DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study on the Perception and Satisfaction of Urban Block Housing - Focused on Court-yard Housing Apartment Consisting of More Than Five Stories in Korea -

블록형 집합주택에 대한 인식과 만족도 비교 연구 - 우리나라 5층 이상 중정형 아파트를 중심으로 -

  • Kim, Nam-Hoon (Dept. of Urban Engineering, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Ahn, Jung-Geun (Dept. of Urban Engineering, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Bae, Min-Cheul (Dept. of Urban Engineering, Gyeongsang National University)
  • 김남훈 (경상국립대학교 도시공학과) ;
  • 안정근 (경상국립대학교 도시공학과) ;
  • 배민철 (경상국립대학교 도시공학과)
  • Received : 2022.07.19
  • Accepted : 2022.09.05
  • Published : 2022.10.30

Abstract

This study aims to discover the differences between nonresident perception and resident satisfaction of urban block housing also known as court-yard housing. There was a tendency in recognizing that the dwelling qualities of urban block housing such as daylight, noise, and privacy were poor compared to grouped flats or grouped towers in Korea. This kind of perception was one of the main reasons why court-yard housing had not been widely adapted except for a few cases in Korea. This study objectifies the prejudice against them in the characteristics of units, courtyards, and neighborhood community streets through a survey conducted on a varied range of people related to building housing complexes; a cross-tabulation test was carried out to verify the homogeneity of these results. It was revealed that people were concerned about the shortage of daylight, but occupants were satisfied with the abundant sunlight made by the mid and low-rise buildings. People anticipated a lot of noise from the courtyard, but residents perceived that to be insignificant. On the contrary, the noise from the neighborhood community street was a real concern. People worried about the invasion of privacy and the closeness of a unit in court-yard housing, however tenants were insusceptible to privacy invasion and recognized the openness of a unit. People showed high expectation and gratification about the street-scope and shops in neighborhood community streets as an important social space for interactions. Consequently, it was confirmed that huge differences between perception and satisfaction of court-yard housing existed. It was inferred that the amenities in court-yard housing wasn't necessarily sufficient amid the familiar circumstances of flats and towers. Negative opinions were being unconsciously reproduced by these social atmospheres that a house was considered more of an economic tool rather than a living space for both consumer and supplier. As a result of this study, the possibility of applying urban block housing or courtyard housing would be easier than before. Various sizes of housing blocks and styles of housing buildings strongly interacting with neighborhood community streets play a pivotal role in rehabilitating the public function of resident areas while vitalizing the community in its respective regions.

Keywords

References

  1. Gelezeau, V. (2007). Republic of Apartment, Humanitas, 237.
  2. Ha, J.Y., & Im, Y.K. (2011). A study of building performance evaluation and legal system improvement of perimeter block housing, Architecture & Urban Research Institute, 11-22.
  3. Jacobs, J. (1961). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York, Random House, 30-35.
  4. Kang, B.S., & Park, J.H. (2004). A study on post occupancy evaluation of the block housing, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 20(5), 3-10.
  5. Kang, I.H., & Park, S.Y. (2006). A study on the design characteristics of court housing in korea, Journal of Korean Housing Association, 17(5), 107-116.
  6. Kim, K.R., & Kim, C.H. (2021). A study on the impact of gated communities on walking accessibility to elementary schools, Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea Urban Design, 22(2), 80.
  7. Park, C.S. (2006). Cultural History of Apartment, Salim, 5-7.
  8. Park, K.J. (1998). A Study on Spatial Order and Planning Methods for Multi-family Housing Complex, Ph D. Dissertation, Kon-Kuk University, 15.
  9. Shin, B.H., Paik, H.S., & Lee, Y.H. (2022). Details of Improvement for Residential Environment by Urban Street-Oriented Development, Land and Housing Institute
  10. Son, S.K. (1993). A History of Urban Housing, Yealhadang, 298-301.
  11. Son, S.K., & Han, K.J. (2006). A study on the applicability of urban block housing to the residential area in seoul, Journal of the Urban Design Institute of Korea Urban Design, 7(2), 147-164.
  12. Urban Architecture Integration Planning Office. (2021). A New Approach to Urban Space - Urban Architecture Integration Master Plan Design Record, LH, 32, 54-77.
  13. Woo, D.J. (2013). A study on the plan for enhancing diversity of the block types and strengthening the connections between streets and housing Design, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 29(1), 115-122.