대한건축학회논문집 (Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea)

  • 제38권10호
  • /
  • Pages.155-166
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2733-6239(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-6247(eISSN)
대한건축학회 (Architectural Institute of Korea)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

고급문화로서의 현대건축의 비생산적 소비 - 표피적임과 덧없음의 의미를 중심으로 -

Non-Productive Consumption in Contemporary Architecture as a High Culture - Meaning of Skin-deep and Ephemeral -

  • 투고 : 2022.08.12
  • 심사 : 2022.09.13
  • 발행 : 2022.10.30
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Today's architecture refers to the status of art in the modern sense rather than non-representation and formality, and it is captured that cultural consumers continue to imply that Architecture is considered a high culture. Thus, the purpose of this study is to find out the meaning of the ornamental trend of skin-deep and ephemeral of contemporary Architecture through a theoretical review of consumption, not the logic of productivity. Modern avant-garde art to represent progress and modernity accelerated the differentiation of senses by collapsing the orthodox high culture. Meanwhile, modern architecture which combines art and usefulness forced the representation of abstraction as an unspoken Ornamental representing modernity. Due to the strictness of modernism, the spectacle which collectively refers to extreme visibility has been cited in critical discourse. In the society of spectacle and consumption images proliferate illimitably, and everything has been regarded as an object of exchange, and capital reproduces exchange value and sign value. The most strategic resistance in this society is the over-adaptive Simualtion, and consequently tlathe meaning of symbolic exchange can be found. In the flood of images, the bourgeois culture of critical intonation is surrendering to pure culture, and the anti-art experiment of architecture is being attempted steadily. After the limitations of Taylorism and Fordism, architectural mannerism presents the meaning of novelty as a contradictory word, and the logic of unnecessary and excessive ornament appears as a sensitization of architecture. Nowdays architects are constantly creating unusual things, rejecting the present and returning to the system of construction, or conversely leading to the illusion of Baroque mannerism. Unlike personal luxury acting as a means of accumulating capital, contemporary architectural luxury is a cultural experiment on virtuality. Today's architectural luxury for individuals has become like a gift without a price, creating a symbolic exchange, which does not mean novelty and compulsion to overthrow the system. The unproductive consumption of architecture is the consumption of things that are not necessary to approach the essence.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2021년도 호남대학교 학술연구비 지원을 받아 연구되었음.

참고문헌

  1. Bataille, G. (2000). The Accursed Share (H. Cho, Trans.). Munhakdongne Publishing, 23-25. (Original work published 1949)
  2. Baudrillard, J. (2001). Simulacres et Simulation (T. Ha, Trans.). Minumsa, 52, 71, 198-199. (Original work published 1981)
  3. Baudrillard, J. (2017). Symbolic Exchange and Death (I. Grant, Trans.). Cal, Sage Publications, 123-124. (Original work published 1976)
  4. Bong, I. (2002). Architecture-Unbuilt 20th Century: City Events and Structure. Spacetime, 144-148.
  5. Ciret, Y. (2002, February 22). Guy debord - strateg svoga stoljeca (G. Jung, Trans.). Literature and Society, (57), 364-386. (Original work published 2001)
  6. Crane, D. (2012). The Transformation of the Avant-Garde : The New York Art World 1940-1985 (J. Cho, Trans.). Bookorea, 23-25. (Original work published 1987)
  7. Debord, G. (1967). The Society of the Spectacle. theanarchistlibrary. Retrieved July 15, 2022 from https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/guy-debord-the-society-of-the-spectacle.pdf
  8. Fehrenbacher, J. (2005, July 11). Jean nouvel's louisiana manifesto. Inhabitat. Retrieved July 15, 2022 from https://inhabitat.com/jean-nouvels-louisiana-manifesto/
  9. Foster, H. (2002). Design and Crime: And Other Diatribes. Verso, 60-62.
  10. Hahn, S. (2013). Studies about relationships between trends of architecture in 1980-1990s and modern architecture, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 29(12), 170.
  11. Haralambidou, P. (2013) Marcel Duchamp and the Architecture of Desire. London, Ashgate, 240-241.
  12. Hobsbawm, E. (2015). Fractured Times: Culture and Society in the Twentieth Century (K. Lee, Trans.). Kachi Publishing, 10-15, 38-39, 272-291. (Original work published 2013)
  13. Hong, S. (2014). Politics of Taste. Hyeonamsa, 41-42, 66-69.
  14. Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, Duke University Press, 58-64.
  15. Jencks, C. (1980). Late-Modern Architecture. London, Academy Editions, 32-80.
  16. Kaminer, T. (2014). Architecture, Crisis and Resuscitation : The Reproduction of Post-Fordism in Late-TwentiethCentury Architecture (S. Cho, Trans.). Spacetime, 63-75. (Original work published 2011)
  17. Kang, H. (2006). Presentation and representation of modernity in modern architecture, Journal of Achitectural History, 15(4), 42-43, 53.
  18. Kim, H. (2016). A Study on the generative background and characteristics of gesamtkunstwerk design theory advocated by Wiener Werkstatte and Josef Hoffmann, Journal of the Korea Institute of Interior Design, 2(6), 115-116. https://doi.org/10.14774/JKIID.2016.25.1.115
  19. Lee, R. (2019). A Study on the theoretical Foundations of the Space Scenography, Journal of Korean Institute of Culture Architecture, (66), 173.
  20. Lim, K. (2007). A Study on the Border-Dismantling Tendency in the Contemporary Architecture, Ph. D. Dissertation, Hongik University, 33-34.
  21. Lim, S. (1997, October). From space to square. C3Korea, (158), 47-49.
  22. Lipovetsky, G. (2017). De la legerete (H. Lee, Trans.). Moonye Publishing, 9, 345-347. (Original work published 2015)
  23. Lucan, J. (2019). Precisions sur un etat present de l'architecture: Architecture et theories, XIXe-XXe siecles (S. Nam, Trans.). Spacetime, 156-158. (Original work published 2015)
  24. Oh, M. (1998). Jean Baudrillard, politics of resignation, In/Outside: English Studies in Korea, (5), 204-223.
  25. Park, J. (2019). Ambivalence between consumer society and avant-garde in contemporary architecture, Journal of Korean Institute of Culture Architecture, (67), 234.
  26. Park, J. (2020a). Ambivalence between Avant-garde and Consumption in Contemporary Architecture, Ph. D. Dissertation, Hongik University.
  27. Park, J. (2020b). A study on the reversal strategy of avant-garde art in contemporary architecture, Journal of Korean Institute of Culture Architecture, (72), 79-80.
  28. Park. Y. (2013). A Study on Expression Characteristics of Subversive Mimesis in Architecture after Reflexive Modernization, Ph. D. Dissertation, Hongik University. 105-107.
  29. Pawlet, W. (2007). Jean Baudrillard: Against Banality. Florida, CRC Press, 21-22.
  30. Tatarkiewicz, W. (2014). Modern Aesthetics: 003 (H. Son, Trans.). Misulmunhwa, 297-308, 626-639. (Original work published 1974)