Anatomy and Cell Biology

Korean Association of Anatomists (대한해부학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Anatomy teaching in Saudi medical colleges- is there necessity of the national core syllabus of anatomy

  • Srinivasa Rao Bolla (Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University) ;
  • Radi Ali Al Saffar (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University)
  • Received : 2022.02.24
  • Accepted : 2022.06.22
  • Published : 2022.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Curricular updates in medicine resulted in changes in gross anatomy teaching. We aim to find the trends and methods of gross anatomy teaching in medicine programs in Saudi Arabia. Further, examine whether the data would help to discuss whether a core Anatomy syllabus is required. A survey questionnaire based on the earlier studies, was sent to the anatomy faculty of 25 medical colleges to collect the data on the pedagogic and dissection/laboratory approaches, inclusion of radiological, clinical, surface anatomy sessions, and the total number of hours allocated for anatomy education. A total of 15 responses were received from different medical colleges of which nine provided complete details. A wide variation in the component and mode of delivery of anatomy was observed. The number of hours for the anatomy course ranged from 89 to 388 hours. These data will provide an update on gross anatomy teaching approaches, which will help in making informed decisions in course revisions and adopting the best practices. The variations in anatomy course with short duration raises concern about whether the essential learning outcomes are achieved to prepare a skillful and safe clinician? do we require a core syllabus of Anatomy to be adopted at the national level to achieve the essential learning outcomes? The Anatomical Society, UK has developed core syllabi of Anatomy for undergraduate medical, dental, nursing, and pharmacy students, which can serve as a guide in developing the core syllabus of Anatomy for medicine in Saudi.

Keywords

References

  1. Thistlethwaite JE, Davies D, Ekeocha S, Kidd JM, MacDougall C, Matthews P, Purkis J, Clay D. The effectiveness of case-based learning in health professional education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 23. Med Teach 2012;34:e421-44.
  2. Burgess A, Ayton T, Mellis C. Implementation of team-based learning in year 1 of a PBL based medical program: a pilot study. BMC Med Educ 2016;16:49.
  3. Burgess A, Bleasel J, Haq I, Roberts C, Garsia R, Robertson T, Mellis C. Team-based learning (TBL) in the medical curriculum: better than PBL? BMC Med Educ 2017;17:243.
  4. Birden H, Glass N, Wilson I, Harrison M, Usherwood T, Nass D. Teaching professionalism in medical education: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 25. Med Teach 2013;35:e1252-66.
  5. Franco CAGDS, Franco RS, Lopes JMC, Severo M, Ferreira MA. Clinical communication skills and professionalism education are required from the beginning of medical training - a point of view of family physicians. BMC Med Educ 2018;18:43.
  6. Finucane PM, Johnson SM, Prideaux DJ. Problem-based learning: its rationale and efficacy. Med J Aust 1998;168:445-8.
  7. McMenamin PG. Body painting as a tool in clinical anatomy teaching. Anat Sci Educ 2008;1:139-44.
  8. Singh R, Shane Tubbs R, Gupta K, Singh M, Jones DG, Kumar R. Is the decline of human anatomy hazardous to medical education/profession?--A review. Surg Radiol Anat 2015;37:1257-65.
  9. Drake RL, Lowrie DJ Jr, Prewitt CM. Survey of gross anatomy, microscopic anatomy, neuroscience, and embryology courses in medical school curricula in the United States. Anat Rec 2002;269:118-22.
  10. Drake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, Pawlina W. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: the winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ 2009;2:253-9.
  11. Drake RL, McBride JM, Pawlina W. An update on the status of anatomical sciences education in United States medical schools. Anat Sci Educ 2014;7:321-5.
  12. Ellis H. Medico-legal litigation and its links with surgical anatomy. Surgery (Oxford) 2002;20:i-ii.
  13. Regenbogen SE, Greenberg CC, Studdert DM, Lipsitz SR, Zinner MJ, Gawande AA. Patterns of technical error among surgical malpractice claims: an analysis of strategies to prevent injury to surgical patients. Ann Surg 2007;246:705-11.
  14. Waterston SW, Stewart IJ. Survey of clinicians' attitudes to the anatomical teaching and knowledge of medical students. Clin Anat 2005;18:380-4.
  15. Craig S, Tait N, Boers D, McAndrew D. Review of anatomy education in Australian and New Zealand medical schools. ANZ J Surg 2010;80:212-6.
  16. Dissabandara LO, Nirthanan SN, Khoo TK, Tedman R. Role of cadaveric dissections in modern medical curricula: a study on student perceptions. Anat Cell Biol 2015;48:205-12.
  17. Smith CF, Finn GM, Stewart J, Atkinson MA, Davies DC, Dyball R, Morris J, Ockleford C, Parkin I, Standring S, Whiten S, Wilton J, McHanwell S. The Anatomical Society core regional anatomy syllabus for undergraduate medicine. J Anat 2016;228:15-23.
  18. Smith CF, Finn GM, Stewart J, McHanwell S. Anatomical Society core regional anatomy syllabus for undergraduate medicine: the Delphi process. J Anat 2016;228:2-14.
  19. General Medical Council (GMC). [Internet]. Dudley: The Ron Grimley Undergraduate Centre; c2022 [cited 2021 Dec 18]. Available from: http://www.rguc.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Outcomes_for_graduates_ July15.pdf.
  20. Leonard RJ. A clinical anatomy curriculum for the medical student of the 21st century: gross anatomy. Clin Anat 1996;9:71-99.
  21. Griffioen FM, Drukker J, Hoogland PV, Godschalk M. General plan anatomy objectives of the teaching of anatomy/embryology in medical curricula in The Netherlands. Eur J Morphol 1999;37:288-325.
  22. McHanwell S, Atkinson M, Davies DC, Dyball R, Morris J, Ockleford C, Parkin I, Standring S, Whiten S, Wilton J. A core syllabus in anatomy for medical students - adding common sense to need to know. Eur J Anat 2007;11(Suppl 1):3-18.
  23. Moxham BJ, McHanwell S, Berkovitz B. The development of a core syllabus for the teaching of oral anatomy, histology, and embryology to dental students via an international 'Delphi Panel'. Clin Anat 2018;31:231-49.
  24. Matthan J, Cobb M, McHanwell S, Moxham BJ, Finn GM. The Anatomical Society's core anatomy syllabus for dental undergraduates. J Anat 2020;236:737-51.
  25. Connolly SA, Gillingwater TH, Chandler C, Grant AW, Greig J, Meskell M, Ross MT, Smith CF, Wood AF, Finn GM. The Anatomical Society's core anatomy syllabus for undergraduate nursing. J Anat 2018;232:721-8.
  26. Finn GM, Hitch G, Apampa B, Hennessy CM, Smith CF, Stewart J, Gard PR. The Anatomical Society core anatomy syllabus for pharmacists: outcomes to create a foundation for practice. J Anat 2018;232:729-38.
  27. Webb AL, Green RA, Woodley SJ. The development of a core syllabus for teaching musculoskeletal anatomy of the vertebral column and limbs to medical students. Clin Anat 2019;32:974-1007.
  28. Moxham BJ, Stephens S, Sharma D, Loukas M. A core syllabus for the teaching of gross anatomy of the thorax to medical students. Clin Anat 2020;33:300-15.
  29. Tubbs RS, Sorenson EP, Sharma A, Benninger B, Norton N, Loukas M, Moxham BJ. The development of a core syllabus for the teaching of head and neck anatomy to medical students. Clin Anat 2014;27:321-30.
  30. Tubbs RS, Paulk PB. Essential anatomy of the head and neck: the complete Delphi Panel list. Clin Anat 2015;28:423.
  31. Moxham B, McHanwell S, Plaisant O, Pais D. A core syllabus for the teaching of neuroanatomy to medical students. Clin Anat 2015;28:706-16.