Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제23권2호
  • /
  • Pages.139-150
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimized design of dual steel moment resisting system equipped with cross-anchored self-centering buckling restrained chevron brace

  • 투고 : 2021.03.10
  • 심사 : 2022.07.26
  • 발행 : 2022.08.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In most self-center braces, decreasing residual deformation is possible only by increasing pretension force, which results in lower energy dissipation capacity. On the other hand, increasing energy dissipation capacity means higher values of residual deformation. The goal of this research was to find the best design for a self-centering buckling restrained brace (SC-BRB) system by balancing self-centering capability and energy dissipation. Three, six, and nine-story structures were investigated using OpenSees software and the TCL programming language to achieve this goal. For each height, 62 different SC-BRBs were considered using different values for the pretension force of cables, the area of the buckling restrained brace (BRB) core plate, and the yield stress of the core plate. The residual deformation and dissipated energy of all the models were calculated using nonlinear analyses after cyclic loading was applied. The optimum design for each height was determined among all the models and was compared to the structure equipped with the usual BRB. The residual deformation of the framed buildings was significantly reduced, according to the findings. Also the reduction of the energy dissipation was acceptable. The optimum design of SC-BRB in 6-story building has the most reduction percent in residual deformation, it can reduce residual deformation of building 83% while causing only a 57% of reduction in dissipated energy. The greatest reduction in residual deformation versus dissipated energy reduction was for the optimum SC-BRB design of 9-story building, results indicated that it can reduce residual deformation of building 69% while causing only a 42% of reduction in dissipated energy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ahadpour Khaneghah, M.R., Mohammadi Dehcheshmeh, E. and Broujerdian, V. (2021), "Optimized design and investigation of cyclic behavior of dual intermediate steel moment resisting system equipped with self-centering buckling restrained 2-story-X-brace", Sharif J. Civil Eng., 37(2.1), https://doi.org/51-60. 10.24200/J30.2020.55635.2758.
  2. AISC360 (2016), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American National Standard; Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  3. ANSI/AISC 341-10 (2005), Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (Including Supplement No. 1), American Institute of Steel Construction; Chicago, USA.
  4. ASCE/SEI 7-10 (2016), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers; Washington, USA.
  5. Beiraghi, H. and Alinaghi, A. (2021), "Performance based assessment for tall core structures consisting of buckling restrained braced frames and RC walls", Earthq. Struct., 21(5), 515-530. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.21.5.515.
  6. Black, C.J., Makris, N. and Aiken, I.D. (2004), "Component testing, seismic evaluation and characterization of bucklingrestrained braces", J. Struct. Eng., 130(6), 880-894. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(880).
  7. Chancellor, N.B., Eatherton, M.R., Roke, D.A. and Akbas, T. (2014), "Self-centering seismic lateral force resisting systems: High performance structures for the city of tomorrow", Buildings, 4(3), 520-548. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings4030520.
  8. Chou, C.C. and Chung, P.T. (2014), "Development of crossanchored dual-core self-centering braces for seismic resistance", J. Construct. Steel Res., 101, 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.04.035
  9. Christopoulos, C., Tremblay, R., Kim, H. and Lacerte, M. (2008), "Self-centering energy dissipative bracing system for the seismic resistance of structures: Development and validation", J. Struct. Eng., 134(1), 96-107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(96).
  10. Deng, K., Pan, P., Lam, A., Pan, Z. and Ye, L. (2013), "Test and simulation of full-scale self-centering beam-to-column connection", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 12(4), 599-607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-013-0200-2.
  11. Deng, K., Pan, P., Li, W. and Xue, Y. (2015), "Development of a buckling restrained shear panel damper", J. Construct. Steel Res., 106, 311-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.01.004.
  12. Dereje, J.A., Eldin, M.N. and Kim, J. (2021), "Seismic retrofit of a soft first story structure using an optimally designed posttensioned PC frame", Earthq. Struct., 20(6), 627-637. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2021.20.6.000.
  13. Dongbin, Z., Xin, N., Peng, P., Mengzi, W., Kailai, D. and Yabin, C. (2016), "Experimental study and finite element analysis of a buckling-restrained brace consisting of three steel tubes with slotted holes in the middle tube", J. Construct. Steel Res., 124, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.05.003.
  14. Dougka, G., Dimakogianni, D. and Vayas, I. (2014), "Seismic behavior of frames with innovative energy dissipation systems (FUSEIS 1-1)", Earthq. Struct., 6(5), 561-580. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.5.561.
  15. Eatherton, M. R., Ma, X., Krawinkler, H., Mar, D., Billington, S., Hajjar, J. F. and Deierlein, G.G. (2014), "Design concepts for controlled rocking of self-centering steel-braced frames", J. Struct. Eng., 140(11), 04014082. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001047.
  16. Eatherton, M.R., Fahnestock, L.A. and Miller, D.J. (2014), "Computational study of self-centering buckling-restrained braced frame seismic performance.", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 43(13), 1897-1914. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2428.
  17. El-Sheikh, M.T., Sause, R., Pessiki, S. and Lu, L. (1999), "Seismic behavior and design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete frames", PCI J., 44(3), 54-71. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05011999.54.71
  18. Erochko, J., Christopoulos, C. and Tremblay, R. (2015), "Design, testing, and detailed component modeling of a high-capacity self-centering energy-dissipative brace", J. Struct. Eng., 141(8), 04014193. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001166.
  19. Erochko, J., Christopoulos, C., Tremblay, R. and Choi, H. (2011), "Residual drift response of SMRFS and BRB frames in steel buildings designed according to ASCE 7-05", J. Struct. Eng., 137(5), 589-599. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000296.
  20. Filippou, F.C., Popov, E.P. and Bertero, V.V. (1983), "Effects of bond deterioration on hysteretic behavior of reinforced concrete joints", UCB/EERC-83/19; University of California.
  21. Herning, G., Garlock, M.M., Ricles, J., Sause, R. and Li, J. (2009), "An overview of self-centering steel moment frames", Proceedings of the 2009 Structures Congress, Austin, Texas, United States, April. https://doi.org/10.1061/41031(341)154.
  22. Hoveidae, N. (2019), "Multi-material core as self-centering mechanism for buildings incorporating BRBs", Earthq. Struct., 16(5), 589-599. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.5.589.
  23. Izzuddin, B.A. (1991), "Nonlinear dynamic analysis of framed structures.", Ph.D. Dissertation, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London.
  24. Izzuddin, B.A., Karayannis, C.G. and Elnashai, A.S. (1994), "Advanced nonlinear formulation for reinforced concrete beamcolumns", J. Struct. Eng., 120(10), 2913-2934. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:10(2913).
  25. Kamaludin, P.N.C., Kassem, M.M., Farsangi, E.N., Nazri, F.M. and Yamaguchi, E. (2020), "Seismic resilience evaluation of RC-MRFs equipped with passive damping devices", Earthq. Struct., 18(3), 391-405. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.3.391.
  26. Karayannis, C.G., Izzuddin, B.A. and Elnashai, A.S. (1994), "Application of adaptive analysis to reinforced concrete frames.", J. Struct. Eng., 120(10), 2935-2957. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:10(2935).
  27. Khorami, M., Alvansazyazdi, M., Shariati, M., Zandi, Y., Jalali, A. and Tahir, M.M. (2017a), "Seismic performance evaluation of buckling restrained braced frames (BRBF) using incremental nonlinear dynamic analysis method (IDA)", Earthq. Struct., 13(6), 531-538. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.6.531.
  28. Kiggins, S. and Uang, C.M. (2006), "Reducing residual drift of buckling-restrained braced frames as a dual system", Eng. Struct., 28(11), 1525-1532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.10.023.
  29. Kim, J. and Choi, H. (2004), "Behavior and design of structures with buckling-restrained braces", Eng. Struct., 26(6), 693-706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.010.
  30. Kurama, Y., Pessiki, S., Sause, R. and Lu, L.W. (1999), "Seismic behavior and design of unbonded post-tensioned precast concrete walls", PCI J., 44(3), 72-89. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.05011999.72.89.
  31. Kurama, Y., Sause, R., Pessiki, S. and Lu, L.W. (1999), "Lateral Load Behavior and Seismic Design of Unbonded Post- Tensioned Precast Concrete Walls", ACI Structural J., 96(4), 622-632. https://doi.org/10.14359/700.
  32. Miller, D.J., Fahnestock, L.A. and Eatherton, M.R. (2012), "Development and experimental validation of a nickel-titanium shape memory alloy self-centering buckling-restrained brace", Eng. Struct., 40, 288-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.037.
  33. Patel, C.C., Jangid, R.S. (2011), "Dynamic response of adjacent structures connected by friction damper", Earthq. Struct., 2(2), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2011.2.2.149.
  34. Patel, C.C., Jangid, R.S. (2013), "Dynamic response of identical adjacent structures connected by viscous damper", Struct. Controland Health Monitoring, 21(2), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1002/stc.1566.
  35. Priestley, M.J.N. (1991), "Overview of PRESSS research program", PCI J., 36(4), 50-57. https://doi.org/10.15554/pcij.07011991.50.57
  36. Sabelli, R., Mahin, S. and Chang, C. (2003), "Seismic demands on steel braced frame buildings with buckling-restrained braces", Eng. Struct., 25(5), 655-666. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00175-X.
  37. Uang, C.M., Nakashima, M. and Tsai, K.C. (2004), "Research and application of buckling-restrained braced frames", Int. J. Steel Struct., 4(4), 301-313.
  38. Wang, H., Nie, X. and Pan, P. (2017), "Development of a selfcentering buckling restrained brace using cross-anchored prestressed steel strands", J. Construct. Steel Res., 138, 621-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.07.017.
  39. Xie, Q. (2005), "State of the art of buckling-restrained braces in Asia", J. Construct. Steel Res., 61(6), 727-748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2004.11.005.
  40. Zhou, Y., Shao, H., Cao, Y. and Lui, E.M. (2021), "Application of buckling-restrained braces to earthquake-resistant design of buildings: A review", Eng. Struct., 246, 112991. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112991.
  41. Zhou, Z., Xie, Q., Lei, X.C., He, X.T. and Meng, S.P. (2015), "Experimental investigation of the hysteretic performance of dual-tube self-centering buckling-restrained braces with composite tendons", J. Compos. Construct., 19(6), 04015011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000565
  42. Zhu, S. and Zhang, Y. (2008), "Seismic analysis of concentrically braced frame systems with self-centering friction damping braces", J. Struct. Eng., 134(1), 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:1(121).