한국수학교육학회지시리즈D:수학교육연구 (Research in Mathematical Education)

  • 제25권3호
  • /
  • Pages.175-188
  • /
  • 2022
  • /
  • 1226-6191(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-9943(eISSN)
한국수학교육학회 (Korean Society of Mathematical Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A First Grade Teacher's Challenge in Promoting Students' Understanding of Unit Iteration

  • 투고 : 2022.02.02
  • 심사 : 2022.07.20
  • 발행 : 2022.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Measurement has been an important part of mathematics content students must learn through their schooling. Many studies suggest students' weak measurement learning, particularly related to length measurement, on the part of lower grade students. This difficulty has been attributed to mathematics curriculum as well as instruction. Building on a view of teaching as an interactive activity, this paper explores how a first grade teacher interacted with her students in small groups in a length measurement lesson to promote conceptual understanding as well as procedural fluency. I found that even though the teacher supported students to explain and justify what they understood, the ways the teacher interacted with students were not effective to promote students' understanding. Even though this finding is based on an analysis of a single mathematics lesson, it provides an example of challenges in promoting students' understanding through interaction with students in the context of teaching length measurement.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Buys, K., & De Moor, E. (2008). Domain description measurement. In M. van den HeuvelPanhuizen & K. Buys (Eds.), Young children learn measurement and geometry (pp.15-36). Sense Publishers.
  2. Castle, K., & Needham, J. (2007). First graders' understanding of measurement. Early Childhood Education Journal, 35(3), 215-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-007-0210-7
  3. Chapin, S. H., O'Connor, M. C., & Anderson, N. C. (2009). Classroom discussions: Using math talk to help students learn, Grades K-6. Math Solutions.
  4. Chiu, M. M. (2004). Adapting teacher interventions to student needs during cooperative learning: How to improve student problem solving and time on-task. American Educational Research Journal, 41(2), 365-399. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312041002365
  5. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning trajectories approach. Routledge.
  6. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards.pdf
  7. Cooke, B. D., & Buchholz, D. (2005). Mathematical communication in the classroom: A teacher makes a difference. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(6), 365-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-005-0007-5
  8. Dekker, R., & Elshout-Mohr, M. (2004). Teacher interventions aimed at mathematical level raising during collaborative learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 56(1), 39-65. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDUC.0000028402.10122.ff
  9. Dempsey, N. P. (2010). Stimulated recall interviews in ethnography. Qualitative Sociology, 33(3), 349-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-010-9157-x
  10. Dietiker, L. C., Gonulates, F., & Smith III, J. P. (2011). Understanding linear measure. Teaching Children Mathematics, 18(4), 252-259. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.18.4.0252
  11. Edith, H. H. M. (2015). Elementary school teachers' instruction in measurement: Cases of classroom teaching of spatial measurement in Taiwan. In Lianghue, F., Ngai-Ying, W., Jinfa, C., & Shiqi, L., (Eds.), How chinese teach mathematics: Perspectives from insiders, (pp. 149-184). World Scitific Press.
  12. Erbilgin, E. (2015). Scaffolding conceptual understanding for linear measurement. Teaching Children Mathematics, 22(5), 300-309. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.22.5.0300
  13. Featherstone, H., Crespo, S., Jilk, L., Oslund, J., Parks, A., & Wood, M. (2011). Smarter together! Collaboration and equity in the elementary math classroom. NCTM.
  14. Fuson, K., Kalchman, M., & Bransford, J. D. (2005). Mathematical understanding: An introduction. In M. S. Donovan & J. D. Bransford (Eds.), How students learn: History, mathematics, and science in the classroom (pp. 217-256). The National Academies Press.
  15. Gillies, R. M., & Boyle, M. (2006). Ten Australian elementary teachers' discourse and reported pedagogical practices during cooperative learning. Elementary School Journal, 106(5), 429-452. https://doi.org/10.1086/505439
  16. Kamii, C., & Clark, F. B. (1997). Measurement of length: The need for a better approach to teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 97(3), 116-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.1997.tb17354.x
  17. Kazemi, E., & Hintz, A. (2014). Intentional talk: How to structure and lead productive mathematical discussions. Stenhouse Publishers.
  18. Kloosterman, P., Rutledge, Z., & Kenney, P. A. (2009). Exploring results of the NAEP: 1980s to the present. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(6), 357-365. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.14.6.0357
  19. Kouba, V. L., Brown, C. A., Carpenter, T. P., Lindquist, M. M., Silver, E. A., & Swafford, J. O. (1988). Results of the fourth NAEP assessment of mathematics: Measurement, geometry, data interpretation, attitudes, and other topics. The Arithmetic Teacher, 35(9), 10-16.
  20. Lee, M. Y., & Francis, D. C. (2016). 5 ways to improve children's understanding of length measurement. Teaching Children Mathematics, 23(4), 218-224. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.23.4.0218
  21. McDonough, A., & Sullivan, P. (2011). Learning to measure length in the first three years of school. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(3), 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911103600305
  22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Author.
  23. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author.
  24. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2014). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. Author.
  25. Nguyen, N. T., McFadden, A., Tangen, D., & Beutel, D. (2013). Video-stimulated recall interviews in qualitative research. Australian Association for Research in Education Annual Conference, Adelaide, Australia.
  26. Pak, B. (2020). Understanding prospective teachers' verbal intervention through teachers' group work monitoring routines. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series D: Research in Mathematical Education, 23(4), 219-234.
  27. Pak, B. (2021) Exploring teachers' interactions with small groups that engage students in epistemic practices. Journal of the Korean Society of Mathematical Education Series D: Research in Mathematical Education, 24(3), 229-254.
  28. Smith III, J. P., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Teppo, A. R. (2011). Learning, teaching, and using measurement: introduction to the issue. ZDM, 43(5), 617. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0369-7
  29. Solomon, T. L., Vasilyeva, M., Huttenlocher, J., & Levine, S. C. (2015). Minding the gap: Children's difficulty conceptualizing spatial intervals as linear measurement units. Developmental Psychology, 51(11), 1564-1573. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039707
  30. Stephan, M., & Clements, D. H. (2003). Linear and area measurement in prekindergarten to grade 2. Learning and Teaching Measurement, 5(1), 3-16.
  31. Thompson, T. D., & Preston, R. V. (2004). Measurement in the middle grades: Insights from NAEP and TIMSS. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 9(9), 514-519. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.9.9.0514
  32. Stough, L.M. (2001, April). Using stimulated recall in classroom observation and professional development. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
  33. Wood, T. & Turner-Vorbeck, T. (2001). Extending the conception of mathematics teaching. In T. Wood (Ed.), Beyond classical pedagogy teaching elementary school mathematics (pp. 185-208). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  34. Wood, T., Williams, G., & McNeal, B. (2006). Children's mathematical thinking in different classroom cultures. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 37(3), 222-255.