DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

비전공자를 위한 파이썬 기초 프로그래밍 커리큘럼과 평가문제 개발분석

Python Basic Programming Curriculum for Non-majors and Development Analysis of Evaluation Problems

  • 허경 (경인교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Hur, Kyeong (Department of Computer Education, Gyeong-In National University of Education)
  • 투고 : 2022.03.31
  • 심사 : 2022.04.18
  • 발행 : 2022.04.30

초록

파이썬 프로그래밍 언어를 강의하는 과목은, 일반 대학에서 모든 재학생이 필수로 이수하는 교양 과목으로 대부분 운영되고 있다. 이를 통해, 컴퓨팅 사고에 의한 기초 프로그래밍 과정을 학습한 비전공자 학생들이 다양한 전공 분야에서 SW를 적용할 수 있는 융합 역량을 강화하고 있다. 기존 연구결과에서는 컴퓨팅 사고 개념 이해와 코드 작성 역량에 대한 다양한 평가 방법들이 제시되었다. 그러나, 평가 문제 사례는 제시되지 않아, 실제 과목 운영 시 적용하는 데 어려움이 있다. 이에 본 논문에서는 비전공자들을 위한 교양과목으로 적용할 수 있는 파이썬 기초 프로그래밍 커리큘럼을 ADDIE 모형에 따라 제안하였다. 그리고 제안된 상세 커리큘럼에 따른 파이썬 요소별 평가 문제 사례를 1차와 2차로 나누어 제안하였다. 마지막으로 본 평가 문제 사례를 적용한 강좌에서 산출된 비전공자 학생들의 평가 점수 결과를 바탕으로 제안한 평가 문제의 유효성을 분석하였다. 제안된 평가 문제 사례는 실시간 온라인 비대면 평가 방식으로 적용하여, 효과적으로 비전공자 학생들의 프로그래밍 역량을 평가할 수 있음을 확인하였다.

Most of the courses that teach the Python programming language are liberal arts courses that all students in general universities must complete. Through this, non-major students who have learned the basic programming process based on computational thinking are strengthening their convergence capabilities to apply SW in various major fields. In the previous research results, various evaluation methods for understanding the concept of computational thinking and writing code were suggested. However, there are no examples of evaluation problems, so it is difficult to apply them in actual course operation. Accordingly, in this paper, a Python basic programming curriculum that can be applied as a liberal arts subject for non-majors is proposed according to the ADDIE model. In addition, the case of evaluation problems for each Python element according to the proposed detailed curriculum was divided into 1st and 2nd phases and suggested. Finally, the validity of the proposed evaluation problem was analyzed based on the evaluation scores of non-major students calculated in the course to which this evaluation problem case was applied. It was confirmed that the proposed evaluation problem case was applied as a real-time online non-face-to-face evaluation method to effectively evaluate the programming competency of non-major students.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. S. O. Yang, "Necessity of computational thinking," Korea Information Processing Society Review, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 4-12, March 2017.
  2. J. M. Wing, "Computational thinking," Communications of the ACM, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 33-35, March 2006. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
  3. J. M. Wing, "Computational thinking and thinking about computing," Philosophical Transactions of the Royal So Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 366, no. 1881, pp. 3717-3725, October 2008.
  4. W. S. Sohn, "A method for measuring and evaluating for block-based programming code," Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 293-302, June 2016. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.20.3.293
  5. J. K. Kim, "Development of rubric for assessing computational thinking concepts and programming ability," Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 27-36, November 2017. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2017.20.6.003
  6. K. Hur, "A study on quantization of a code evaluation method through visualization of computational thinking," Journal of Practical Engineering Education, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 199-206, April 2021. https://doi.org/10.14702/JPEE.2021.199
  7. ADDIE Model, Wikipedia, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/ADDIE_%EB%AA%A8%ED%98%95.
  8. K. H. Lee, "Coding Enhancement Python," Seoul : Jpub, 2020.