DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Quantitative microbial risk assessment indicates very low risk for Vibrio parahaemolyticus foodborne illness from Jeotgal in South Korea

  • Choi, Yukyung (Risk Analysis Research Center, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Kang, Joohyun (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Lee, Yewon (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Seo, Yeongeun (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Kim, Sejeong (Risk Analysis Research Center, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Ha, Jimyeong (Risk Analysis Research Center, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Oh, Hyemin (Risk Analysis Research Center, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Kim, Yujin (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Park, Eunyoung (Department of Food and Nutrition, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Lee, Heeyoung (Food Standard Research Center, Korea Food Research Institute) ;
  • Lee, Soomin (Risk Analysis Research Center, Sookmyung Women's University) ;
  • Rhee, Min Suk (Department of Biotechnology, College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Korea University) ;
  • Yoon, Yohan (Risk Analysis Research Center, Sookmyung Women's University)
  • 투고 : 2022.04.03
  • 심사 : 2022.08.09
  • 발행 : 2022.09.30

초록

In this study, a microbial risk assessment was performed for the bacteria Vibrio parahaemolyticus, which causes a foodborne illness following the consumption of Jeotgal, a fermented seafood in South Korea. The assessment comprised of six stages: product, market, home, consumption, dose-response, and risk. The initial contamination level (IC) was calculated based on the prevalence of V. parahaemolyticus in 90 Jeotgal samples. The kinetic behavior of V. parahaemolyticus was described using predictive models. The data on transportation conditions from manufacturer to market and home were collected through personal communication and from previous studies. Data for the Jeotgal consumption status were obtained, and an appropriate probability distribution was established. The simulation models responding to the scenario were analyzed using the @RISK program. The IC of V. parahaemolyticus was estimated using beta distribution [Beta (1, 91)]. The cell counts during transportation were estimated using Weibull and polynomial models [δ = 1 / (0.0718 - 0.0097 × T + 0.0005 × T2)], while the probability distributions for time and temperature were estimated using Pert, Weibull, Uniform, and LogLogistic distributions. Daily average consumption amounts were assessed using the Pareto distribution [0.60284,1.32,Risk Truncate(0,155)]. The results indicated that the risk of V. parahaemolyticus infection through Jeotgal consumption is low in South Korea.

키워드

과제정보

This research was supported by a grant (17162MFDS035) from Ministry of Food and Drug Safety in 2018.

참고문헌

  1. Baranyi J, Ross T, McMeekin TA, Roberts TA. Effects of parameterization on the performance of empirical models used in 'predictive microbiology'. Food Microbiol. 1996;13:83-91. https://doi.org/10.1006/fmic.1996.0011
  2. Bej AK, Patterson DP, Brasher CW, Vickery MCL, Jones DD, Kaysner CA. Detection of total and hemolysin-producing Vibrio parahaemolyticus in shellfish using multiplex PCR amplification of tl, tdh and trh. J Microbiol Methods. 1999;36:215-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7012(99)00037-8
  3. Broberg CA, Calder TJ, Orth K. Vibrio parahaemolyticus cell biology and pathogenicity determinants. Microbes Infect. 2011;13:992-1001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2011.06.013
  4. Daniels NA, MacKinnon L, Bishop R, Altekruse S, Ray B, Hammond RM, et al. Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections in the United States, 19731998. J Infect Dis. 2000;181:1661-6. https://doi.org/10.1086/315459
  5. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO], World Health Organization [WHO]. Risk assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in seafood: interpretative summary and technical report. Rome: FAO; 2011.
  6. Ha J, Lee J, Lee S, Kim S, Choi Y, Oh H, et al. Mathematical models to describe the kinetic behavior of Staphylococcus aureus in jerky. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2019;39:371-8. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e28
  7. Iwahori J, Yamamoto A, Suzuki H, Yamamoto T, Tsutsui T, Motoyama K, et al. Quantitative risk assessment of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in finfish: a model of raw horse mackerel consumption in Japan. Risk Anal. 2010;30:1817-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01444.x
  8. Jay JM, Loessner MJ, Golden DA. Foodborne gastroenteritis caused by Vibrio, Yersinia, and Campylobacter species. In: Jay JM, Loessner MJ, Golden DA, editors. Modern food microbiology. Boston, MA: Springer; 2005. p. 657-78.
  9. Jun JW, Kim JH, Choresca CH Jr, Shin SP, Han JE, Han SY, et al. Isolation, molecular characterization, and antibiotic susceptibility of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in Korean seafood. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2012;9:224-31. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2011.1018
  10. Jung SW. A foodborne outbreak of gastroenteritis caused by Vibrio parahaemolyticus associated with cross-contamination from squid in Korea. Epidemiol Health. 2018;40:e2018056. https://doi.org/10.4178/epih.e2018056
  11. Koo OK, Lee SJ, Chung KR, Jang DJ, Yang HJ, Kwon DY. Korean traditional fermented fish products: jeotgal. J Ethn Foods. 2016;3:107-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jef.2016.06.004
  12. Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [KCDC]. KNHNES (Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) [Internet]. KCDC, 2018 [cited 2019 May 12]. https://knhanes.kdca.go.kr/knhanes/sub04/sub04_04_01.do
  13. Lammerding AM. An overview of microbial food safety risk assessment. J Food Prot. 1997;60:1420-5. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-60.11.1420
  14. Lee H, Kim K, Choi KH, Yoon Y. Quantitative microbial risk assessment for Staphylococcus aureus in natural and processed cheese in Korea. J Dairy Sci. 2015;98:5931-45. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9611
  15. Lee J, Lee H, Lee S, Kim S, Ha J, Choi Y, et al. Quantitative microbial risk assessment for Campylobacter jejuni in ground meat products in Korea. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2019;39:565-75. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2019.e39
  16. Lee JK, Jung DW, Eom SY, Oh SW, Kim Y, Kwak HS, et al. Occurrence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in oysters from Korean retail outlets. Food Control. 2008;19:990-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.10.006
  17. Lee KG. Analysis and risk assessment of ethyl carbamate in various fermented foods. Eur Food Res Technol. 2013;236:891-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-013-1953-6
  18. Letchumanan V, Chan KG, Lee LH. Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a review on the pathogenesis, prevalence, and advance molecular identification techniques. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:705.
  19. Levin RE. Vibrio parahaemolyticus, a notably lethal human pathogen derived from seafood: a review of its pathogenicity, characteristics, subspecies characterization, and molecular methods of detection. Food Biotechnol. 2006;20:93-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/08905430500524275
  20. Mafart P, Couvert O, Gaillard S, Leguerinel I. On calculating sterility in thermal preservation methods: application of the Weibull frequency distribution model. Int J Food Microbiol. 2002;72:107-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(01)00624-9
  21. McCarter L. The multiple identities of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol. 1999;1:51-7.
  22. Miles DW, Ross T, Olley J, McMeekin TA. Development and evaluation of a predictive model for the effect of temperature and water activity on the growth rate of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Int J Food Microbiol. 1997;38:133-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1605(97)00100-1
  23. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety [MFDS]. Annual report of foodborne outbreaks [Internet]. MFDS. 2020 [cited 2020 Apr 14]. https://www.foodsafetykorea.go.kr/portal/healthyfoodlife/foodPoisoningStat.do?menu_no=3724&menu_ grp=MENU_NEW02
  24. Nelapati S, Nelapati K, Chinnam BK. Vibrio parahaemolyticus-an emerging foodborne pathogen-a review. Vet World. 2012;5:48-62. https://doi.org/10.5455/vetworld.2012.48-63
  25. Parveen S, DaSilva L, DePaola A, Bowers J, White C, Munasinghe KA, et al. Development and validation of a predictive model for the growth of Vibrio parahaemolyticus in post-harvest shellstock oysters. Int J Food Microbiol. 2013;161:1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2012.11.010
  26. Sanaa M, Coroller L, Cerf O. Risk assessment of listeriosis linked to the consumption of two soft cheeses made from raw milk: Camembert of Normandy and Brie of Meaux. Risk Anal. 2004;24:389-99. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00440.x
  27. Tran L, Nunan L, Redman RM, Mohney LL, Pantoja CR, Fitzsimmons K, et al. Determination of the infectious nature of the agent of acute hepatopancreatic necrosis syndrome affecting penaeid shrimp. Dis Aquat Organ. 2013;105:45-55. https://doi.org/10.3354/dao02621
  28. U.S. Department of Agriculture [USDA], Food Safety and Inspection Service [FSIS], U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA]. Microbial risk assessment guideline: pathogenic organisms with focus on food and water. Washington, DC: FSIS; 2012. Report No.: USDA/FSIS/2012-001.
  29. Vose DJ. Risk analysis in relation to the importation and exportation of animal products. Rev Sci Tech. 1997;16:17-29. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.16.1.997
  30. Wang R, Zhong Y, Gu X, Yuan J, Saeed AF, Wang S. The pathogenesis, detection, and prevention of Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:144.