South Korea. PLOS ONE 10(7): e0133856. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133856
  4. Dudley N and Philips A. 2006. Forests and protected areas : guidance on the use of the IUCN protected area management categories. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
  5. Foley JA.DeFries R.Asner GP.Barford C.Bonan G.Carpenter SR.Chapin FS.Coe MT.Daily GC.Gibbs HK.Helkowski JH.Holloway T.Howard EA.Kucharik CJ.Monfreda C.Patz JA.Prentice IC.Ramankutty N and Snyder PK. 2005. Globan Consequences of Land Use. Science 309 (5734): 570-574. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1111772
  6. Gonzalez P.Asner G.Battles J.Lefsky M.Waring K and Palace M. Forest carbon densities and uncertainties from Lidar, QuickBird, and field measurements in California. Remote Sensing of Environment 114: 1561-1575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.02.011
  7. He CY.Zhang D.Huang QX and Zhao YY. 2016. Assessing the potential impacts of urban expansion on regional carbon storage by linking the LUSD-urban and InVEST models. Environmental Modelling & Software 75: 44-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.09.015
  8. Hwang JH.Choi YY.Kim YJ.Lim NO.Yoo YJ.Cho HJ.Sun ZM and Jeon SW. 2021a. Analysis of the effect of environmental protected areas on land-use and carbon storage in a megalopolis. Ecological Indicators 133: 108352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108352
  9. Hwang JH.Choi YY.Yoo YJ.Sun ZM.Cho HJ.Jeon SW. 2021b. Analysis of Land Use Changes and Carbon Storage by Region under the Seoul Metropolitan Area Readjustment Planning Act Using the InVEST Carbon Model. Journal of Climate Chagne Research 12(5-1): 523-535 (in Korean with English summary) https://doi.org/10.15531/KSCCR.2021.12.5.523
  10. Hwang JH.Jang RI and Jeon SW. 2019. Redefine Scope of Protected Zone in Act on the Management and Improvement of Carbon Sink Article 10. Journal of Climate Change Research 10(4): 291-297. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.15531/ksccr.2019.10.4.291
  11. Jiang WG.Deng Y.Tang ZH.Lei X and Chen Z. 2017. Modelling the potential impacts of urban ecosystem changes on carbon storage under different scenarios by linking the CLUE-S and the InVEST models. Ecological Modelling 345: 30-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.12.002
  12. Jung JH and Kwon OY. 2014. GHG-AP Integrated Sink/Emission Inventories and Environmental Value Analysis in Vegetation Sector of Seoul. Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment 31(1): 72-82 (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2015.31.1.072
  13. Kim GH.Kim OS and Yoon JH. 2019. Urban Expansion Prediction Using Spatial DBMS Based Environmental Conservation Value Assessment Map. Journal of the Korean Cartographic Association 19(3): 35-42. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.16879/jkca.2019.19.3.035
  14. Kim GH.Lee EJ.Yoon JH.Lee JH and Hwang SY. 2018a. Evaluation of Land Use Management Grade Using Environmental Conservation Value Assessment Map (ECVAM) and Restriction on Acts of Use District. Journal of the association of Korean geographers, 7(3): 479-488. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.7.3.15
  15. Kim YH.Choi JY.Yoon JH.Kim OS and Kim GH. 2018b. Applicability Study on 1:5,000 Environmental Conservation Value Assessment Map (ECVAM) Using Precise Forest Type Map. Journal of the association of Korean geographers 7(1): 115-128. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.25202/jakg.7.1.9
  16. Kwon JO.Park SC and Baek SA. 2021. A study on the utilization of biotope map in urban planning. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 24(4): 31-46. (in Korean with English Summary) https://doi.org/10.13087/KOSERT.2021.24.4.31
  17. Lee CH. 2016. An Integrated Approach to Environmental Valuation. Sejong, Korea: Korea Environmental Institute. Policy Report 2016-10.
  18. Lee GH. 2008. Expansion of Carbon Absorption Sources in preparation for Post-2012 System. Planning and Policy 318: 18-25. (in Korean with English Summary)
  19. Li L.Song Y.Wei XH and Dong J. 2020. Exploring the impacts of urban growth on carbon storage under integrated spatial regulation: A case study of Wuhan, China. Ecological Indicators 111: 9.
  20. Lumbres RIC and Lee YJ. 2014. Aboveground biomass mapping of La Trinidad forests in Benguet, Philippines, using Landsat Thematic Mapper data and k-nearest neighbor method. Forest Science and Technology 10(2): 104- 111. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2013.866171
  21. Lyu RF.Mi LN.Zhang JM.Xu MQ and Li JJ. 2019. Modeling the effects of urban expansion on regional carbon storage by coupling SLEUTH-3r model and InVEST model. Ecological Research 34(3): 380-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.1278
  22. Meng Q.Cieszewski and Madden M. 2009. Large area forest inventory using Landsat ETM+: A geostatistical approach. ISPRS Journal of Phgotogrammetry and Remote Sensing 64(1): 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2008.06.006
  23. Rana P.Gautam B and Tokola T. 2016. Optimizing the number of training areas for modeling above-ground biomass with ALS and multispectral remote sensing in subtropical Nepal. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 49: 52-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2016.01.006
  24. Schlund M.Scipal K and Davidson MWJ. 2017. Forest classifciation and impact of BIOMASS resolution on forest area and aboveground biomass estimation. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 56: 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2016.12.001
  25. Sejong Special Self-Governing City. 2019. Sejong Special Self-Governing City Urban Ecological Map Construction Research Service. Research report to Sejong Special Self-Governing City. (in Korean)
  26. Song WK.Kim EY.Jeon SW.Park SH and Lee J. 2012. Improvement of the Criteria on Naturalness of the Environmental Conservation Value Assessment Map (ECVAM). Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 15(2): 31-40. (in Korean with English Summary)
  27. Suwon City. 2019. Suwon City Natural Environment Survey and Urban Ecological Map Update. Research report to Suwon City. (in Korean)
  28. Yun HY. 2005. A Study on the Legal and Institutional Improvement Strategies by Kyoto-Protocol in Forest Sector. Environmental Law Review, 27(4): 185-204 (in Korean with English Summary)