정부 기업지원 사업이 기업성장에 미치는 영향: 흡수역량 및 기업지원 만족도의 매개효과를 중심으로

The Effect of Government Corporate Support Projects on Corporate Growth: Focusing on the Mediation Effect of Absorption Capacity and Enterprise Support Satisfaction

  • 김수길 (대전대학교 융합컨설팅학과) ;
  • 현병환 (대전대학교 융합컨설팅학과)
  • Kim, Su gil (Dept. of Business Consulting Graduate School, Daejeon University) ;
  • Hyun, Byung-Hwan (Dept. of Business Consulting Graduate School, Daejeon University)
  • 투고 : 2022.05.09
  • 심사 : 2022.08.26
  • 발행 : 2022.08.30

초록

정부는 기업지원을 통하여 기업의 성장을 지원하며, 기업지원 사업의 컨트롤 타워로 중소벤처기업부를 설립하는 등 정책 효율성을 높이는 정책을 추진하고 있다. 그러나 정부의 기업지원 사업의 효율성에 대한 의견은 분분하며, 본 연구에서는 정부 기업 지원 사업이 기업성과에 어떤 영향을 미치는지와 내부적 요인인 흡수역량 및 만족도가 기업성장에 어떤 영향을 미치는지 확인하고자 한다. 정부의 기업지원 사업 수혜기업을 대상으로 설문을 통하여 연구를 진행하였으며, 선행연구들이 정부의 기업지원사업 중 재무적 지원을 중심으로 연구했던 것에 반해 정부 지원 사업을 재무적 지원과 비재무적 지원으로 구분하여 정부 기업지원의 효과를 분석하였으며, 흡수역량 및 기업지원 만족도를 구분하여 분석하였다. 이를 통해 정부의 기업지원 사업에 흡수역량 및 기업지원 만족도의 매개효과에 따라 기업의 재무적 성과 및 비재무적 성과에 미치는 효과를 실증분석하였다. 그 결과 정부의 재무적 지원과 비재무적 지원 모두 재무적 성과와 비재무적 성과에 긍정적 영향을 미쳤으며, 흡수역량 및 기업지원 만족도 모두 재무적 성과 및 비재무적 성과 모두를 매개하는 것으로 확인하였으며, 정(+)의 영향을 미치는 것으로 분석되었다. 이와 같은 연구 결과를 바탕으로 기업의 흡수역량을 향상하기 위해서는 조직문화 및 장기적 시점에서 조직 구성원들이 지식을 공유하고 발전할 수 있도록 사업을 구성을 구성하고 운영하고, 기업지원 만족도의 경우 공급자와 수요자 네트워크 구축을 통하여 기업이 직면한 문제를 정의하고 해결방안을 제안하거나 추가적 지원을 통하여 기업의 성장을 지원하는 시스템을 만들고 운영하며 공급자와 수요자 피드백을 통한 운영효율 개선 및 효율성 극대화 전략을 추진하여 기업지원 사업의 효율성을 개선하는 데 의미가 있을 것으로 기대된다.

The government is promoting policies to increase policy efficiency by supporting corporate growth through corporate support and establishing the Ministry of SMEs and Startups as a control tower for corporate support projects. However, opinions on the efficiency of the government's corporate support project are divided, and this study aims to check how the government's corporate support project affects corporate performance and how absorption capacity and satisfaction, which are internal factors, affect corporate growth. Research was conducted on companies receiving government corporate support projects, and previous studies focused on financial support among government corporate support projects, while the effect of government corporate support was analyzed by dividing government support projects into financial and non-financial support, and absorption capabilities and corporate support satisfaction were analyzed. Through this, the effect on corporate financial performance and non-financial performance was empirically analyzed according to the mediating effect of absorption capacity and corporate support satisfaction in the government's corporate support project. As a result, both the government's financial and non-financial support had a positive effect on financial and non-financial performance, and it was confirmed that both absorption capacity and corporate support satisfaction mediate both financial and non-financial performance, and it was analyzed that it had a positive (+) effect. In order to improve the absorption capacity of a company, it is expected that it will be meaningful to improve the efficiency of the business by defining the problems faced by the company and suggesting solutions through the establishment of a supplier and consumer network.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahn, S. G., Kim, J. H., & Kim, J. I.(2017). The effect of the government's R&D support on investment by mid-sized companies. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 20(3), 546-575.
  2. Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J.(1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Journal of Strategic Management. 14(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250140105
  3. Arrow, K.(1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention, in Nelson, R. (Ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton University Press, 609-625.
  4. Bae, S. J., Ko, C. R., & Seol, S. S.(2017). Suitability Analysis of SMEs Support Means by Customized Information Analysis. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 20(1), 81-102.
  5. Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Philipps, L. W.(1991). Assessing Construct Validity in Organization Research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 421-458. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393203
  6. Barney, J.(1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management. 17(1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
  7. Basso, A., Baltar, E., & Andonova, E.(2018). Startup Innovation Ecosystems in Southern Europe. Brussels European Commission, 113872, 4-9.
  8. Bozic, K., & Dimovski, V.(2019). Business intelligence and analytics for value creation: The role of absorptive capacity. International Journal of Information Management, 46, 93-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.11.020
  9. Byun, C. G., & Ha, H. H.(2013). An Application of Dominance Analysis and Regression Analysis for Determining the Relative Importance of Critical Factors in Satisfaction of Start-up Support Service Program. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 8(3), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.8.3.201309.67
  10. Cho, H. N., & Kim, J. K.(2019). The Effect of Government R&D Subsidies on Private R&D Investment. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 1-30.
  11. Cho, N. M., & Oh, S. J.(2018). The Effect of Absorption Capacity and Unlearning Capacity on the Innovation Behavior of Members in the Organization: Focused on Mediation of Knowledge Creation and Knowledge Sharing. Korean Business Education Review, 33(3), 261-289. https://doi.org/10.23839/kabe.2018.33.3.261
  12. Chundakkadan, R., & Sasidharan, S.(2020). Financial constraints, government support, and firm innovation: empirical evidence from developing economies. Innovation and Development, 10(3), 279-301. https://doi.org/10.1080/2157930X.2019.1594680
  13. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A.(1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  14. Czarnitzki, D., Hussinger, K., & Leten, B.(2011). The Market Value of Blocking Patent Citations. ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper 11-021.
  15. Daiyou, X., & Jinxia, S.(2022). Macroeconomic lockdown effects of COVID-19 on small business in China: empirical insights from SEM technique. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-13.
  16. Darwish, T. K., Zeng, J., Rezaei Zadeh, M., & Haak-Saheem, W.(2020). Organizational learning of absorptive capacity & innovation: Does leadership matter?. European Management Review, 17(1), 83-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12320
  17. De Marco, C. E., Martelli, I., & Di Minin, A.(2020). European SMEs' Engagement in Open Innovation When the Important Thing Is toWin and Not Just to Participate, What Should Innovation Policy Do?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 152, 119843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119843
  18. Duchek, S.(2013). Capturing absorptive capacity: A critical review and future prospects. Schmalenbach Business Review. 65(3), 312-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396860
  19. Durst, S., & Gerstlberger, S.(2021). Financing Responsible Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises_An International Overview of Policies and Support Programmes. Journal of Risk and Financial Management. 14(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm14010010
  20. Dzung, B., Lena, D., Bernd, H., & Giang, N.(2022). The effects of fiscal policy on households during the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Thailand and Vietnam. World Development, 153, 105828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105828
  21. El Mercurio(2020). 10 Anos de Start-Up Chile: cifras revelan un alto retorno de la inversion, pero bajo financiamiento para negocios liderados por mujeres. Santiago. El Mercurio Newspaper. Retrieved(2022.04.12.) https://revistaemprende.cl/start-up-chile-a-10-anos-de-sucreacion-1-960-emprendimientos-apoyados-mas-de-14-mil-empleos-generados-y-us-12-mil-millones-en-ventas-acumuladas/.
  22. Erramilli, M. K., & Rao, C. P.(1993). Service Firms' International Entry-mode Choice: A Modified Transaction-cost Analysis Approach. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 19-38.
  23. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F.(1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Algebra and statistics, 18(3), 382-388.
  24. Garvin, D. A.(2000). Learning in action: A guide to putting the learning organization to work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  25. Grant, R. M.(1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic management Journal, 17(S2), 109-122. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171110
  26. Gil, W. G., Bae, H. B., Shim, Y. H., & Kim, S. K.(2018). A Study on the Improvement the Start-up Support Policy: Focused on the ICT Start-up. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 13(4), 117-128 https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.13.4.201808.117
  27. Global Startup Ecosystem Report(2018). Succeeding in the New Era of Technology, Startup Genome. Startup Genome & Global Entrepreneurship Network, 21, 34.
  28. Guo, D., Guo, Y., & Jiang, K.(2022). Government R&D support and firms' access to external financing: funding effects, certification effects, or both?. Technovation, 115, 102469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102469
  29. Gupta, A., & Govindarajan, V.(1984). Business unit strategy, managerial characteristics and business unit effectiveness at strategy implementation. Journal of Academy of Management, 27(1), 25-41.
  30. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M.(2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  31. Hall, B., & Van Reenen, J.(2000). How Effective are Fiscal Incentives for R&D? A Rreview of the Evidence. Research Policy, 29(4-5), 449-469. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00085-2
  32. Hanks, S., & Chandler, G. N.(1994). The impact of new venture growth research on entrepreneurship education. Frontiers in Entrepreneurship Research.
  33. Hwangbo, Y., & Kim, J. H.(2016). Impact of Start-Up Incubator Service On the Start-up Performance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 11(5), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.11.5.201610.57
  34. Isenberg, D.(2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Presentation at the Institute of International and European Affairs, 1(781), 1-13.
  35. Isensee, C., Teuteberg, F., Griese, K. M., & Topi, C.(2020). The Relationship between Organizational Culture, Sustainability, and Digitalization in SMEs. A Systematic Review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122944
  36. Islam, E. S., Ahmed, M. E., Zakaria, E., & Karam, M. G.(2021). The COVID-19 pandemic: The mitigating role of government and hotel support of hotel employees in Egypt. Tourism Management, 85, 104305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104305
  37. Jang, S. D., Christopher, S., & Lee, S. S.(2008). Failure of High-Tech Venture Firms: Integrating Age-Dependence and Resource-Based Perspectives. Advancing Small Enterprise Innovation Research, 11(2), 41-63.
  38. Jang, S. J., Kim, K. H., & Yoon, S. P.(2016). Differences in R&D Efficiency of Enterprises by Government-Supported Types With the IoT industry at the center. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 713-729
  39. Jang, Y. H., Lee, J. H., & Kim, P. S.(2020). The Effect of Government's Fairness as the Entrepreneur's Satisfactions & Managerial Performance: Focusing on the Differences between Start-up Companies' Growth Stages. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 15(4), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.15.4.202008.109
  40. Jeon, C. S.(2011). An Empirical Study on Corporate Financial Performance. Master's Thesis, Paichai University.
  41. Jeong, Y. H., Lee, C. S., & Lee, J. D.(2003). Comparison of Characteristics and Performance between Firms in the Incubation Centers at University and Research Institute. Asia Pacific Journal of Samall Business, 25(3), 159-183.
  42. Jon, C. H., Kai, H. T., Ming, Y. H., Yen, C. K., & Jhih, S. C.(2017). Internet cognitive failure relevant to users' satisfaction with content and interface design to reflect continuance intention to use a government e-learning system. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 353-362 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.044
  43. Jung, K. H.(2020). Effectiveness Analysis of Startup Support Policy of Early Start-ups: Moderating Effect of the Industry and Growth Stage of the Start-ups. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.15.1.202002.59
  44. Kang, H. I.(2020). The Effect of ICT Government R&D Support on Corporate Revenue and Export. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 146-158.
  45. Kang, J. S., & Cho, K. T.(2018). An Analysis of the Effect of Government Support on Automation and Smart Factory. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 21(2), 738-766.
  46. Kaplan, R. S.(1984). The evolution of management accounting. The Accounting Review. 59(3), 390-418.
  47. Khanh, H., Muhammadb, A., & Cuongb, N.(2022). Corporate investment and government policy during the COVID-19 crisis. International Review of Economics and Finance, 80, 677-696. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.03.005
  48. Kim, D. J., Park, J. S., & Park, D. I.(2017). Effects of Justice Perception of Start-Up Support System on Expectancy Effect and Satisfaction: Focusing on Venture For Korea. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 12(3), 107-117. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.12.3.201706.107
  49. Kim, G. H., & Won, Y. H.(2015). An Analysis on Performance influence factors of Enterprise Support based upon the Local Industrial Development Policy: Focused on the Industry Types of Region-Specialized Industries. Korean Policy Sciences Review, 19(2), 31-51.
  50. Kim, K. W.(2008). An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Government R&D Subsidies on Corporate Performance. KDI Research Report.
  51. Kim, S. S., Jeon, B. H., & Yoon, S. I.(2020). Meta-analysis on the Effect of Startup Support Policies to Startup Performance. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 15(6), 95-114. https://doi.org/10.16972/apjbve.15.1.202002.95
  52. Kim, S. W., & Jung, H. J.(2019). Comparison and implications of R&D support for SMEs in Korea and the United States. STEPI Insight, 231, 1-32.
  53. Kim, Y. J., Seo, Y. K., & Hong, J. I.(2018). The Effects of Internal Competence and Growth Stages on the Performance of Venture Business: the Moderating Effect in Connection with Government Funding Utilization. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 21(2), 636-662
  54. Korea Business Incubation Association(2020). A start-up child care center. Retrieved(2020.10.30) from https://www.bi.go.kr/incubate/bi/view.do.
  55. Koo, D. M.(2015). Fundamental Regulation Mediation Effect Analysis Research Methodology. Seoul: Changmyeong.
  56. Kumar, V. B., & Shirish, S.(2022). Structural process model of absorptive capacity for stakeholder's integration in decision-making: dynamic capability perspective. Society and Business Review, 17(3), 421-440. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-05-2021-0067
  57. Kwon, H. S., & Hwang, D. H.(2019). The Analysis on the Effect of Public R&D System for Performance of Small-medium Enterprises: Focusing on the Mediating Effect of the Asymmetric Information. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 22(6), 1107-1137. https://doi.org/10.35978/jktis.2019.12.22.6.1107
  58. Lecraw, D. J.(1984). Bargaining Power, Ownership, and Profitability of Transnational Corporations in Developing Countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 15, 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490469
  59. Lee, B. H., Lee, S. W., & We, S. A.(2014). The Effect of Government R&D Supports on SME's Technological Innovation Performance in Korea. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 9(5), 157-171.
  60. Lee, C. G., & Seo, Y. U.(2019). A Research on the Activation Measures of Youth Entrepreneurship through Analysis of Local Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: Focused on Entrepreneurship Program Participants in Daejeon. Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Socieity, 13(6), 182-207. https://doi.org/10.24878/TKES.2018.13.6.182
  61. Lee, D. H.(2000). Operational Characteristics and Success Factors of Korea's Startup Childcare Project. STEPI Research Report.
  62. Lee, H. J., Kim, S. H., & Ge, H. S.(2007). An Empirical Study on the Performance of ITBI's Tenant. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 10(2), 727-754.
  63. Lee, J. S.(2011). A Study on Determinants of Technology Innovation Performance: Based on the Roles of R&D Investment, Governmental Support and Information Sources. Master's Thesis, Konkuk University.
  64. Lee, K. H., & Ha K. S.(2022). A Effects of Start-up Preparation, Start-up Support Policy And Accelerator Support on Business Satisfaction. Journal of Digital Convergence, 20(4), 333-342. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2022.20.4.333
  65. Lee, S. J., & Kim, T. Y.(2015). A Study on Determinants of National R&D Projects: With the Focus on the National R&D for the Competitiveness Enhancement of the Parts and Materials Industry. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 18(4), 590-620.
  66. Lee, W. S., & Kim, B. Y.(2019). Business sustainability of start-ups based on government support: An empirical study of Korean start-ups. Sustainability, 11(18), 4851. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184851
  67. Lee, Y. H., & Song, Y. J.(2019). The Effects of the Government Funding on Venture Firms' Management Performance Focusing on the Mediation Effect of Firms' Internal Competencies and the Moderation Effect of Firm's Growth Stage. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.14.2.201904.31
  68. Li, X., Huang, L., Ren, A., Li, Q., & Zeng, X.(2021). The Effect of Production Structure Roundaboutness on the Innovation Capability of High-Tech Enterprises The Mediating Role of Technology Absorption Path. Sustainability, 14(9), 5116.
  69. Lin, B. W., Lee, Y. S., & Hung, S. C.(2006). R&D Intensity and Commercialization Orientation Effects on Financial Performance. Journal of Business Research, 59(6), 679-685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.01.002
  70. Ling, N., Aneiros, G., & Vieu, P.(2020). kNN estimation in functional partial linear modeling. Statistical Papers, 61(1), 423-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00362-017-0946-0
  71. Liu, Y. H., Kim, C. Y., Lee, E. H., & Yoo, J. W.(2022). Relationship between Sustainable Management Activities and Financial Performance: Mediating Effects of Non-Financial Performance and Moderating Effects of Institutional Environment. Journal of Sustainability, 14(3), 1168. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031168
  72. Locke, E. A., Sirota, D., & Wolfson, A. D.(1976). An experimental case study of the successes and failures of job enrichment in a government agency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(6), 701-711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.6.701
  73. Mahmood, R., & Norshafizah, H.(2013). Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance of Women-Owned Small and Medium Enterprises in Malaysia: Competitive Advantage as a Mediator. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(1), 82-89.
  74. Mahoney, J. T.(1995). The management of resources and the resource of management. Journal of Business Research. 33(2), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)00060-R
  75. March, J. G.(1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
  76. Marrucci, L., Iannone, F., Daddi, T., & Iraldo, F.(2021). Antecedents of absorptive capacity in the development of circular economy business models of small and medium enterprises. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 532-544.
  77. Mayuri. H.(2020). Business Incubators: Meaning, Definition, Services. Development and Types, https://www.businessmanagementideas.com/.
  78. Mcwiliams, A., & Siegel, D.(2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification. Journal of Strategic Management, 21(4), 603-609. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3
  79. Meng, L. H., & Zhou, J.(2021). Trait conscientiousness, thriving at work, career satisfaction and job satisfaction: Can supervisor support make a difference?. Personality and Individual Differences, 183, 111116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111116
  80. Mian, S.(2011). University's involvement in technology business incubation: what theory and practice tell us?. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 13(2), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2011.038854
  81. Min, K. Y.(2010). An Empirical Study on the Effect of Entrepreneurial Consulting for the Business Performance of Start-Up. Master's Thesis, Chung-Ang University.
  82. Ministry of SMEs and Startups(2022a). 2022 Business Report. Retrieved(2022.04.11) https://www.mss.go.kr/site/smba/main.do.
  83. Ministry of SMEs and Startups(2022b). Announcement of the Integration of Startup Support Projects in 2022. Retrieved(2022.04.11) https://www.mss.go.kr/site/smba/main.do.
  84. Ministry of SMEs and Startups(2022c). Start-up Support Project Guidebook. Retrieved(2022.08.17.) https://www.k-startup.go.kr/web/contents/webFND_GUIDE.do.
  85. Nam, Y. H.(2021). A Study on the Effect of the Internal Characteristics of Startup and the Relationship with Public Enterprises on Management Performance. Doctoral dissertation, Daejeon University.
  86. National Business Incubation Association(2010). Fundamentals of Incubator Management. NBIA Preconference Institute.
  87. Niven, P. R.(2002). Balanced scorecard step-by-step: Maximizing performance and maintaining results. John Wiley & Sons.
  88. Nor', A. A., Arifhabt, M., Jogeswari, R., SitiRoshaidaAbd, R., Azman, I., & FarizaMd, S.(2021). The Role of Career Function, Quality Relationship on Mentee's Job Satisfaction: A Moderating Model Approach. Elementary Education Online, 20(4), 695-705.
  89. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H.(1994). Psychometric Theory, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  90. Oh, S. H., & Kim, S. W.(2017). Current Status and Performance Analysis of SME R&D Support. STEPI Insight, 211, 1-27.
  91. Oh S. H., & Jang. P. S.(2020). The Effect of Government R&D Support on Manufacturing Firms' Innovation Activities and Innovation Performance. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 23(5), 941-966. https://doi.org/10.35978/jktis.2020.10.23.5.941
  92. Oliver, R. L.(1980). A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decision. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378001700405
  93. Onyiewu, S.(2015). Does Lack of Innovation Capability and Absorptive Capacity Retard Economic Growth in Africa?. Growth and Institutions in African Development, 41-57.
  94. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L.(1994). Alternative Scales for measurin Service Quality: A Comparative Assessment based on Psychometric and Diagnostic Criteria. Journal of Retailing, 70(3), 201-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4359(94)90033-7
  95. Park, H. S., & Seo, Y. W.(2020). A Study on the Impact of Entrepreneurial Action and Government Support through the Network on Management Performance. Journal of Distribution and Management Research, 23(2), 19-35.
  96. Park, S. H.(2021). A Study for the effects of perceived startup environments on the performance of university business incubators and tenant companies: from the managers' perspective. Doctoral dissertation, Hannam University.
  97. Park, Y. W., Chung, Y. H., & Son, H. S.(2022). Configurational paths for SMEs' innovation: focusing on information resources, absorptive capacity, and government support. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1-14.
  98. Pearce, D. W.(1983). The Dictionary of Modern Economics, the 3rd edition. Cambridge: Mcamillan Reference Books.
  99. Real, J. C., Roldan, J. L., & Leal, A.(2014). From entrepreneurial orientation and learning orientation to business performance: analysing the mediating role of organizational learning and the moderating effects of organizational size. British Journal of Management, 25(2), 186-208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00848.x
  100. Roh, Y. H.(2014). Analysis of the effectiveness of SME-supported R&D projects. Seoul: National Assembly Budget Office.
  101. Rosario, C., Varum, C., & Botelho, A.(2022). Impact of Public Support for Innovation on Company Performance: Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Sustainability, 14(8), 4731. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084731
  102. Rumelt, R. P.(1984). Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm. Competitive Strategic Management, 26(3), 556-570.
  103. Schumpeter, J.(1961). The Theory of Economic Development. Oxford University Press.
  104. Shin, G. K.(2018). SmartPLS 3.0 Structural Equation Modeling. Seoul: Chung-ram.
  105. Shin, H. W.(2010). An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Barriers and Policy Measures in Technological Innovation. JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION, 17(2), 81-107.
  106. Stevenson, H. H., Roberts, M. J., & Irving, J. I.(1994). New Business Ventures and the Entrepreneur. Illinois: Irwin.
  107. Suzanne, R., Tristram, H., & Sue, C.(2022). Approaches to quality assurance in school-based career development: policymaker perspectives from Australia. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 50(1), 110-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2021.1919860
  108. Tendur, S. T. E., Hutabarat, V. V., & Tumbelaka, S. S. X.(2021). Price perception, service quality and customer satisfaction (Empirical study on cafes at Tondano City). International Journal of Tourism & Hospitality in Asia Pacific, 4(3), 19-31.
  109. Thomas, P.(2020). Efficient Programs to Support Businesses During and After Lockdowns. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 10(1), 188-203.
  110. Tonge, J., & Moore, S. A.(2006). Importance-satisfaction analysis for marine-park hinterlands: A Western Australian case study. Tourism Management, 28(3), 768-776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.05.007
  111. Wang, C. H., Lu, I. Y., & Chen, C. B.(2008). Evaluating firm technological innovation capability under uncertainty. Technovation, 28(6), 349-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.10.007
  112. Wang, H., Liu, Y., Xiong, W., & Zhu, D.(2019). Government Support Programs and Private Investments in PPP Markets. International Public Management Journal, 22(3), 499-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1538025
  113. Wernerfelt, B.(1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic management journal. 5(2), 171-180. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
  114. Werts, C. E., Linn, R. L., & Joreskog, K. G.(1974). Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological measurement, 34(1), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447403400104
  115. Xia, H., Xiaohui, L., Tianjiao, X., & Lan, G.(2018). Home-country government support, interstate relations and the subsidiary performance of emerging market multinational enterprises. Journal of Business Research, 93, 160-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.021
  116. Yang, H. B.(2000). A study on the efficiency of start-up policy promotion. Sejong: KIET.
  117. Yang, Z.(2018). Knowledge Sharing Serves as a Mediator between Collaborative Culture and Innovation Capability. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 33, 958-969. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-10-2017-0245
  118. Yoo, H. S., Kim, Y. M., & Jeong, D. B.(2021), The impact of government support on overcoming growing pains of small and medium-sized enterprises with materials and components: Policy effectiveness analysis using PSM-DID combination model. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 24(5), 871-890. https://doi.org/10.35978/jktis.2021.10.24.5.871
  119. Yoon, D. M., Jeong, H. I., Park, G. W., Lee, S. Y., & Lee, J. K.(2020). The Effect of Government SME Support Programs (2008-2017): Focused on Consulting Support Programs. Korean Journal of Business Administration, 33(9), 1597-1623.
  120. Yoon, H. J., Hong, A. R., & Jeong, S. D.(2018). The effects of R&Ds, technology innovation capability and the innovation support system of small and medium-sized businesses on the company performance. INNOVATION STUDIES, 13(2), 209-238. https://doi.org/10.46251/INNOS.2018.05.13.2.209
  121. Yoon, S. M., Lee, Y. H., & Seo, Y. W.(2018). A Study on Innovation Activities of Firms by Government Policies and Internal Innovation Factors: A Group Analysis of Manufacturing and Service Industries. Korea coproration Management Association, 25(5), 131-157.