Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제23권2호
  • /
  • Pages.151-168
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Mitigating the effect of urban layout on torsion of buildings caused by infill walls

  • 투고 : 2022.03.12
  • 심사 : 2022.07.26
  • 발행 : 2022.08.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Torsion is one of the most important causes of building collapse during earthquakes. Sometimes, despite the symmetric form of the building, infill walls disturb the symmetry of the lateral resisting system. The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of urban layout on developing torsion caused by infill walls. For this purpose, a typological study was conducted based on the conditions of perimeter walls on 364 buildings and then 9 cases were selected. The dimensions of the selected buildings are constant and the conditions of the perimeter walls including facades with openings and cantilevered facades are variable. The selected buildings with 60 different layouts of infill walls were analyzed and the behavior of each one was evaluated based on the torsional irregularity criteria of seismic codes. The results of the analyses showed that if the perimeter walls of a building are symmetric, asymmetric interior walls will not be important in developing torsion and effective parameters in symmetry of the perimeter infill walls are the number of walls, area of openings, aspect ratio, and construction details. Finally, architectural solutions to mitigate the torsional effects of infill walls were proposed for buildings with solid infill walls on some sides, for buildings where the perimeter walls of one side are on the cantilevered part, and for buildings where the perimeter walls of two adjacent sides are on the cantilevered part. In three-sided buildings, where two adjacent façades are cantilevered, it is often impossible to use the potential of the infill walls.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. ACI committee 318 (1999), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, American Concrete Institute; Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA.
  2. Aknouche, H., Airouche, A. and Bechtoula, H. (2019), "Effect of masonry infilled panels on the seismic performance of a R/C frames", Earthq. Struct., 16(3), 329-348. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.3.329.
  3. Al-Chaar, G. (2002), "Evaluating strength and stiffness of unreinforced masonry infill structures", No. ERDC/CERL-TR- 02-1; Engineer Research and Development Center, Champaign IL Construction Engineering Research Lab.
  4. Ambrose, J. and Vergun, D. (1998), Design for Earthquakes, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, USA.
  5. AS 1170.4-1993 (1993), Minimum Design Loads on Structures, Part 4: Earthquake Loads, Second Edition, Standards Australia; Sydney, Australia.
  6. ASCE 7-10 (2010), Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, American Society of Civil Engineers; Reston, Virginia, USA.
  7. Caruso, C., Bento, R., Marino, E.M. and Castro, J.M. (2018), "Relevance of torsional effects on the seismic assessment of an old RC frame-wall building in Lisbon", J. Building Eng., 19, 459-471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2018.05.010.
  8. Cetisli, F. (2015), "Effect of openings on infilled frame stiffness", Gradevinar, 67(08), 787-797. http://dx.doi.org/10.14256/JCE.1155.2014.
  9. Chakraborty, A., Bhattacharya, K. and Sawant, V.A. (2021), "Earthquake response of 3D asymmetric building with infill wall under soil-structure interaction", Proceedings of the Indian Geotechnical Conference 2019, 647-660, Springer, Singapore.
  10. Charleson, A. (2008), Seismic Design for Architects Outwitting the Quake, Architectural Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  11. Chaulagain, H., Rodrigues, H., Spacone, E. and Varum, H. (2016), "Seismic safety assessment of existing masonry infill structures in Nepal", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 15(2), 251-268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-016-0320-6.
  12. Demir, A. and Cengiz, M.M. (2021), "Effect of infill wall properties on seismic response of RC structures", Comput. Concrete, 27(6), 513-521. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2021.27.6.513.
  13. Dilmac, H., Ulutas, H., Tekeli, H., Demir, F. (2018). "The investigation of seismic performance of existing RC buildings with and without infill walls", Comput. Concrete, 22(5), 439-447. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2018.22.5.000.
  14. Dubey, S.K. and Sangamnerkar, P.D. (2011), "Seismic behaviour of assymetric RC buildings", IJAET, 2(4), 296-301.
  15. EN 1998-1 (2003), Eurocode8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance -Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Committee for Standardization; Brussels, Belgium.
  16. Fardis, M.N., Bousias, S.N., Franchioni, G. and Panagiotakos, T. B. (1999), "Seismic response and design of rc structures with plan-eccentric masonry infills", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dynam., 28(2), 173-191. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199902)28:2<173::AID-EQE810>3.0.CO;2-1
  17. Firdausy, A.I. (2014), "Preliminary study on seismic responses of single-story reinforced concrete frame with different arrangement of masonry infill wall", M.Sc. Dissertation, National Central University.
  18. Ghodke, R.B., Kangiri, S.D., Bande, V.N. and Dahatre, R.S. (2020), "Impact of shear wall to reduce torsional effect for unsymmetrical RC frames with and without infill walls", Res. J. Eng. Technol., 7(2), 296-299.
  19. Hareen, C.B. and Mohan, S.C. (2021), "Evaluation of seismic torsional response of ductile RC buildings with soft first story", Structures, 29, 1640-1654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.12.031.
  20. Huang, Q., Guo, Z. and Kuang, J.S. (2016), "Designing infilled reinforced concrete frames with the strong frame-weak infill principle", Eng. Struct., 123, 341-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.05.024.
  21. Iranian National Building Code (2013), Part 4, General Building Requirements, Ministry of Roads and Urban Development Islamic Republic of Iran; Tehran, Iran.
  22. Iranian National Building Code (2013), Part 6, Design Loads for Buildings, Ministry of Roads and Urban Development Islamic Republic of Iran; Tehran, Iran.
  23. IS 1893 (Indian Standard) (2002), Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures, Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings, Fifth Revision, Bureau of Indian Standard; New Delhi, India.
  24. Kakaletsis, D. and Karayannis, C. (2007), "Experimental investigation of infilled R/C frames with eccentric openings", Struct. Eng. Mech., 26(3), 231-250. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2007.26.3.231.
  25. Kaplan, O., Guney, Y., Dogangun, A. and Livaoglu, R. (2015), "Effect of infill walls and plaster for a four storey R/C building", IOMAC'15, 6th International Operational Modal Analysis Conference, Gijon, Spain, May.
  26. Karayannis, C.G. and Naoum, M.C. (2018), "Torsional behavior of multistory RC frame structures due to asymmetric seismic interaction", Eng. Struct., 163, 93-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.038.
  27. Kocak, A. (2020), "The effects of infill walls and basement shear walls on the seismic performance of existing damaged building", Eng. Failure Analysis, 118, 104797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104797.
  28. Mansouri, A., Marefat, M.S. and Khanmohammadi, M. (2014), "Experimental evaluation of seismic performance of low-shear strength masonry infills with openings in reinforced concrete frames with deficient seismic details", Struct. Design Tall Special Build., 23(15), 1190-1210. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1115.
  29. Mohammadi, M. and Nikfar, F. (2013), "Strength and stiffness of masonry-infilled frames with central openings based on experimental results", J. Struct. Eng., 139(6), 974-984. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000717.
  30. Mondal, G. and Jain, S.K. (2008), "Lateral stiffness of masonry infilled reinforced concrete (RC) frames with central opening", Earthq. Spectra, 24(3), 701-723. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2942376.
  31. Mostafaei, H. and Kabeyasawa, T. (2004), "Effect of infill masonry walls on the seismic response of reinforced concrete buildings subjected to the 2003 bam earthquake strong motion: A case study of bam telephone center", Bull. Earthq. Res. Institute, The University of Tokyo, 79, 133-156.
  32. Motwani, P. and Santhi, A.S. (2015), "Simulation of brick infill and effect of openings on RC frames using ANSYS", Jndian J. Sci. Technol., 8(S2), 29-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8iS2/57798.
  33. NBC 201 (1994), Mandatory Rules of Thumb Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Masonry Infill, Ministry of Physical Planning and Works; Babar Mahal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  34. Noorifard, A. (2017), "A model for determining the arrangement and geometrical specifications of non-structural walls in the final stages of basic architectural design to improve the seismic behavior of buildings; common mid-rise residential buildings in Tehran", Ph.D. Dissertation, Iran University of Science and Technology. (In Persian).
  35. Noorifard, A., Mehdizadeh Saradj, F. and Tabeshpour, M.R. (2022), "A model for determining the arrangement and geometric specifications of infill walls in the architectural design to improve the seismic behavior of buildings", Arch. Eng. Design Management, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2022.2082360.
  36. Noorifard, A., Saradj, F.M. and Tabeshpour, M.R. (2017), "Preventing undesirable seismic behaviour of infill walls in design process", Urbanism Arch. Construct., 8(1), 1-24.
  37. Noorifard, A., Tabeshpour, M.R. and Saradj, F.M. (2016), "Preventing irregularity effects of infills through modifying architectural drawings", Arch. Civil Eng. Environ., 9(2), 77-92. https://doi.org/10.21307/acee-2016-024.
  38. Noorifard, A., Tabeshpour, M.R. and Saradj, F.M. (2020), "An approximate method to identify torsion caused by infill walls through geometric specifications of architectural plans", J. Build. Eng., 32, 101799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101799.
  39. Ozmen, C. and unay, A.I. (2007), "Commonly encountered seismic design faults due to the architectural design of residential buildings in Turkey", Build. Environ., 42(3), 1406-1416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.09.029.
  40. Sezen, H., Whittaker, A.S., Elwood, K.J. and Mosalam, K.M. (2003), "Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, turkey earthquake, and seismic design and construction practise in Turkey", Eng. Struct., 25(1), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00121-9.
  41. Sigmund, V. and Penava, D. (2012), "Experimental study of masonry infilled R/C frames with opening", 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, September.
  42. Turkish Earthquake Code 2007 (2007), Specification for structures to be built in earthquake areas, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Government of the Republic of Turkey; Turkey.
  43. Standard No. 2800 (2015), Iranian Code of Practice for Seismic Resistant Design of Buildings, 4th Edition, Building and Housing Research Center; Tehran, Iran.
  44. Tabeshpour, M.R., Azad, A. and Golafshani, A.A. (2012), "Seismic behavior and retrofit of infilled frames", Earthquake- Resistant Structures - Design, Assessment and Rehabilitation, Intech, London, United Kingdom.
  45. Tabeshpour, M.R. and Noorifard, A. (2020), "A new procedure to determine equivalent strut of infill walls with openings for engineering applications", Proc. Institution Civil Engineers Struct. Buildings, 173(8), 585-601. https://doi.org/10.1680/jstbu.18.00113.
  46. Tanganelli, M., Viti, S., De Stefano, M. and Reinhorn, A.M. (2013), "Influence of infill panels on the seismic response of existing rc buildings: A case study", Seismic Behaviour and Design of Irregular and Complex Civil Structures, 119-133. Springer, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  47. Tsai, M.H. and Huang, T.C. (2009), "Effect of interior brick-infill partitions on the progressive collapse potential of a RC building: Linear static analysis results", Eng. Technol., 50, 883-889. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1082681.
  48. Ucar, T. (2020), "Influence of infill walls on modal expansion of distribution of effective earthquake forces in RC frame structures", Earthq. Struct., 18(4), 437-449. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2020.18.4.437
  49. Varadharajan, S., Sehgal, V.K. and Saini, B. (2012), "Review of different structural irregularities in buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 39(5), 393-418.
  50. Vicente, R.S., Rodrigues, H., Varum, H., Costa, A. and da Silva, J. (2012), "Performance of masonry enclosure walls: lessons learned from recent earthquakes", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 11(1), 23-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-012-0095-3.