Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An approach to minimize reactivity penalty of Gd2O3 burnable absorber at the early stage of fuel burnup in Pressurized Water Reactor

  • Nabila, Umme Mahbuba (Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Dhaka) ;
  • Sahadath, Md. Hossain (Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Dhaka) ;
  • Hossain, Md. Towhid (Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Dhaka) ;
  • Reza, Farshid (Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of Dhaka)
  • Received : 2021.09.09
  • Accepted : 2022.04.19
  • Published : 2022.09.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The high capture cross-section (𝜎c) of Gadolinium (Gd-155 and Gd-157) causes reactivity penalty and swing at the initial stage of fuel burnup in Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR). The present study is concerned with the feasibility of the combination of mixed burnable poison with both low and high 𝜎c as an approach to minimize these effects. Two considered reference designs are fuel assemblies with 24 IBA rods of Gd2O3 and Er2O3 respectively. Models comprise nuclear fuel with a homogeneous mixture of Er2O3, AmO2, SmO2, and HfO2 with Gd2O3 as well as the coating of PaO2 and ZrB2 on the Gd2O3 pellet's outer surface. The infinite multiplication factor was determined and reactivity was calculated considering 3% neutron leakage rate. All models except Er2O3 and SmO2 showed expected results namely higher values of these parameters than the reference design of Gd2O3 at the early burnup period. The highest value was found for the model of PaO2 and Gd2O3 followed by ZrB2 and HfO2. The cycle burnup, discharge burnup, and cycle length for three batch refueling were calculated using Linear Reactivity Model (LRM). The pin power distribution, energy-dependent neutron flux and Fuel Temperature Coefficient (FTC) were also studied. An optimization of model 1 was carried out to investigate effects of different isotopic compositions of Gd2O3 and absorber coating thickness.

Keywords

References

  1. J.J. Duderstadt, L.J. Hamilton, Nuclear Reactor Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1976.
  2. H.N. Tran, V.K. Hoang, P.H. Liem, Hung T.P. Hoang, Neutronics design of VVER1000 fuel assembly with burnable poison particles, Nucl. Eng. Technol. 51 (2019) 1729-1737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.05.026
  3. Cacuci Dan Gabriel (Ed.), Handbook of Nuclear Engineering, Springer, 2010 (chapter 10).
  4. F. Khoshahval, S.S. Foroutan, A. Zolfaghari, H. Minuchehr, Evaluation of burnable absorber rods effect on neutronic performance in fuel assembly of WWER-1000 reactor, Ann. Nucl. Energy 87 (2016) 648-658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2015.10.012
  5. S.M. Reda, S.S. Mustafa, N.A. Elkhawas, Investigating the Performance and safety features of Pressurized water reactors using the burnable poisons, Ann. Nucl. Energy 141 (2020), 107354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107354
  6. A.A. Galahom, Investigation of different burnable absorbers effects on the neutronic characteristics of PWR assembly, Ann. Nucl. Energy 94 (2016) 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2016.02.025
  7. Y. Oka, H. Madarame, Nuclear Reactor Design, Springer, New York, 2013.
  8. G.L. Stefani, P.R. Rossi, J.R. Maiorino, T.A. Santos, Neutronic and thermalhydraulic calculations for the AP-1000 NPP with the MCNP6 and SERPENT codes, in: 2015 International Nuclear Atlantic Conference e INAC 2015, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 2015, pp. 4-9. October 2015.
  9. S. Chen, C. Yuan, Neutronic analysis on potential accident tolerant fuelcladding combination U3Si2-FeCrAl, Sci. Technol. Nucl. Install. 2017 (2017), 3146985, https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3146985.
  10. P. Darnowski, P. Ignaczak, P. Obrebski, M. Stepien, G. Niewinski, Simulations of the AP1000-based reactor core with SERPENT computer code, Arch. Mech. Eng., LXV (2018) 295-325, https://doi.org/10.24425/124484.
  11. F. Reza, M.H. Sahadath, Y. Akter, Modeling and neutronic analysis of pin-cell comprising nuclear fuel with different chemical composition and neutron moderator using Monte Carlo code OpenMC, Ann. Nucl. Energy 151 (2021), 107946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107946
  12. Y. Akter, M.H. Sahadath, F. Reza, Assessment of the burnup characteristics of UO2 and MOX fuel in the mixed solid and annular rod configuration, Nucl. Eng. Des. 381 (2021), 111339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2021.111339
  13. Joseph R. Burns, Richard Hernandez, Kurt A. Terrani, Andrew T. Nelson, Nicholas R. Brown, Reactor and fuel cycle performance of light water reactor fuel with 235U enrichment above 5%, Ann. Nucl. Energy 142 (2020), 107423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2020.107423