References
- Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
- Behrens, J. T., Mislevy, R. J., DiCerbo, K. E., & Levy, R. (2010). An evidence centered design for learning and assessment in the digital world. CRESST Report 778. National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
- Bejar, I. I. (2002). Generative testing: From conception to implementation. In S. H. Irvine & P. C. Kyllonen (Eds.), Item generation for test development (pp.199-217). Erlbaum.
- Bloom, B. (1956). Bloom's taxonomy.
- Bryan, V. M., & Mayer, J. D. (2020). A meta-analysis of the correlations among broad intelligences: Understanding their relations. Intelligence, 81.
- Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. 1979. Reliability and Validity Assessment. SAGE.
- CLASS [website]. (2022.01.28.). URL: https://class-analytics.com/
- Drasgow, F., Luecht, R. M., & Bennett, R. (2006). Technology and testing. In Educational measurement (4th ed.). American Council on Education/Praeger Publishers.
- Embretson, S. E. (1998). A cognitive design system approach to generating valid tests: Application to abstract reasoning. Psychological methods, 3(3), 380. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.3.380
- Embretson, S., & Yang, X. (2006). 23 Automatic item generation and cognitive psychology. Handbook of statistics, 26, 747-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7161(06)26023-1
- Flanagan, D. P., Ortiz, S. O., & Alfonso, V. C. (2013). Essentials of cross-battery assessment (3rd ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
- Gierl, M. J., & Haladyna, T. M. (Eds.). (2012). Automatic item generation: Theory and practice. Routledge.
- Gierl, M. J., Lai, H., & Tanygin, V. (2021). Advanced methods in automatic item generation (1st ed.). Routledge.
- Goldberg, T. E., Harvey, P. D., Wesnes, K. A., Snyder, P. J., & Schneider, L. S. (2015). Practice effects due to serial cognitive assessment: implications for preclinical Alzheimer's disease randomized controlled trials. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring, 1(1), 103-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2014.11.003
- Irvine, Sidney H., & Kyllonen, P. C. (Eds.). (2002). Item generation for test development (1st ed). Routledge.
- Jutten, R. J., Rentz, D. M., Fu, J. F., Mayblyum, D. V., Amariglio, R. E., Buckley, R. F., Properzi, M. J., Maruff, P., Stark, C. E., Yassa, M. A., Johnson, K. A., Sperling, R. A., & Papp, K. V. (2021). Monthly at-home computerized cognitive testing to detect diminished practice effects in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 13.
- Lakin, J. M. (2018). Making the Cut in Gifted Selection: Score Combination Rules and Their Impact on Program Diversity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62(2), 210-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/0016986217752099
- Latex [website]. (2022.02.10.). URL: https://www.latex-project.org/
- McGrew, K. S. (2009). CHC theory and the human cognitive abilities project: Standing on the shoulders of the giants of psychometric intelligence research. Intelligence, 37(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2008.08.004
- Mislevy, R. J., Almond, R. G., & Lukas, J. F. (2004). A brief introduction to evidencecentered design. CSE Report 632. US Department of Education.
- Mislevy, R. J., Steinberg, L. S., & Almond, R. G. (2003). Focus article: On the structure of educational assessments. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 1(1), 3-62. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15366359MEA0101_02
- Osborne, C. (1991). Statistical calibration: A review. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, 309-336.
- Park, H. J., Ryoo, H. S., Kwon, J., & Ryoo, J. H. (2022). Change of paradigm on LMS for online education: LMS implementing learning analytics and online assessment. The Educational Research for Tomorrow, 35(2), 49-72.
- Riverside Insights [website]. (2022.02.05). URL: https://www.riversideinsights.com/home
- Ryoo, J. H., Park, S., Suh, H., Choi, J., & Kwon, J. (2022). Development of a new measure of cognitive ability using automatic item generation and its psychometric properties. SAGE Open, 12(2), 21582440221095016.
- Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2012). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence. In D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Test, and Issues (pp. 99-144). Guilford Publications.
- Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. S. (2018). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In D. P. Flanagan & E. M. McDonough (Eds.), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment. Theories, Tests, and Issues (4th ed., pp. 73-163). The Guilford Press.
- Stanek, K. M., Gunstad, J., Spitznagel, M. B., Waechter, D., Hughes, J. W., Luyster, F., ... & Rosneck, J. (2011). Improvements in cognitive function following cardiac rehabilitation for older adults with cardiovascular disease. International Journal of Neuroscience, 121(2), 86-93. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207454.2010.531893
- Taherdoost, H. (2016). Validity and reliability of the research instrument; how to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research (August 10, 2016).
- Thompson, B. (2011). What is the CogAT(Cognitive Abilities Test) and Why use it?, Homeschool Handbook.
- Warnimont, C. (2010). The relationship between students' performance on the cognitive abilities test (COGAT) and the fourth and fifth grade reading and math achievement tests in Ohio (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Bowling Green State University, USA.
- Wesnes, K., & Pincock, C. (2002). Practice effects on cognitive tasks: A major problem?. The Lancet Neurology, 1(8), 473. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(02)00236-3